使用空間模型方法進行再製造的訂價策略

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：16

、訪客IP：52.15.210.12

姓名

阮美心(NGUYEN THI MY HANH) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

使用空間模型方法進行再製造的訂價策略
(Pricing strategy in remanufacturing using a spatial model approach)

相關論文

★ 應用灰色理論於有機農產品之經營管理— 需求預測及關鍵成功因素探討	★ NAND型Flash價格與交運量預測在風險分析下之決策模式
★ 工業電腦用無鉛晶片組最適存貨政策之研究-以A公司為例	★ 砷化鎵代工廠磊晶之最適存貨管理-以W公司為例
★ 資訊分享&決策制定下產銷協同關係之研究 -以IC設計業為例	★ 應用分析層級法於電子化學品業委外供應商評選準則之研究
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車售服零件庫存滯銷因素分析-以C公司為例	★ 多目標規劃最佳六標準差水準: 以薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器C公司製造流程為例
★ 以資料探勘技術進行消費者返廠定期保養之實證研究	★ 以價值鏈觀點探討品牌公司關鍵組織流程之取決-以S公司為例
★ 應用產銷協同規劃之流程改善於化纖產業-現況改善與效益分析	★ 權力模式與合作關係對於報價策略之影響研究—以半導體產業A公司為例
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車製造業之庫存原因分析	★ 以類神經網路預測代工費報價---以中小面板產業C公司為例
★ 電路板產業存貨改善研究-以N公司為例	★ 運用六標準差改善機台備用零件(Spare parts)存貨管理

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2030-12-30以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究利用Salop 空間模型分析OEM廠商(原始設備製造商)及IR廠商(獨立
再製造商)的利潤,並協助OEM廠商決定是否應該生產再製造產品,亦或者不與IR廠
商競爭僅生產全新產品。
此外,無論OEM廠商是否參與再製造市場,OEM廠商都應該決定全新產品重複利
用的水平,因為水平越高可以吸引更多顧客並使自身利潤最大化。再者,本研究提出
OEM廠商全新產品、OEM廠商再製造產品以及IR廠商再製造產品的價格策略。該研究
還提出了戰略決策,如果OEM應該將類似產品再製造為IR製造的再製造產品。
本研究結果顯示:
(i)是否參與再製造市場主要取決於再製造的成本及製造全新產品的成本。
(ii)當OEM不提供再製造產品時,新產品的最優價格總是低於OEM提供新產品和
再製造產品時的最佳新產品價格。當OEM參與再製造市場時,OEM提供與IR相似的再
製造產品時,可以以更高的價格銷售新的和再製造的產品,而不是從IR的再製造產品
提供不同的再製造產品。
(iii)價格策略及最佳客製化水平取決於可重複利用率。

摘要(英)

This study uses the Salop spatial model to analyze the profit of OEM (Original Equipment
Manufacturer) and IR (Independent Remanufacturer) and helps OEM decide if they should
produce remanufactured products or leave the remanufacturing market for IR and only produce
new products.
Moreover, either OEM participates in remanufacturing market or not, OEM should decide
at which level of reusability of new products, they could attract more customers as well as
maximize their own profit. In addition, the study proposes strategic prices for OEM-new
products, OEM-remanufactured products, and IR-remanufactured products. The research also
suggests strategic decisions whether or not the OEM should remanufacture similar products to
remanufactured products made by IR.
Our research findings include: (i) Offering remanufactured products may not always
improve OEM’s profit, the decision of participating in the remanufacturing market depends
critically on the costs of remanufacturing and costs of manufacturing new products. (ii) The
optimal price of new products when OEM does not offer remanufactured products is always
lower than the optimal price of new products when OEM offers both new and remanufactured
products. When OEM participates in remanufacturing market, OEM can sell new and
remanufactured products at higher prices when it offers similar remanufactured products as IR
than when it provides different remanufactured goods from IR’s remanufactured goods. (iii)
The price strategies and optimal level of customization depend on the reusable rate.

關鍵字(中)

★ 再製造
★ 客製化
★ 重複利用
★ Salop 空間模型
★ 閉鎖式供應鏈

關鍵字(英)

★ Remanufacturing
★ customization
★ similarity
★ reusability
★ Salop spatial model,
★ closed-loop supply chain

論文目次

摘要 ........................................................................................................................................i
Abstract..................................................................................................................................ii
Acknowledgements...............................................................................................................iii
Table of Contents..................................................................................................................iv
List of Figures.......................................................................................................................vi
List of Tables.......................................................................................................................viii
Chapter 1: Introduction..........................................................................................................1
1-1 Research background ............................................................................................1
1-2 Research motivation..............................................................................................1
1-3 Research objectives...............................................................................................2
1-4 Research framework..............................................................................................3
Chapter 2: Review of related literature and studies...............................................................4
2-1 Closed-loop supply chains with remanufacturing.................................................4
2-2 Salop’s circle model & similarity..........................................................................6
2-3 Reusability...........................................................................................................10
Chapter 3: Model ................................................................................................................. 11
3-1 The problem overview ........................................................................................ 11
3-2 The model overview............................................................................................14
3-2-1 Scenario 1: OEM only produces new products...................................................14
3-2-2 Scenario 2: OEM with same remanufactured products as IR’s ..........................20
3-2-3 Scenario 3: OEM with different remanufactured products from IR’s.................24
Chapter 4: Numerical study .................................................................................................29
4-1 The base case.......................................................................................................29
4-2 The factorial design.............................................................................................32
4-3 Extension with product customization ................................................................38
Chapter 5: Conclusion and future gap .................................................................................45
References............................................................................................................................47

參考文獻

1. Agrawal, V. V., Atasu, A., & Van Ittersum, K. (2015). Remanufacturing, third-party
competition, and consumers′ perceived value of new products. Management Science,
61(1), 60-72.
2. Alderighi, M., & Piga, C. A. (2008). The circular city with heterogeneous firms.
3. Ayres, R., Ferrer, G., & Van Leynseele, T. (1997). Eco-efficiency, asset recovery and
remanufacturing. European Management Journal, 15(5), 557-574.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00035-2
4. Balasubramanian, S. (1998). Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition
between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Science, 17(3), 181-195.
5. Chen, J.-M., & Chang, C.-I. (2013). Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured
products in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics,
146(1), 153-160.

6. Chen, J.-M., & Chang, C.-I. (2016). Pricing and collection effort decisions in a closed-
loop supply chain. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(8), 568-578.

7. Chen, J.-M., & Hsu, Y.-T. (2017). Competitive pricing and reusability choice for
remanufacturable products. Aktual′ni Problemy Ekonomiky= Actual Problems in
Economics(193), 169.
8. Directive, E. C. (2012). Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment, WEEE. Official
Journal of the European Union L, 197, 38-71.
9. Ferguson, M., Guide Jr, V. D., Koca, E., & Souza, G. C. (2009). The value of quality
grading in remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 18(3), 300-314.
10. Ferguson, M. E., & Toktay, L. B. (2006). The effect of competition on recovery
strategies. Production and operations management, 15(3), 351-368.
11. Ferrer, G. (1997a). The economics of PC remanufacturing: INSEAD.
12. Ferrer, G. (1997b). The economics of tire remanufacturing. Resources, Conservation
and Recycling, 19(4), 221-255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(96)01181-0
13. Ferrer, G., & Ayres, R. U. (2000). The impact of remanufacturing in the economy.
Ecological Economics, 32(3), 413-429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-
8009(99)00110-X
14. Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2006). Managing new and remanufactured products.
Management science, 52(1), 15-26.

48

15. Geyer, R., Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Atasu, A. (2007). The economics of
remanufacturing under limited component durability and finite product life cycles.
Management science, 53(1), 88-100.
16. Guide, J., V. Daniel R., & Li, J. (2010). The Potential for Cannibalization of New
Products Sales by Remanufactured Products*. Decision Sciences, 41(3), 547-572.
doi:doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00280.x
17. Guide Jr, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2001). Managing product returns for
remanufacturing. Production and operations management, 10(2), 142-155.
18. Guide, V. D. R. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry
practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467-483.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00034-6
19. Hauser, W. M., & Lund, R. T. (2008). Remanufacturing: operating practices and
strategies: perspectives on the management of remanufacturing businesses in the United
States: Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Boston University.
20. Ijomah, W. L., McMahon, C. A., Hammond, G. P., & Newman, S. T. (2007).
Development of robust design-for-remanufacturing guidelines to further the aims of
sustainable development. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19),
4513-4536. doi:10.1080/00207540701450138
21. Kamigaki, K., Matsumoto, M., & Fatimah, Y. A. (2017). Remanufacturing and
Refurbishing in Developed and Developing Countries in Asia – A Case Study in
Photocopiers. Procedia CIRP, 61, 645-650.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.223
22. Krueger, C. W. (1992). Software reuse. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 24(2), 131-
183.
23. Lin, M., & Wu, R. (2015). Production cost heterogeneity in the circular city model.
Operations research letters, 43(4), 401-404.
24. Lund, R. T. (1996). The remanufacturing industry: hidden giant: Boston University.
25. Majumder, P., & Groenevelt, H. (2001). Competition in remanufacturing. Production
and operations management, 10(2), 125-141.
26. McCaskey, D. (1994). Anatomy of adaptable manufacturing in the remanufacturing
environment. Paper presented at the APICS remanufacturing seminar proceedings, USA.
27. Mitra, S., & Webster, S. (2008). Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of
government subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 287-298.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.042

49

28. Nazmi, M. A. S. M., Wahab, D. A., Abdullah, S., & Tihth, R. M. (2011). Development
of artificial neural network for optimisation of reusability in automotive components.
Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(6), 996-1003.
29. Neto, J. Q. F., Bloemhof, J., & Corbett, C. (2016). Market prices of remanufactured,
used and new items: Evidence from eBay. International Journal of Production
Economics, 171, 371-380.
30. Örsdemir, A., Kemahlıoğlu‐Ziya, E., & Parlaktürk, A. K. (2014). Competitive quality
choice and remanufacturing. Production and operations management, 23(1), 48-64.
31. Ovchinnikov, A. (2011). Revenue and cost management for remanufactured products.
Production and operations management, 20(6), 824-840.
32. Robotis, A., Boyaci, T., & Verter, V. (2012). Investing in reusability of products of
uncertain remanufacturing cost: the role of inspection capabilities. International Journal
of Production Economics, 140(1), 385-395.
33. Salop, S. C. (1979). Monopolistic competition with outside goods. The Bell Journal of
Economics, 141-156.
34. Singh, S., Singh, S., & Singh, G. (2010). Reusability of the Software. International
Journal of Computer Applications, 7(14), 38-41.
35. Subramanian, R., & Subramanyam, R. (2012). Key Factors in the Market for
Remanufactured Products. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14(2),
315-326. doi:10.1287/msom.1110.0368
36. Tereyağoğlu, N. (2016). Market Behavior Towards Remanufactured Products
Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (pp. 19-28): Springer.
37. Thakral, S., & Sagar, S. (2014). Vinay. Reusability in Component Based Software
Development-A Review. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(12), 2068-2072.
38. Wall Street Journal, 2009. Cisco ignores sizable market for used networking gear. URL
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090804-715395.html
39. Webster, S., & Mitra, S. (2007). Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact
of take-back laws. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1123-1140.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.014
40. Wu, C.-H. (2013). OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured
product. Omega, 41(2), 287-298.
41. Wu, C.-H., & Chang, Y.-L. (2013). Price competition with OEM-remanufactured
products. National Science Council, Taiwan.
http://gebrc.nccu.edu.tw/proceedings/APDSI/2013/proc/P130115002.pdf

指導教授

陳振明(Jen-Ming Chen)

審核日期

2019-1-8

推文