| 摘要(英) |
This study discusses about how the firms who take corporate social responsibility into account can affect government’s optimal decision of pollution tax. There will be two environments to be analyzed, namely in the monopoly and foreign direct investment. In monopoly market, the more CSR the domestic firm is aware of, the lower the optimal pollution tax is. However, when foreign firm is allowed to invest directly in domestic country, the result is opposite.
Our results show that if the market scale is large enough, the government tends to open the market, and agrees foreign firm to do FDI; but if the market scale is not large, then the firm of different level concern of CSR will lead to different results. For instance, when domestic firm starts to emphasize more on CSR, the local government tends to open the market for FDI. Nevertheless, the foreign firm cannot afford the pollution tax when it gets too high. Thus, the government will have no choice but to set the prohibition tax, then the domestic firm monopolize the market. Only when the domestic firm shows less concern about CSR, with the foreign firm highly concerning CSR, and the difference between their awareness is big enough, then the government can set a pollution tax which makes domestic firm monopolize the market. |
| 參考文獻 |
陳良志 (2010)，兩岸直銷業實行企業社會責任之比較 — 以安利中國為例，國 立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程企管組商學碩士學位論文。
謝泊泓 (2018)，環境企業社會責任與最適出口政策，國立中央大學經濟學系碩 士學位論文。
Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C. and M. B. Garzón (2017) “Environmental Policy, North-South Trade and FDI” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 17, 371-386.
Baron, D. P. (2001),“Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(1),7-45.
Borensztein, E., J-W. Lee, and J. De Gregorio (1998), “How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?” NBER Working Paper No.5057.
Conrad, K. (2005) “Price Competition and Product Differentiation when Consumers Care for the Environment,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 31(1),1-19.
Constantine, M., E. Mitrokostas, and P. Emmanuel (2018), “Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility by a Multinational Firm,” DICE Discussion Papers, No 246, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
Dong, B., J. Gong, and X. Zhao (2012) “FDI and Environmental Regulation: Pollution Haven or a Race to the Top?” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 41(2), 216-237.
Jinji, N. (2005), “Strategic Environmental and Trade Policies with Corporate Environmentalism,” Discussion Papers 2004-10, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
Jinji, N. (2013) “Is Corporate Environmentalism Good for Domestic Welfare?” Review of International Economics, 21(5), 901-911.
Kalamova, M. and N. Johnstone (2011), “Envionmental Policy Stringency and Foreign Direct Investment,” OECD Environment Working Papers, 33, OECD Publishing.
Kim, Y. and D.-E. Rhee (2019) “Do Stringent Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries? Evidence on the ‘Race to the Top’ from Cross-Country Panel Data,” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(12), 2796-2808.
Lyon, T. P. and J. W. Maxwell (2004) “Corporate Environmentalism and Public Policy,” Human Ecology Review, 11(3), 292-294.
Matthew, A., R. Cole, J. R. Elliott, and P. G. Fredriksson (2006), “Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Policy?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(1), 157-178.
Yang, Y.-P. and T.-H. Tsai (2013) “Does a Stricter Environmental Policy Discourage Foreign Direct Investment?” Taiwan Economic Review, 41(2), 137-165. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit