探討港口數位化架構之設置-以印度尼西亞之海運“海洋高速公路” “Sea Toll”為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：52.15.210.12

姓名

庫斯馬(KUSUMA) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

探討港口數位化架構之設置-以印度尼西亞之海運“海洋高速公路” “Sea Toll”為例
(Developing a Framework for the Digitalization of Seaports: A Case Study of “Sea-Toll” Project in Indonesia.)

相關論文

★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例	★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究	★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業	★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標	★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理	★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究	★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率－以Ａ公司塗料充填流程改善為例	★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例	★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

海洋運輸是個重要的全球活動之一，對多島國家印尼而言尤為重要。海港相關利益者之間的存在相互依存關係，凸顯於海港中貨櫃船運輸重要性，因此海港中的調度彈性與競爭力之影響為“sea toll”研究計劃中主要的調查因子之一。自從 “sea toll” 一個概念該是由美國政府於2011年發起的，在群島國家中, 有意很少研究或明確的標準與 “sea toll” 系統的發展有關。研究過程中基於對港口主要利益相關者的線調查，包括船運公司，港口當局，商品公司和印尼政府。我們的研究分為三個階段。首先，我們通過使用層次分析法和質量功能部署方法來總體分析海港物流系統的應變能力。結果顯示改善港口績效標準並支持物流系統和措施復原力相關的是先進信息技術系統的增強。

第二階段，重點放在層次分析法“sea toll”計劃問題上，同時從和措施復原力和企業競爭力方面分析“sea toll”計劃實施的影響措施復原力對於印尼群島的海港。“sea toll” 的分析結果對於計劃的抵禦力和競爭力的作用的分析結果表明，提高抵禦力主要是基於與夥伴或利益相關者建立協作計劃的有效策略。在研究的最後階段，通過設計集成的IoT框架，通過移動應用程序同步所有區域中每個港口利益相關方的整個管理流程，從而提供了創新的解決方案。通過每個港口利益相關者的所有管理流程集成到在線系統，特別是在時間和成本方面，港口系統服務性能將更加有效。

摘要(英)

Maritime transportation has been one of the most important global activities, especially for archipelago countries such as Indonesia. The interdependence between stakeholder of seaports especially in container seaports led us to investigate the impact of the “sea toll” program on the seaport’s resilience and competitiveness. Since the concept of a “sea toll” was initiated by the US government in 2011, there are only a few, studies or clear standards related to the development of “sea toll” systems in archipelago countries. The research process is based on an online survey of key stakeholders of seaports including shipping companies, seaport authorities, commodity companies, and the Indonesian government. Our study divided into three stages. First, we analyze the resilience measurement of the seaport logistics system in general by using the analytical hierarchy process and quality function deployment approaches. The result shows that improving port performance standards and support the logistics system has highly associated with resilience measures is an enhancement of the advanced information technology system.
While in the second stage, we focus on the issue of the “sea toll” program based on the analytical hierarchy process approach, we analyze the impact of the implementation of the “sea toll” program in terms of the resilience measures and competitiveness of the seaports in the Indonesian archipelago. The results of the analysis on the "sea toll" program regarding the role of resilience and competitiveness indicate that increasing resilience is based primarily on effective strategies in building collaborative programs with partners or stakeholders involved. And on the last phase of the study provides an innovative solution by designing an integrated IoT framework to synchronize the entire administrative process of each port stakeholder in all regions through a mobile application. Through integrating all administrative processes of each port stakeholder to online system, the port system service performance will be more effective and efficient especially in terms of time and cost.

關鍵字(中)

★ Sea-Toll計劃
★ 復原力
★ 競爭力
★ AHP
★ QFD
★ IOT

關鍵字(英)

★ Sea Toll Program
★ Resilience
★ Competitiveness
★ AHP
★ QFD
★ IOT

論文目次

Contents

摘要 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………i
Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………………….....ii
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………………v
List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………...…..vi
Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….…..1
1.1 Review to the Maritime Sector in Indonesia ..…………………………………………….1
1.2 Related Literature on the Maritime Sector……….………………..………………………..3
Chapter 2 Analysis of Seaport Logistics Resilience System………………….……………………….…..8
2.1 The Seaports System……...…………………………………………………………….....11
2.2 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)……………………………………………….............13
2.3 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)……………………………………………...…….15
2.4 The Integrated AHP-QFD Model ………………………………………………………..17
2.5 Result and Discussion …………………………………………………………………...21
2.5.1 AHP Model of Seaport System …………………….......……………………22
2.5.2 First HOQ Linking AHP Output and Performance Standard of Port Operation……………………………………………………………………..27
2.5.3 Second HOQ Linking First HOQ output and Resilience Measures …………31
2.5.4 Resilience Measures …………………………………………………………32
Chapter 3 Analysis the Impact of the “Sea Toll” Program for Seaports ……………………….……35
3.1 The Indonesia “Sea Toll” Program ……………………………………………………...36
3.1.1 Sea Toll System for Container Services ……………………………………….38
3.1.2 Sea Toll System for Passenger & Cruises Services …………………………...40
3.2 Development of the Seaport System from a Theoretical Aspect ………………………..42
3.3 The Impact of the “Sea Toll” Program on Seaport Resilience and Competitiveness……44
3.4 Research Methodology ………………………………………………………………….49
3.5 Data Analysis and Discussion …………………………………………………………..53
3.5.1 The Impact of “Sea Toll” on Seaport Resilience ……………………………...53
3.5.2 The Impact of “Sea Toll” on Seaport Competitiveness ……………………….56
3.6 Implication and Conclusion ……………………………………………………………..58
Chapter 4 IOT Framework to Support “Sea Toll” Program………………………………………....60
4.1 Internet of Things on Seaport System …………………………………………………...63
4.2 Research Process ………………………………………………………………………...65
4.3 The Objective and Main Function of Design in IOT Maritime Transportation System…69
4.3.1 Design of Port Service User …………………………………………………...71
4.3.2 Design of Shipping Company Service System ………………………………..72
4.3.3 Design of Port Authority System ……………………………………………...73
4.3.4 Design of Government System ………………………………………………..73
4.4 Implication and Recommendation ………………………………………………………74
4.4.1 Implication for Practice ………………………………………………………..75
4.4.2 Implication for Theoretical …………………………………………………….76
Chapter 5 Summary…………………………………………………………………………….…….78
References……………………………………………………………………………………………83

List of Figure

Figure 1 Framework of Research Analysis………………………………………………………….18
Figure 2 Framework of QFD………………………………..………………………………………19
Figure 3 Flowchart of The First HOQ…………………………………………….………………...20
Figure 4 Flowchart of The Second HOQ…………………………………….………………….…..21
Figure 5 Indonesian Main Sea-Corridor…………………………………………………………….37
Figure 6 Chart of Sea Toll Elements for Container Services….........................................................39
Figure 7 Shipping Industry Supporting……..……………………………………………….……...40
Figure 8 Chart of Sea Toll Elements for Passenger Services & Cruise…………………………….. 41
Figure 9 An Example of Filling in the AHP Score Column ………………………………………...52
Figure 10 Strategic Alliance Framework ……………………………………………………………56
Figure 11 Seaport Performance Framework ………………………………………………………...58
Figure 12 Research Process ………………………………………………………………………….67
Figure 13 The Technical Architecture of Digitalizing Seaport System………….....………………..68
Figure 14 The Architecture of Existing Information System………………………………………..70
Figure 15 The Architecture of IOT Technology Platform…………………………………………...72
Figure 16 Application Marine Highway Tech on Play Store………………………………………...75
Figure 17 New Pattern of Development of Seaport Logistics Systems……………………………...77

List of Tables

Table 1 Critical problem and supporting variables for customer requirements data.……………..…14
Table 2 Respondent data for questionnaire distribution AHP-QFD.……….………………….…….15
Table 3 Output accumulated score on the first variable of logistics costs………………………...…22
Table 4 Output normalize test on the first variable of logistics cost.…………………………...……23
Table 5 Output consistency test on the first variable of logistics costs………………………………23
Table 6 Output accumulated score on the first variable of Dwelling time…………………………...23
Table 7 Output normalize test on the first variable of Dwelling time ……………………………….24
Table 8 Output consistency test on the first variable of Dwelling time……………………………...24
Table 9 Output accumulated score on the first variable of Distribution Channels…….......………...24
Table 10 Output normalize test on the first variable of Distribution Channels ……………………..25
Table 11 Output consistency test on the first variable of Distribution Channels ……………………25
Table 12 Output accumulated score on the first variable of Operational costs of Port ……………...26
Table 13 Output normalize test on the first variable of Operational costs of Port …………………..26
Table 14 Output consistency test on the first variable of Operational costs of Port ………………...27
Table 15 Performance Standards of port operation ………………………………………………….28
Table 16 First HOQ Linking customer requirements and standards performance of port…………...30
Table 17 Second HOQ Linking standard performance of port and resilience measures…………….30
Table 18 Resilience measures of marine port………………………………………………………..31
Table 19 Analysis of developing a seaport logistics resilience system………………………………33
Table 20 Percentage of total domestic commodity loads in Indonesia′s 5 main ports 2015-2017…..38
Table 21 Seaport competitiveness……………………………………………………………………48
Table 22 Respondent data for questionnaire distribution AHP ……………………………………...50
Table 23 Tabulation of data on the assessment of seaport resilience criteria by all respondents……53
Table 24 Normalization test of port resilience criteria data …………………………………………54
Table 25 Consistency test of port resilience criteria data ……………………………………………55
Table 26 Tabulation of data on the assessment of seaport competitiveness criteria ………………...56
Table 27 Normalization test of port competitiveness criteria data …………………………………..57
Table 28 Consistency test of port competitiveness criteria data …………………………………….57
Table 29 Respondent data for questionnaire distribution IOT Framework ………………………….62
Table 30 Comparison of Maritime Transportation Industry Conditions …………………………….65

參考文獻

America’s Marine Highway Report to Congress, (2011), MARAD AMH Report to Congress. Available online: https://www.marad.dot.gov . (Accessed on 20 March 2017).
Acciaro, M., Mckinnon, A., (2013), Efficient Hinterland Transport Infrastructure and Services for Large Container Ports. International Transport Forum European Conference of Minister of Transport. Port Investment and Container Shipping Markets Roundtable: Hamburg, Germany. Discussion Paper No. 2013-19: 18-25.
Allen, J., Thorne, G., Browne, M., (2007), Good Practice Guide on Urban Freight Transport. BESTUFS.NET: Rijswijk, The Netherlands. Available online: https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/91w49/bestufs-. (Accessed on 18 August 2019)
Ancor Suárez-Alemán, Tomás Serebrisky & Oscar Ponce De León, (2018), Port competition in Latin America and the Caribbean: the role of concessions and competition policy, Maritime Policy & Management. 45 (5): 665-683.
Andersson D., Roso V., (2016), Developing Dry Ports Through the Use of Value-Added Services. In: Clausen U., Friedrich H., Thaller C., Geiger C. (eds) Commercial Transport. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham.
Azevedo, S.G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V., (2013), Ecosilient Index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. Journal of Clean Production. 56: 131–146.
Ballis, A., Golias, J., (2002), Comparative Evaluation of Existing and Innovative Rail–Road Freight Transport Terminals. Journal of Transport Research Part A. 36: 593–611.
Berle, Ø., Rice, J.B., Asbjørnslett, B., (2011), Failure modes in the maritime transportation system: a functional approach to throughput vulnerability. Maritime Policy Management. 38: 605–632.
Beresford, A., Petit, S., Xu, Q., Williams, S., (2012), A Study of Dry Port Development in China. Journal of Maritime Economy Logistic. 14: 73–98.
Bichou, K., Gray, R., (2005), A Critical Review of Conventional Terminology for Classifying Seaports. Journal of Transport Research Part A: Policy Practice. 39: 75–92.
Bottani, E., Rizzi, A., (2006), Strategic management of logistics service: a fuzzy QFD approach. International Journal of Production Economy. 103: 585–599.
BPS RI., (2019), Seaports Data in Indonesia. Available online: https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2019/., 2019. (Accessed on 27 January 2019).
Büyüközkan, G., Cifci, G., (2013), An integrated QFD framework with multiple formatted and incomplete preferences: a sustainable supply chain application. Applied Software Computer. 13: 3931–3941.
Carvalho, H., Barroso, A.P., Machado, V.H., Azevedo, S., Cruz-Machado, V., (2012), Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation. Computer Industrial Engineering. 62: 329–341.
Celik, M., Cebi, S., Kahraman, C., Er, I.D., (2009), An integrated fuzzy QFD model proposal on routing of shipping investment decisions in crude oil tanker market. Expert System Applied. 36: 6227–6235.
Cetin, K., Cerit, A.G., (2010), Organisational Effectiveness at Seaports: A System Approach. Journal of Maritime Policy Management. 37: 195–219.
Chang et al., (2008), Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Marine Policy. 32: 877–88.
Chen, L., Deng, X., (2018), A Modified Method for Evaluating Sustainable Transport Solutions Based on AHP and Dempster–Shafer Evidence Theory. Applied Science. 8: 563.
Chiu, R.H., Lin, L., Ting, S., (2014), Evaluation of Green Port Factors and Performance: A Fuzzy AHP Analysis. Mathematics Problem Engineering. 12: 802-976.
Chou et al., (2007), A fuzzy MCDM method for solving marine transshipment container port selection problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 186: 435–444.
Crainic, T.G., Dell’olmo, P., Ricciardi, N., Sgalambro, A., (2015), Modeling dry port based freight distribution planning. Transport Research Part C: Emergency Technology. 55: 518–534.
Cruijssen, F.; Cools, M.; Dullaert, W., (2007), Horizontal Cooperation in Logistics: Opportunities and Impediments. Journal Transport Research Part E. 43: 129–142.
Ding, J.-F., (2009), Applying fuzzy quality function deployment (QFD) to identify solutions of service delivery system for port of Kaohsiung. Qualitative and Quantitative. 43(4): 553–570.
Dooms, M., Van Der Lugt, L., De Langen, P.W., (2013), International strategies of port authorities: The case of the Port of Rotterdam. Transport Business Management. 8: 148–157.
FDT., (2007), Feasibility Study on the Network Operation of Hinterland Hubs (Dry Port Concept) to Improve and Modernize Ports’ Connections to the Hinterland and to Improve Networking. In Project - Integrating Logistics Centre Networks in the Baltic Sea Region, The Centre of Maritime Studies (CMS) of the University of Turku. Turku, Finland. 21–64.
Frost, J.D., (2010), The Close Dry Port Concept and the Canadian Context. Journal Maritime Economy Logistics. 10: 108–129.
Fruth, M., Teuteberg, F., (2017), Digitization in maritime logistics—What is there and what is missing?, Cogent Business Management. 4: 141-166.
Haralambides, H.E., Gujar, G., (2016), Dry Port Efficiency and Container Security. In Proceedings of the IAME, Santiago, Chile.
Heaver, T., (2001), The Evolving Roles of Shipping Lines in International Logistics. Journal of Maritime Economy. 4: 210–230.
Heilig, L., Voß, S., (2016), Inter-Terminal Transportation: An Annotated Bibliography and Research Agenda. Flexible Service Manufacture Journal. 28: 1–29.
Henry, D., Ramirez-Marquez, J., (2012), Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliability Engineering System. 99: 114–122.
Henttu, V., Multaharju, S., (2011), Transshipment Costs of Intermodal Transport in Finnish Context. Tutkimusraportti Research Report Finland: Faculty of Technology Management, Department of Industrial Management. Lappeenranta University of Technology: Lappeenranta, Findland. 19–32.
Huang, S.T., Bulut, E., Duru, O., Hwan, C.N.Y., Yoshida, S., (2015), Service quality assessment in liner shipping industry: an empirical study on Asian shipping case. International Journal Shipping & Transport Logistics. 7: 221–242.
Ince H., (2013), The Impact of ERP Systems and Supply Chain Management Practices on Firm Performance: Case of Turkish Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 99: 1124 – 1133
Ishizaka, A., Labib, A., (2011), Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Expert System Application. 38: 14336–14345.
Jang Hyun Kim, Minju Yoo, Kang Nyeon Lee, Hogeun Seo., (2017), The innovation of the internet: a semantic network analysis of the Internet of Things. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. Access : https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2017.1302549
Jarzemskis, A., Vailiauskas, V., (2007), Research on Dry Port Concept as Intermodal Node. Journal of Transport Economy. 22: 207–213.
Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,, Jing Dai., (2015), "Environmental sustainability of logistics service provider: an ANP-QFD approach", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26 (2): 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2013-0088
Jeevan, J., Chen, S.L., Cahoon, S., (2019), The impact of dry port operations on container seaports competitiveness. Maritime Economy Logistics. 46: 4–23.
Kandananond K., (2014), A Roadmap to Green Supply Chain System Through Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation. Procedia Engineering. 69: 377 – 382
Kementerian Perhubungan RI, (2013), Available online: http://www.dephub.go.id/ ., (Accessed on 20 March 2017).
Klink, H.A., (2007), Optimisation of land access to sea ports. In Proceedings of the Land Access to Sea Ports. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 10–17.
Kusuma, LTWN., Liu, Jun-Der., Tseng, Fu-Shiang., (2018), Advanced ERP Application for Marine Transportation Industry in the South Asia Pacific Country; a Case Study. The 11th International Seminar Industrial & Engineering Management (ISIEM). Published on IOP Science Journal. 11: 49.
Kusuma, LTWN., Tseng, Fu- Shiang., (2019), Design of Marine Port Logistics Resilience System in Archipelago Countries Face of Industry 4.0 Era. Smart Enterprise Information Application Development International Conference. NCCU Taiwan. 2: 10.
Lam, J., Siu, L., Bai, X., (2016), A quality function deployment approach to improve maritime supply chain resilience. Transport Research Part E: Logistics Transport. 92: 16–27.
Lee, T., Yeo, G.T., Thai, V.V., (2014), Structural Analysis of Port Brand Equity Using Structural Equation Modeling. Asian Journal of Shipping Logistics. 30: 349–372.
Liang, G.S., Ding, J.F., Wang, C.K., (2012), Applying fuzzy quality function deployment to prioritize solutions of knowledge management for an international port in Taiwan. Knowledge Based System. 33: 83–91.
Liao, C.-N., Kao, H.-P., (2014), An evaluation approach to logistics service using fuzzy theory, quality function development and goal programming. Computer and Industrial Engineering. 68, 54–64.
Lino, R.J., (2017), The role of IPC in developing multimodal transportation in java. Available online:https://www.slideshare.net/IndonesiaInfrastructure/the-role-of-ipc-in-developing-multimodal-transportation-in-java., (Accessed on 31 March 2017).
Lin, D.Y., Huang, K.L., (2017), An Equilibrium-Based Network Model for International Container Flows. Maritime Policy Management. 44: 1034–1055.
Lirn, T.C., Thanopoulou, H.A., Beynon, M.J., Beresford, A.K.C., (2004), An Application of AHP on Transshipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective. Journal Maritime Economy Logistics. 6: 70–91.
Meidute˙-Kavaliauskiene˙, I., Aranskis, A., Litvinenko, M., (2014), Consumer satisfaction with the quality of logistics services. Procedia Social Behaviour Sciences. 110: 330–340.
Ng, A.K., Gujar, G.C., (2009), Government Policy, Efficiency and Competitiveness: The Case Study of Ports in India. Journal of Transport Policy. 16: 232–239.
Ng, A.K.Y., Cetin, B., (2012), Locational Characteristics of Dry Ports in Developing Economies: Some Lessons from Northern India. Journal of Regional Studies. 46: 757–773.
Notteboom, T. , (2006) The Time Factor in Liner Shipping Services. Maritime Economy Logistics. 8: 19–39.
Notteboom, T., Rodrigue, J.P., (2005), Port Regionalization: Towards a New Phase in Port Development. Journal of Maritime Policy Management. 32: 297–313.
Notteboom, T., Rodrigue, J., (2009), Inland Terminals within North American and European Supply Chains; United Nations: Transport and Communication Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok, Thailand. 98–115.
Notteboom, T.E., Winkelmans, W., (2001), Structural Changes in Logistics: How Will Port Authorities Face the Challenge? Maritime Policy Management. 28: 71–89.
McCalla, R., (2005), Factors Influencing the Landward Movement of Containers: The Cases of Halifax and Vancouver. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ports, China: Cities and Global Supply Chains, Hong Kong. 121–137.
Migliardi, A., Beretta, E., Vacche, A.D., (2013), The Port of Genoa: A Gateway for the North West of Italy. In Proceedings of the IAME, Marseille, France.
Padilha, P., Ng, A.K., (2012), The Spatial Evolution of Dry Ports in Developing Economies. The Brazilian Experience. Journal of Maritime Economy Logistics. 14: 99–121.
Paixao, A.C., Marlow, P.B., (2003), Fourth Generation Ports: A Question of Agility? International Journal of Physics Distribution and Logistics Management. 33: 355–376.
Pant, R., Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Rocco, C.M., (2014), Stochastic measures of resilience and their application to container terminals. Computer and Industrial Engineering. 70: 183–194.
Pelindo Company, (2017), Annual Report. Available online: http://www.indonesiaport.co.id/sub/annual-report.html. (Accessed on 20 March 2017),
Protopapas, A., Kruse, C.J., Olson, L.E., Donelan, M.B., Hutson, N., (2012), Marine Highway Transport of Toxic Inhalation Hazard Materials. Transport Research Record. 2326: 1–7.
R. Rajendran,, V. Kalaiarasi,, M. Amaravathi., (2015), Determinants of ERP Implementation and System Success in India: A Case Study. Journal of Cases on Information Technology. 17: 35-52
Rajesh and Malliga., (2013), Supplier Selection based on AHP QFD Methodology. Procedia Engineering. 64: 1283-1292.
Rodrigue, J.P., Notteboom, T., (2009), The Terminalization of Supply Chains: Reassessing the Role of Terminals in Port-Hinterland Logistical Relationships. Journal of Maritime Policy Management. 36: 165–183.
Rodrigue, J.P., Notteboom, T., (2010), Foreland-Based Regionalization: Integrating Intermediate Hubs with Port Hinterlands. Research Transport Economic. 27: 19–29.
Rodrigue, J.P., Notteboom, T., (2012), Dry Ports in European and North American Intermodal Rail Systems: Two of a Kind? Research Transport & Business Management. 5: 4–15.
Rodrigue, J.P., (2006), Transportation Modes. In The Geography of Transport System, 1st ed.; Taylor and Francis Group: New York, NY, USA. 212–240.
Rondinelli., (2000), Multimodal Transportation, Logistics, and the Environment: Managing Interactions in a Global Economy. European Management Journal. 18 (4): 398–410.
Roso, V., Lumsden, K., (2010), A Review of Dry Ports. Journal of Maritime Economy Logistics. 12: 196–213.

Roso, V., (2008), Factors Influencing Implementation of a Dry Port. International Journal of Physics Distribution and Logistics Management. 38: 782–798.
Roso, V., Woxenius, J., Lumsden, K., (2009), The Dry Port Concept: Connecting Container Seaports with the Hinterland. Journal of Transport Geographics. 17: 338–345.
Roso, V., Russell, D., Ruamsook, K., Stefansson, G., (2015), Seaport-Inland Port Dyad Dynamics: An Investigation of Service Provisions and Intermodal Transportation Linkages. World Review of Intermodal Transport Research. 5: 263–280.
Ruan, X., Feng, X., Pang, K., (2017), Development of Port Service Network in OBOR via Capacity Sharing: An Idea from Zhejiang Province in China. Maritime Policy Management. 1–20.
Saaty, T.L., (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process; New York: McGraw Hill. International, Translated to Russian, Portuguese, and Chinese, Revised editions, Paperback (1996, 2000); RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Seetha Raman, Nitin Patwa, Indu Niranjan, Ujjwal Ranjan, Krishna Moorthy, Ami Mehta., (2018), Impact of big data on supply chain management, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21 (6): 579-596, DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2018.1459523
Stietencrona, M, V., Røstad, C, C., Henriksen, B., Thoben, K, D., (2017), Utilizing the Internet of Things for the Management of Through-life Engineering Services on Marine Auxiliaries. Procedia CIRP, 59: 233 – 239.
Tongzon, J., (2009), Port Choice and Freight Forwarders. Transport Research Part E: Logistics Transport Review. 45: 186–195.
UNESCAP, KMI., (2007), Logistic Sector Development: Planning Models for Enterprises and Logistic Clusters. Thailand: New York and Korean Maritime Institute. United Nations; UNESCAP: Bangkok, Thailand.
UNESCAP., (2010), The Development of Dry Ports along the Asian Highway and Trans-Asian Railway Networks. United Nation Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. United Nation; UNESCAP: Bangkok, Thailand
Verhoeven, P., (2010), A Review of Port Authority Functions: Towards a Renaissance? Maritime Policy Management. 37: 247–270.
Vernimmen, B., Dullaert, W., Engelen, S., (2007), Schedule Unreliability in Liner Shipping: Origins and Consequences for the Hinterland Supply Chain. Journal of Maritime Economy Logistics. 9: 193–213.
Visser, J., Konings, R., Pielage, B.J., Wiegmans, B., (2009), A New Hinterland Transport Concept for the Port Rotterdam: Organisational or Technological Challenges? Journal of Transport Research. 4: 201–216.
Wan, Y., Zhang, A., Li, K.X., (2018), Port Competition with Accessibility and Congestion: A Theoretical Framework and Literature Review on Empirical Studies. Maritime Policy Management. 45: 239–259.
Werikhe, G.W., Jin, Z., (2015), A Comparative Study of Dry Ports in East Africa and China. Development Country Studies. 5: 7–17.
Wisetjindawat, W., Sano, K., Matsumoto, S., Raothanachonkun, P., (2007), Micro-Simulation Model for Modeling Freight Agents Interactions in Urban Freight Movement. In Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.
World Population Review., (2019), Island Country 2019. Available online: http://worldpopulationreview. com/countries/island-countries/. (Accessed on 17 April 2019).
World Bank., (2018), Indonesia Logistics Reform. Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/. (Accessed on 27 January 2019).
Woxenius, J., Roso, V., Lumsden, K., (2004), The Dry Port Concept–Connecting Seaports with Their Hinterland by Rail. In Proceedings of the ICLSP Conference Proceedings, Dalian, Department of Transportation and Logistics Chalmers University of Technology. 305–319.
Xing, W., Liu, Q., Chen, G., (2018), Pricing Strategies for Port Competition and Cooperation. Maritime Policy Management. 45: 260–277.
Xisong, D., Gang, X., Yisheng, Lv., (2013), Intelligent ports based on Internet of Things. (Acces:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6611428)
Zhou H., Liu B., Wang D., (2012), Design and Research of Urban Intelligent Transportation System Based on the Internet of Things. In: Wang Y., Zhang X. (eds) Internet of Things. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 312.

指導教授

曾富祥

審核日期

2019-12-4

推文