修讀跨領域學程對薪資之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：19

、訪客IP：18.222.121.156

姓名

徐昌祺(Chang-Chi Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

修讀跨領域學程對薪資之影響
(The Wage Effect of Interdisciplinary Learning)

相關論文

★ 國際貿易對勞動需求彈性之影響分析－以臺灣上市櫃製造業公司為例	★ 組織變革與技術別薪資差異之關係：以臺灣製造業為例
★ 心理資本、薪資水準與工作努力程度關係之研究：以某跨國企業為例	★ 人口政策與生男偏好之城鄉分析
★ 臺灣本籍與外籍配偶生育差異之分析	★ 全民健保與少子高學歷對台灣老人居住安排之影響分析
★ 會計師執照價值及其薪資不均之研究	★ 效率工資理論測試--離職率模型台灣之實証研究
★ 台灣學用配合度與經濟成長關係之研究	★ 工作風險對世代間行業選擇之影響－以製造業為例
★ 長期照護機構之勞動要素需求探討	★ The Impact of Unemployment on Crime in Europe
★ 中國大陸薪資不均、教育溢酬與貿易開放關係之研究	★ 三角貿易、利潤分享與薪資成長:以台灣製造業為例
★ 職業區隔程度對男女薪資差異之影響分析	★ Phillips Curve from Psychological Perspectives

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來跨領域(Interdisciplinary)的風潮興起，各大專院校為因應未來的就業需求，積極推出各式學程供學生修讀，相關人才的培育也成為我國高等教育推行的要點。由於修讀跨領域學程所帶來的薪資報酬，是學生選擇學程時的重要考量之外，有鑑於我國跨領域學程的豐富性，相關議題更是值得探究。本文利用「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查：教育與勞力市場的連結」（Taiwan Education Panel Survey and Beyond，簡稱TEPS-B）所提供的追蹤資料，主要的研究目的在於探討修讀跨領域學程對薪資之影響。同時，也額外分析學程對非薪資報酬層面的影響。本研究首先以最小平方法衡量修畢跨領域學程對大學畢業生畢業後各年薪資收入及第一份全職工作薪資的影響；再以panel迴歸觀察樣本在不同時間點下的薪資變化。另外，以probit model衡量跨領域學程是否有助於提升擔任管理職及進入高薪職業的機率；最後，則利用ordered probit model探討跨領域學程對工作滿意度之影響。
　　實證結果發現，修讀跨領域學程可在勞動市場中獲取較高的薪資水準，且學程難易度愈高，愈有助於提升薪資。以第一份全職工作為例，不分種類跨領域學程的修讀平均有3.8%之薪資報酬率、修讀雙主修則約為4.9%、師培更是高達15.5%。但是，但此報酬隨著進入勞動市場的時間增加而逐漸消逝。其原因可能是進入職場多年後，薪資的決定因素可能與個人的工作經歷與能力更有關係。此外，修讀學分學程之非薪資報酬實證結果發現，其有助於提升擔任管理職之機率；修讀師培學程則是對於進入高薪職業及工作滿意度皆有正向益助。上述實證結果顯示，修讀跨領域學程對薪資及職涯發展皆有正向幫助。其背後的原因可能是修讀跨領域學程可培養多項專業能力，提升人力資本與勞動生產力；也可能是跨領域學程使其在就業市場上具較佳的鑑別度。不論如何，整體來看，難度較高或較全面性的學程似乎對於薪資與職涯發展有較明顯的正向影響。因此，本研究建議在跨領域課程制度的設計上，應確保學程的質量能使學生完善的學習各種專業技能，才能培育出符合企業所需的「跨領域人才」。

摘要(英)

In recent years, the trend of interdisciplinary learning has arisen. Many colleges have offered various interdisciplinary programs for students in response to future employment needs. Cultivating cross-disciplinary talents has also become the main point of higher education. However, the wage effect of interdisciplinary programs is an important consideration for students when choosing such a program. Furthermore, given the richness of interdisciplinary programs in Taiwan, rewards related issues are worth exploring. This article uses the data from Taiwan Education Panel Survey and Beyond (TEPS-B) to mainly explore the impact of interdisciplinary programs on wage and use a few chapters to explore non-wage outcomes. First, we use Ordinary Least Squares to estimate the impact of interdisciplinary programs on monthly wage and the first full-time job wage. Then we use the panel regression to analyze the changes in wages over time. In addition, we investgate whether interdisciplinary programs can improve the probability of taking up a management position and entering high-paying occupations by the probit model, and how the programs affect people’s level of job satisfaction by the ordered-probit model.
The empirical results show that studying interdisciplinary programs can have higher wages in the labor market. And we find that the more difficult interdisciplinary programs will have better wage rewards. Take the first-full time job as an example. On average, there is a 3.8% wage premium for any interdisciplinary program of study, 4.9% for double majors, and 15.5% for teacher education program. But this premium gradually disappears as the time to enter the labor market increases. The reason for this may be that after entering the job market for many years, the determinants of wages may be rather related to personal work experience and work ability. Regarding non-wage rewards, taking credits program does help increasing the chances of taking up management positions and teacher education program is positively related to high-paying occupations and job satisfaction. According to the results, learning multi-skills by studying interdisciplinary program can either improve people’s human capital stock and hence their labor productivity or be a good signal in job market. We thus conclude that studying interdisciplinary program is helpful for both wages and career development. The more comprehensive the interdisciplinary programs, the higher the positive impact on wage and career development. As a result, it is recommended that the quality of the interdisciplinary program ought to be emphasized as designing the program, aiming to improve students’ professional skills and cultivate their "cross-disciplinary talents" that meet the needs of job market.

關鍵字(中)

★ 跨領域學程
★ 薪資

關鍵字(英)

★ Interdisciplinary Programs
★ Wages

論文目次

目錄
第一章、研究動機與目的……………………………………………………………1
第二章、文獻探討……………………………………………………………………7
第三章、我國跨領域學制之說明……………………………………………………9
3.1　我國跨領域學程之概要 9
3.1.1 雙主修學程 10
3.1.2　輔系學程 10
3.1.3　學分學程和第二專長 11
3.1.4　師資培育學程 12
3.2 各跨領域學程學分比較 13
第四章、資料來源及模型設定………………………………………………………16
4.1　資料來源 16
4.2　實證策略說明 18
4.3　薪資模型之設定 20
4.3.1　各年度之薪資方程式模型 20
4.3.2　第一份全職工作的薪資方程式 22
4.3.3　Panel data薪資方程式 22
4.4　修讀跨領域其他影響效果之模型設定 25
4.5　變數的基本統計量 28
第五章、證實結果分析………………………………………………………………32
5.1　跨領域學程對薪資之影響 32
5.1.1　各年度薪資方程式迴歸結果 32
5.1.2 對職涯薪資之影響 38
5.1.3　對第一份工作薪資之影響 41
5.1.4　薪資議題之小結與討論 43
5.2　跨領域學程對其他面向的影響 44
5.2.1　對擔任管理職之影響 44
5.2.2　對進入高薪職業之影響 45
5.2.3　對工作滿意度之影響 46
5.3　穩健測試 47
第六章、結論…………………………………………………………………………50
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………………53
附錄一　………………………………………………………………..……………55
附錄二　……………………………………………………………………………..57
附錄三　……………………………………………………………………………..59
附錄四　……………………………………………………………………………..62

參考文獻

英文
Bibb, R., & Form, W. (1977). “The Effects of Industrial, Occupational, and Sex
Stratification on Wages in Blue-Collar Markets” Social Forces, 55(4), 974-996.
Del Rossi, A. F., & Hersch, J. (2008). “Double Your Major, Double Your Return?”
Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 375-86.
Hemelt, S. W. (2010). “The College Double Major and Subsequent Earnings.”
Education Economics, 18(2), 167-189.
Ivanitskaya, L., & Clark, D., & Montgomery, G., & Primeau, R. (2002).
“Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes.” Innovative Higher Education,
27(2), 95-111.
Liu, J. L., & Huang, C. H., & Yang, C. H. (2013). “Technological Change, Job Risk,
and Wage Premium: Evidence From Taiwan.” The Developing Economies, 51(2),
186-202.
Levine, P. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (1995). “The Benefit of Additional High School
　Math and Science Classes for Young Men and Women.” Journal of Business &
　Economic Statistics, 13(2), 137-149.
Paulsen, R.(2018). “Race, Ethnicity, and the College Double Major” SSRN Electronic
　Journal.
Russell, A. W., & Dolnicar, S., & Ayoub, M. (2008). “Double Degrees: Double the
Trouble or Twice the Return?” High Education, 55(5), 575-591.
Spelt, E. J. H., & Biemans, H. J. A., & Tobi, H., & Luning, P. A., & Mulder, M.
(2009). “Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A
Systematic Review.” Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 365-378.
Zafar, B. (2011). “Double Majors: One for Me, One for The Parents?” Economic
Inquiry, 50(2), 287-308.

中文
秦夢群、莊清寶(2010)。〈大專生求學經歷與就業力關係〉。教育資料與研究雙月
　　刊，94，85-112。
許書銘(2005)。〈學校教育對商學院學生職場表現之研究〉，國立台灣大學農業經
　　濟學研究所碩士論文。
賴靜瑩(2012)。〈科技校院畢業生初入職場就業表現之相關因素探討〉，國立雲林
　　科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。

指導教授

黃麗璇(Li-Hsuan Huang)

審核日期

2019-7-5

推文