以資料包絡分析法考量生態效益之供應商選擇

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：31

、訪客IP：18.188.29.49

姓名

林書瑋(Shu-Wei Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

以資料包絡分析法考量生態效益之供應商選擇
(Consider Eco-efficiency for Supplier Selection Using Data Envelopment Analysis)

相關論文

★ 半導體化學材料銷售策略分析-以跨國B化工公司為例	★ TFT-LCD CELL製程P檢點燈不良解析流程改善之關聯法則應用
★ 金融風暴時期因應長鞭效應的策略 –以X公司為例	★ 勞動生產力目標訂定之研究-DEA 資料包絡法應用
★ 應用田口方法導入低溫超薄ITO透明導電膜於電容式觸控面板之研究	★ 多階不等效平行機台排程與訂單決策
★ 多準則決策之應用-以雷射半導體產業為例	★ 專案管理模式進行品管圈活動-以半導體機台保養測機流程改善為例
★ 應用e8D降低不合格品之效益分析-以快速消費品製造為例	★ 供應商評選模式之建構-以塑膠射出成型機製造為例
★ 應用協同規劃預測補貨於伺服器備品存貨改善之研究－以Q代工公司為例	★ 船用五金拋光作業之生產規劃
★ 以SCOR模型探討汽車安全輔助系統供應鏈-以A公司採購作業改善為例	★ 研發補助計畫執行成效評估之研究以「工業基礎技術專案計畫」為例
★ 運用生態效益發展永續之耳機產業	★ 失效模式設計審查(DRBFM)之應用-以筆記型電腦為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，隨著全球人口不斷攀升，工業化產業不斷增加，全球暖化及大自然環境日復一日地遭受破壞，世界各地天災數量在這世紀已增加近兩倍，近年來世界各國因極端氣候的影響蒙受重大的損失，根據聯合國開發計畫組織統計，全球天然災害損失於1960年代每年約755億美元，至2015年代已逼近每年損失2650億美元，50年來損失增加至3倍，且趨勢不斷增加。各國政府為了保護我們所生存的地球，紛紛開始提倡永續發展的理念。企業組織也由於政府政策的宣導與媒體的傳播，將永續理念導入企業經營中。永續供應鏈管理在近幾年來被許多學者進行研究的探討，而綠色供應商選擇和評估一直以來都是對於永續供應鏈管理來說為一個重大的挑戰。
本研究以三種效率指標，生產效益、環境效益和生態效益來做為綠色供應商選擇的一個決策訂定單位及評估指標。並將投入和產出等因素歸入產品生產，然而產品產出分為兩種不同產出，一種為良好產出；一種為不良產出，將兩者分別納入不同效益之考量，同時利用資料包絡分析法分別以三種不同的目標線性規劃模型來分析生產、環境和生態之效益權重，並將供應商輪流做為主角進行自我效益評估，以跟其他供應商進行比較。但是由於生態效益會因為較小之生產或環境效益影響，而忽略投入項和不良產出項之權重，使得生態效益值受到影響，會使值近似生產或環境其中之一值。為了避免此問題發生，並利用混合式效益模型合併三種效益之模型，以一個模型運算來求得各權重，同時消除會因為其中一種效益的權重大小而影響生態效益的因素，同時也能減少多個模型運算次數，藉此減少運算時間及資源，以資料包絡分析法的同時，也以交叉分析法找出最適之供應商來來進行排名遴選，以此達到整體供應鏈最大效益，以及經濟與環境兩者之間的平衡，進而達到永續發展。

摘要(英)

In recent years, as the global population continues to rise and industrialization industry in-creasing. Global warming and the natural environment is destructive day by day. The number of natural disasters around the world has increased nearly twice in this century. The world due to the impact of extreme weather has suffered heavy losses in recent years. According to the United Nations development program organization statistics, global natural disaster losses nearly $ 75.5 billion in 1960, and to 2015′s approaching loss of $ 265 billion per year, for 50 years the loss increases to 3 times. Governments in order to protect the Earth we live, have started to promote the concept of sustainable development. Because of media dissemination and advocacy of government policy, business organizations import the concept of sustainable development to the company. Sustainable supply chain management has been studied by many scholars to explore, and the green supplier selection and assessment is a major challenge for sustainable supply chain management.
In this study use three efficiency indicators, production efficiency, environmental effi-ciency and eco- efficiency for decision of green supplier selection and evaluation units set targets. And consider the inputs, outputs and other factors into production. However, the output is divided into two different outputs, one for good output as desirable output; one for the bad output as undesirable output that included in the effectiveness of different considera-tions. In the mean time, use data envelopment analysis for three different linear programming model to analysis the weight of production, environment and eco-efficiency, and a supplier as DMU to self- efficiency assessment and compare with other suppliers. However, the eco-efficiency values will affected by the smaller production or the environmental efficiency, it will ignore the weight of the input and undesirable output, and the eco-efficiency will make an approximate value of production or environment. To avoid this problem, using mix effi-ciency model to combine three different model, to find the weight by using only one model. It will not only eliminate the deviations of production and environment efficiency model, but also decrease the calculation of three models. In the same time, use cross analysis to select the best supplier to achieve the maximum efficiency of the whole supply chain and balance be-tween the economy and the environment, in order to achieve the sustainable development.

關鍵字(中)

★ 永續發展
★ 綠色供應鏈管理
★ 生態效益
★ 綠色供應商選擇
★ 資料包絡分析法

關鍵字(英)

★ Sustainable development
★ Green supplier chain management
★ Eco-efficiency
★ Green supplier selection
★ Data envelopment analysis

論文目次

中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
一、緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的 2
1-3研究架構與流程 2
二、文獻回顧 5
2-1永續發展 5
2-1-1永續發展之定義 5
2-1-2永續發展之內涵與架構 8
2-1-3 永續發展與社會責任之衡量指標 10
2-2綠足跡 14
2-2-1碳足跡 14
2-2-2水足跡 15
2-2-3生態足跡 17
2-3永續供應鏈管理 19
2-3-1永續供應鏈管理定義 20
2-3-2永續供應鏈管理概念 22
2-4供應商選擇 23
2-4-1傳統供應商選擇 23
2-4-2生態效益之範疇 26
2-4-3綠色供應商選擇 27
三、問題描述 30
3-1研究問題探討 30
3-2研究方法 30
3-2-1資料包絡分析法 31
3-2-2衡量效益指標 34
四、參數定義與模型建立 36
4-1 基本假設 36
4-2 研究模型 36
4-3 DEA模型 37
4-4 DEA混合式模型 41
4-5 交叉分析模型 43
五、情境設計與結果分析 46
5-1 筆電產業 46
5-1-1產業發展 47
5-1-2產品介紹與產業供應鏈 50
5-2 DEA基礎生產效益模型驗證 52
5-3情境一 DEA環境效益模型與生態效益模型 54
5-4情境二 DEA混合式生態效益模型 57
5-5情境三 DEA交叉分析 61
六、結論與建議 64
參考文獻 66
英文文獻 66
中文文獻 72
附錄一參數數據 73

參考文獻

英文文獻
Adam S. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. First pub-lished in 1776 by W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London.
Advance IT & Security, https://www.pinterest.com/pcpartsetc/know-your-laptop-parts/ (ac-cessed: 03.20.16)
Amit K., Vipul J., Sameer K. (2014). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Journal of Omega, 42, p.109-123.
Anastasia N. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development and Environmental Ethics. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, p.1077-1082.
Andrew C. T., Joseph S. (2014). Identifying robust portfolios of suppliers: a sustainability se-lection and development perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, p.2088-2100.
Arjen Y. H., Ashok K. C., Maite M. A., Mesfin M. M. (2011). The Water Footprint Assessment Manual. First published in 2011 by Earthscan.
Banerjee S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24, p.143-180.
Bansal P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable devel-opment. Journal of Strategic Management, 26, p.197-218.
Carter, R. C., Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain manage-ment: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38 (5), p.360-387.
Charnes A., Cooper W. W. (1962).Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Re-search Logistics Quarterly, 9, p.181–185.
Chenxing W., Lihua W., Xinlei L., Chong D., Ding D., Jia J., Yan Y., Gang W. (2015). Carbon footprint of textile throughout its life cycle: a case study of Chinese cotton shirts. Jour-nal of Cleaner Production, 108, p.464-475.
Craig R., Carter P., Liane E. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and fu-ture directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, p.46-62.
Donella M., Jorgen R., Dennis M. (1972). The Limits to Growth. Universe Books Publishers, New York.
Dyckhoff, H., Allen, K. (2001). Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment anal-ysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research, 132, p.312–325.
Edgar G. H., Glen P. P. (2009). Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analy-sis. Journal of Environment Science Technology, 43, p.6414-6420.
Figueiredo J. L. (2016). Electrochemical storage mechanisms in non-stoichiometric cerium ox-ide/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. Electrochimica Acta, 209, p.25-35.
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Im-plications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, Jour-nal of Cleaner Production, 20(4), p.874-907.
Global carbon atlas (2016). http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/?q=en/emissions, (accessed: 12.17.16.).
Guangyao D., Yong M., Xia L. (2015). Regional water footprint evaluation and trend analysis of China-based on interregional input-output model. Journal of Cleaner Production, p.1-9.
Hart & Farrell (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures Organization & Environment, 21, (3), p.245-269
Hoekstra A.Y. (2011). The Water Footprint of Modern Consumer Society. Routledge, London, UK.
Hoekstra A.Y., Mekonnen M.M. (2003). The water footprint of humanity. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA.
Igarashi, M., de Boer, L., Fet, A.M. (2013). What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal Purchase Supply Manage-ment, 19 (4), p.247–263.
IPCC (2013): Climate Change (2013): The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley(eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
IPCC. (2013): Climate Change (2013): The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley(eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535.
Jingzheng R., Alessandro M., Sara T., Antonio S., Shiyu T., Lichun D., Suzhao G. (2013). De-sign and modeling of sustainable bioethanol supply chain by minimizing the total ecolog-ical footprint in life cycle perspective. Journal of Bio-resource Technology, 146, p.771-774.
Jixi G., Meirong T. (2015). Analysis of over-consumption of natural resources and the ecolog-ical trade deficit in China based on ecological footprints. Journal of Ecological Indica-tors, 61, P.899-904.
Joana M. C. M., Jean-Sébastien T., Ralf W. S. (2015). Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design. Journal of Production Economics, 166, p.129-142.
Joseph S., Dileep G. D. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A tri-ple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. Journal of Production Economics, 166, p.177-191.
Kannan G., Sivakumar R., Joseph S., Murugesan P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making ap-proaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, p.66-83.
Korhonen P. J., Luptacik M. (2004). Eco-efﬁciency analysis of power plants: anextension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154 (2), p.437–446.
Koskela, M., Vehmas, J. (2012). Defining eco‐efficiency: A case study on the Finnish forest industry. Business Strategy Environment, 21 (8), p.546-566.
Kumar, A., Jain, V., Kumar, S. (2014). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Journal of Omega, 42 (1), p.109-123.
Larisa I., Marian M., Anca D., Attila T., Simona R. (2015). Modeling the green supply chain in the context of sustainable development. Journal of Economics and Finance, 26, p.702-708.
Lee K-H., Farzipoor S. R. (2012). Measuring corporate sustainability management: a data en-velopment analysis approach. Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), p.219-226.
Mahdi M., Reza F. S., Ki-Hoon L. (2015). Technical, environmental and eco-efﬁciency meas-urement for supplier selection: An extension and application of data envelopment analy-sis. Journal of Production Economics, 168, p.279-289.
Marco F., Paolo T. (2015). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, p.1-14.
Maria S. M., Alessandro G., Valentina N., David L., Simone B., Mathis W., Nadia M. (2015). Ecological Footprint: Refining the carbon Footprint calculation. Journal of Ecological In-dicators, 61, p.390-403.
María T. G., Blanca M., Isabel S. (2015). Analyzing the sustainable energy development in the EU-15 by an aggregated synthetic index. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 52, p.996-1007.
Montiel, (2008)"Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts," Common Futures Organization & Environment, 21, (3), pp.245-269
Morera S., Ll. Corominas, M. Poch, M. M. Aldaya, J. Comas (2015). Water footprint assess-ment in wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, p.1-8.
Murat O., Yunus E. Y. (2015). Energy structure of Turkey for sustainable development. Jour-nal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, p.1259-1272.
NASA Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. (2015). Global Temperature, Sea Level, Land Ice. From http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/land-ice/ (accessed: 12.06.15)
Noor A. R., Susila M. (2015). Eco-efficiency in greenhouse emissions among manufacturing industries: A range adjusted measure. Journal of Economic Modelling, 47, p.219-227.
Okadera T., Watanabe M., Xu K. Q. (2006). Analysis of water demand and water pollutant discharge using a regional input – output table: an application to the city of Chongqing, upstream of the Three Gorges Damin China. Journal of Ecological Economic, 58, p.221-237.
Payman A., Cory S. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sus-tainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, p.329-341.
Pedro J. M., José M. (2014). Lean Management, Supply Chain Management and Sustainabil-ity: A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, p.134-150.
Pekka J. K., Mikulas L. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, p.437-446.
Rachel Carson (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Publishers. U.S
Rainer L., Ronny R. (2015). Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review. Journal of European Management Journal, p.1-14.
Ramli N., Munisamy S., Arabi B. (2013). Scale directional distance function and its applica-tion to the measurement of eco-efficiency in the manufacturing sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 211 (1), p.381-398.
Sarkis J., Meade L. M., Presley A. R. (2012). Incorporating sustainability into contractor eval-uation and team formation in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 40-53.
Schaltegger S., Sturm A. (1990). Öologische Rationalität(German/in English: Environmental rationality). European Journal Die Unternehmung 4, p.117-131.
Seiford L. M., Zhu J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efﬁciency evaluation. European Journal Operator, 142 (1), p.16-20.
Seyed H. H., Amir K., Madjid T. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. Journal of Production Economics, 159, p.178-191.
Sharma S., Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the devel-opment of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Journal of Strategic Man-agement, 19, p.729-753.
Shrivastava P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Journal of Strategic Management, 16, p.183-200.
Sproedt A., Plehn J., Schönsleben P., Herrmann C. (2015). A simulation-based decision sup-port for eco-efficiency improvements in production systems. Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion, 105, p.389-405.
Starik, M., Rands G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem per-spectives of eco-logically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, p.908-935.
Talluri S., Narasimhan R. (2004). A methodology for strategic sourcing. European Journal. Operator, 154(1), p.236–250.
Tobias B. T., Ruisheng N., Zhiquan Y., Bin S. (2015). Framework and methods to quantify carbon footprint based on an office environment in Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Pro-duction, 112, p.4183-4195.
Tomáš H., Svatava J., Bedřich M. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 60, p.565-573.
Tomohiro O. Yong G., Tsuyoshi F., Huijuan D., Zhu L., Noboru Y., Takaaki K. (2015). Evalu-ating the water footprint of the energy supply of Liaoning Province, China: A regional input–output analysis approach. Journal of Energy Policy, 78, p.148-175.
UN Climate Change Conference. (2009). Copenhagen Accord.
United Nations. (1972). Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Envi-ronment.
United Nations. (1992). AGENDA 21.
United Nations. (2012). Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Develop-ment.
WCED. (1987). Our Common Future - The World Commission on Environment and Devel-opment. Oxford University Press.
Wiedmann T., Minx J. (2008). A definition of carbon footprint. In: Pertsova, C.C. (Ed.), Eco-logical Economics Research Trends. Chapter 1. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York, pp. 1-11.
Yong G., Liming Z., Xudong C., Bing X., Tsuyoshi F., Huijuan D. (2014). Urban ecological footprint analysis: a comparative study between Shenyang in China and Kawasaki in Ja-pan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75, p.130-142.
Yung-Jaan L. (2015). Land, carbon and water footprints in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 54, p.1-8

中文文獻
施余貞，(2011)。探討永續發展與財務績效之關聯性-以Global企業永續排名為例。銘傳大學國際企業所。
TED-Ed：非懂不可水資源。取自 http://tedxtaipei.com/articles/ted-ed-water (12.21.2013)

指導教授

王啟泰(Chi-Tai Wang)

審核日期

2016-7-21

推文