以安全為核心的醫療產品生命週期管理 -以電動輪椅為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：18.218.147.56

姓名

方德恩(Te-En Fang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

以安全為核心的醫療產品生命週期管理 -以電動輪椅為例
(Safety-based Product Lifecycle Management of Medical Devices – Electric Wheelchair as an example)

相關論文

★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程	★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例	★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法	★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例	★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例	★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選	★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例	★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析	★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

醫療器材產業的範疇十分廣泛，而各國對於產業發展的方向也不盡相同。由於已開發國家邁向高齡化以及對於提升醫療照護品質的訴求，醫療器材產業快速成長。一般而言，歐美醫材產業多以醫院用品為主，台灣則是以消費型醫療產品為主，例如：電動代步車與電動輪椅，而成為全球主要的供應國。
醫療儀器的安全度直接影響病人安全，因此各國政府極為重視醫療器材與產品的控管與審核。對於台灣電動代步車的廠商，如何確保產品在整個生命週期中的安全性，成為極重要的課題。產品生命週期管理的概念在於利用資訊系統以管理與整合與產品相關的各種活動，包括研發、製造、行銷、客服、財會等，而所有活動皆以提升品質與確保安全為核心目標。
本研究將以產品生命週期管理為範疇，電動代步車為例，建構一產品生命週期管理系統。除了界定產品生命週期中各階段的重點活動，並且針對產品的關鍵特性，建議應用失效模式及效應分析(FMEA)以及糾正預防措施（CAPA）等方法，以強化醫療器材的品質與安全。

摘要(英)

The scope and the development directions of medical devices industry are varied among the countries. Owing to the ageing society and the high-quality healthcare requirements, rapid medical devices industry growth is occurring. The medical devices industry is mostly of hospital consumer products in Western countries. Comparing to Western, the main market in Taiwan is medical consumer products, like Electric Handicapped Scooter (EHS), and electric wheelchair, etc. It can be expected, Taiwan becomes the main supplier in the world.
Safety of medical devices directly impacts on the patients. Therefore, the government attaches importance among the medical devices, products control, and verification. For the electric handicapped scooter suppliers in Taiwan, how to ensure the safety during the entire product life cycle becomes a major issue. We describe an information system to support the Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) concept holds the product details of supervising, integrating, and the omnigenous processing. Including research, manufacturing, marketing, customer service, financial, etc. Every step aims to enhance quality and safety assurance.
This research illustrates three circumstances. First, we focus electric vehicle wheelchair industry on constructing the PLM system. Furthermore, applying Corrective Action and Preventive Action (CAPA) to inspect the manufacturing procedures. Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) to find out the potential failure modes and calculate Risk Priority Number (RPN). Using before and after RPN number to know the improving approaches are worth. Finally, strengthen the approaches in CAPA to intensify both the quality and safety of medical devices. It can be applied to any sector, but special attention must be given to each industry particularities in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 醫療器材
★ 生命週期管理
★ 失效模式及效應分析
★ 糾正預防措施

關鍵字(英)

★ Medical devices Industry
★ Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
★ Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
★ Corrective Action and Preventive Action (CAPA)

論文目次

Table of Contents
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
Acknowledgements iv
Table of Contents v
List of Figures viii
List of Tables ix
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 The Status of Medical Safety Assessment 1
1.2 The Medical Devices Industry (MDI) in Taiwan 2
1.3 Research Objectives 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 Medical Device Industry in the World 4
2.2 Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) In Industry 7
2.2.1 The PLM Concept 7
2.2.2 The Current Status of PLM 8
2.2.3 PLM in Industry 8
2.2.4 PLM in Medical Device Industry 9
2.3 CAPA in Industry 13
2.3.1 CAPA Background 13
2.3.2 The Concept and Definition of CAPA 14
2.3.3 CAPA in Industry 14
2.4 Failure Modes and Effect Analysis in Industry 15
2.4.1 Origin and Development of FMEA: 15
2.4.2 The Concept of FMEA 16
2.4.3 FMEA in Industry 16
2.5 Concluding Remark 20
Chapter 3 Topic Propose and Methodologies 21
3.1 Research Framework 21
3.1.1 Research Objective 21
3.1.2 Methodology Framework 22
3.1.3 Research Steps Flow 24
3.2 Corrective Action and Preventive Action (CAPA) 25
3.2.1 The structure of Corrective Action and Preventive Action (CAPA) 25
3.2.2 Corrective Action (CA) 26
3.2.3 Preventive Action (PA) 27
3.3 Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) 28
3.3.1 The Structure of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) 28
3.3.2 The Flow of FMEA 30
3.3.3 Risk Priority Number (RPN) 32
Chapter 4 Simulated Example 35
4.1 Electric Vehicle Wheelchairs Industry 35
4.2 Apply the framework in the Simulated Example 38
4.2.1 Applying the framework 41
4.2.2 Simulated Example Results 44
Chapter 5 Research Conclusions and Future Research 50
5.1 Research Conclusions 50
5.2 Review of Research Findings 50
5.3 Limitations of the Research 51
5.4 Recommendations for Future Research 51
References 53
Chinese References 55
Website 55

List of Figures
Figure 2: Market Forecast of Global Medical Equipment Industry Analysis Pie Chart (2012) 5
Figure 3: Market Forecast of Global Medical Equipment Industry Analysis Pie Chart (2016) 6
Figure 5: The product lifecycle of medical devices with framework idea 22
Figure 6: Research Framework 23
Figure 7: Research Steps Flow 24
Figure 8: CAPA-CA part in research framework 26
Figure 9: CAPA-PA part in research framework 27
Figure 10: Three categories of FMEA 29
Figure 11: FMEA Flow 31
Figure 12: Five categories of Medical devices in Taiwan 35
Figure 13: Auxiliary devices and remedy devices 36
Figure 14: Electric wheelchair procedure 39
Figure 15: Electric wheelchair procedure-wheelchair part 40
Figure 16: Electric wheelchair procedure with failure modes 42
Figure 17: Electric wheelchair procedure- wheelchair part with failure modes 43

List of Tables

Table 1: The Six Target Subsystems 11
Table 2: Different FMEA cases’ target audiences and purposes 18
Table 3: Tools and strategies investigated 19
Table 4: FMEA Table 28
Table 5: FMEA Severity category 32
Table 6: FMEA Occurrence category 33
Table 7: FMEA Detection category 33
Table 8: The results of Case study 44

參考文獻

References
[1] Ahire, C. P., & Relkar, A. S., "Correlating failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) & overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)." Procedia Engineering 38, pp. 3482-3486, 2012.
[2] Amann, K., "Product lifecycle management: empowering the future of business.", CIMdata, Inc, 2002.
[3] Brown, A., Dixon, D., Eatock, J., Meenan, B. J., & Young, T., “A survey of success factors in new product development in the medical devices industry”, In Engineering Management Conference, 2008, IEMC Europe 2008, IEEE International (pp. 1-5),IEEE, 2008, June.
[4] Bramstedt, K. A., "Failure mode and effects analysis as an informed consent tool for investigational cardiothoracic devices." ASAIO journal 48.3, pp. 293-295, June 2002.
[5] Paradies, M., "Why People Don′t Develop Effective Corrective Actions", IEEE 7th Human Factors Meeting, September 2002.
[6] Paradies, M., "Improving an Existing Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action Program", 8th IEEE HFPPI13th HPRCT, August 2007.
[7] Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., “Engineering design: a systematic approach.” vol. 34. London: Springer-verlag, doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2, March 2007.
[8] Kang, J., Sun, L., Sun, H., & Wu, C., “Risk assessment of floating offshore wind turbine based on correlation- FMEA ”, Ocean Engineering, 129, 382-388, January 2017.
[9] Onofrio, R., Piccaglib, F., and Segato, F., “Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) for Medical Devices: Does Standardization Foster Improvements in the Practice?”, Procedia Manufacturing, 3, pp.43-50, December 2015.
[10] Saaksvuori, A., and Immonen, A., “Product lifecycle management.” Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
[11] Schuh, G., Rozenfeld, H., Assmus, D., & Zancul, E., "Process oriented framework to support PLM implementation." Computers in industry 59.2 : 210-218, 2008.
[12] Stamatis, D.H. “Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution.”, Asq Press, 2003.
[13] Sofronia, R. E., Knott, T., Davidescu, A., Savii, G. G., Kuhlen, T., & Gerressen, M., "Failure mode and effects analysis in designing a virtual reality‐based training simulator for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy." The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 9.1: e1-e9, January 2013.
[14] Sudarsan, R., Fenves, S. J., Sriram, R. D., & Wang, F., "A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management." Computer-aided design, 37,13, pp.1399-1411, February 2005.
[15] Wongmongkolrit, S., "Work force scheduling for mixture policy of preventive and corrective maintenance", Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management IEEM, December 2008.
[16] Zhao, X., & Bai, X., " The Application of FMEA method in the Risk Management of Medical Device during the Lifecycle", In e-Business and Information System Security (EBISS), 2010 2nd International Conference on IEEE, pp. 1-4, May 2010.
Chinese References
[1] 張慈應等編著，2013醫療器材產業年鑑，財團法人工業技術研究院產業經
濟與趨勢研究中心，台北市，中華民國102年5月。
Website
[1] International Organization for Standardization (ISO), EN ISO(1994). "8402 Quality management and quality assurance–Vocabulary: ISO 802: 1994”/ EN ISO 8402.
(https://www.iso.org/standard/20115.html, accessed Feb 28, 2017)
[2] Oracle (2008), “Product Lifecycle Management in the Medical Device Industry”.
(http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/agile/lifecycle-mgmt-medical-device-bwp-070013.pdf, accessed Oct 11, 2016)
[3] US Food and Drug Administration (2016), “FDA′s Quality System Regulation CFR 820.”
(https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=820, accessed Feb 22, 2017)
[4] Youtube，製造科技小型摩托車製造流程，2014年11月。
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MDi3qYda-w&t=184s, accessed April 14, 2017)
[5] Youtube，製造科技輪椅製造流程，2014年11月。
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFOvDM_6Sps&t=616s, accessed Jan 22, 2017)
[6] 張慈應，生技醫療器材產業趨勢與商機，工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研
究中心，中華民國102年。
(http://www.instrument.org.tw/archive/101082401.pdf, accessed June 4 2017)
[7] 張慈應，生技醫療器材產業趨勢與商機，工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研
究中心，中華民國105年。
(http://www.instrument.org.tw/archive/101082401.pdf, accessed June 4 2017)
[8]台灣就業通，全球醫療器材產業發展現況與趨勢，勞動部勞動力發展署，中華民國105年1月。(https://www.taiwanjobs.gov.tw/internet/index/docDetail_frame.aspx?uid=1590&pid=230&docid=30327&nohotkey=Y, accessed June 4 2017)

指導教授

高信培、高信培(Hsing-Pei Kao Hsing-Pei Kao,)

審核日期

2017-6-28

推文