運用企業架構為化學產業整合精實製造、數位化及永續發展

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：11

、訪客IP：18.222.21.160

姓名

廖明輝(Ming-Hui Liao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

運用企業架構為化學產業整合精實製造、數位化及永續發展
(Using Enterprise Architecture to Integrate Lean Manufacturing, Digitalization, and Sustainability for Chemical Industries)

相關論文

★ 半導體化學材料銷售策略分析-以跨國B化工公司為例	★ TFT-LCD CELL製程P檢點燈不良解析流程改善之關聯法則應用
★ 金融風暴時期因應長鞭效應的策略 –以X公司為例	★ 勞動生產力目標訂定之研究-DEA 資料包絡法應用
★ 應用田口方法導入低溫超薄ITO透明導電膜於電容式觸控面板之研究	★ 多階不等效平行機台排程與訂單決策
★ 多準則決策之應用-以雷射半導體產業為例	★ 專案管理模式進行品管圈活動-以半導體機台保養測機流程改善為例
★ 應用e8D降低不合格品之效益分析-以快速消費品製造為例	★ 供應商評選模式之建構-以塑膠射出成型機製造為例
★ 應用協同規劃預測補貨於伺服器備品存貨改善之研究－以Q代工公司為例	★ 船用五金拋光作業之生產規劃
★ 以SCOR模型探討汽車安全輔助系統供應鏈-以A公司採購作業改善為例	★ 研發補助計畫執行成效評估之研究以「工業基礎技術專案計畫」為例
★ 運用生態效益發展永續之耳機產業	★ 失效模式設計審查(DRBFM)之應用-以筆記型電腦為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

化學產業提供各式各樣的產品與服務以維持全球經濟發展，但同時也消耗大量原物料資源與能源。化學產業目前正面臨巨大壓力要轉型成為精實企業，不僅要能執行傳統的精實製造理念，更要推動新興的數位化和永續發展競爭策略，這些都是全球化學公司在未來市場競爭和發展所必需具備的核心能力。然而在實務上卻很少看到化學公司成功進行企業轉型的個案，以至於獲取這些企業轉型的案例細節，幾乎已成為不可能的任務。因此，對於化學產業如何進行精實企業轉型的嚴重缺乏了解，為本研究提供強大的研究動機；本研究運用開放組織架構框架（TOGAF），對一家大型跨國化學公司的實際企業轉型個案，進行深入個案研究並萃取該公司建構精實企業所採用的架構框架與模型。
個案研究從建立精實企業架構框架原則開始，確定受營運轉型影響的組織與部門，接者進入願景階段，考量所有利害關係人的永續發展價值與營運驅動力，創建企業使命、營運策略和目標。然後針對精實企業架構依序發展三種架構框架：用於核心業務領域的營運架構、用於應用程序和數據的資訊系統架構、及用於數位化技術的技術架構。最後進行差距分析以識別現有架構和目標架構的主要差異，並啟動移轉計劃分析轉型的潛在成本與風險及需要因應的行動方案。本個案在研究過程，兼顧精實製造以人為本的持續改善企業文化並應用數位化技術進行企業架構的流程優化，目的在於促進全球化學產業達成聯合國永續發展目標。
本研究在企業永續轉型領域的主要貢獻為：（一）、對於計畫進行類似企業轉型的化學公司，提供客製化的精實企業架構框架，可作為化學產業進行企業轉型參考藍圖。（二）、協助化學產業建立整合精實製造、數位化、永續發展的精實企業模型，以瞭解並掌握精實製造、數位化和永續發展之間錯綜複雜的動態關係。

摘要(英)

The chemical industry has sustained the development of global economies by providing an astonishing variety of products and services, while also consuming massive amounts of raw materials and energy. Chemical firms are currently under tremendous pressure to become lean enterprises capable of executing not only traditional lean manufacturing practices but also emerging competing strategies of digitalization and sustainability. All of these are core competencies required for chemical firms to compete and thrive in future markets. Unfortunately, reports of successful transformation are so rare among chemical firms that acquiring the details of these cases would seem an almost impossible mission. The severe lack of knowledge about these business transformations thus provided a strong motivation for this research.
Using The Open Group Architecture Framework, we performed an in-depth study on a real business transformation occurring at a major international chemical corporation, extracting the architecture framework possibly adopted by this firm to become a lean enterprise. This comprehensive case study resulted in two major contributions to the field of sustainable business transformation: (1) a custom lean enterprise architecture framework applicable to common chemical firms making a similar transformation, and (2) a lean enterprise model developed to assist chemical firms in comprehending the intricate and complicated dynamics between lean manufacturing, digitalization, and sustainability.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業架構
★ 永續發展
★ 數位化
★ 精實企業
★ 開放組織架構框架

關鍵字(英)

★ enterprise architecture
★ sustainability
★ digitalization
★ lean enterprise
★ The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)

論文目次

Abstract .............................................i
Acknowledgments ......................................iii
Contents .............................................iv
List of Figures ......................................vi
List of Tables .......................................vii
Chapter 1 Introduction ...............................1
1-1 Background .......................................1
1-2 Research Objective ...............................2
1-3 Chemical Industries Status and Challenges ........3
1-4 Research Motivation ..............................5
1-5 Research Questions ...............................6
Chapter 2 Literature Review ..........................8
2-1 Enterprise Architecture (EA) .....................8
2-2 Sustainability in the Chemical Industry ..........12
2-3 Digitalization in the Chemical Industry ..........14
2-4 Lean Enterprise ..................................16
Chapter 3 Research Methodology .......................19
3-1 TOGAF ADM ........................................19
3-2 ArchiMate Modeling Tool ..........................21
3-3 Visual Paradigm with TOGAF ADM and ArchiMate .....22
Chapter 4 Case Study .................................25
4-1 Case Company .....................................25
4-2 Architecture vision, Principles & Readiness Assessment ......................................................27
4-3 Target Enterprise Architecture ...................31
4-4 Gap Analysis .....................................38
4-5 Migration Plan ...................................40
Chapter 5 Research Contributions .....................44
5-1 Lean Enterprise Architecture Framework for Chemical Industries ...........................................44
5-2 Lean Enterprise Model for Chemical Industries ....48
5-3 Main Contributions for Chemical Industries .......52
Chapter 6 Conclusions ................................54
6-1 Main Results .....................................54
6-2 Limitations and Directions for Future Research ...55
References ...........................................56

參考文獻

1. Abunadi, I., “Enterprise Architecture Best Practices in Large Corporations”, Information, Vol 10, 293, 2019.
2. Aksin-Sivrikaya, S., Bhattacharya, C.B, “Where Digitalization Meets Sustainability: Opportunities and Challenges”, Sustainability in a Digital World, pp. 37–49, Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2017.
3. Alliance to End Plastic Waste, Committed to Act with a Clear Vision, 2019, Available online: https://endplasticwaste.org/ (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
4. American Chemistry Council, The Responsible Care Guiding Principles, 1988, Available online: https://responsiblecare.americanchemistry.com/ (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
5. Ansyori, R., Qodarsih, N., Soewito, B., “A systematic literature review: Critical Success Factors to Implement Enterprise Architecture”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol 135, pp. 43–51, 2018.
6. Bartels, R., Bjacek, P., Sarathy, V., Elser, B, Catalyzing the New—Driving Chemical Industry Growth in an Era of Epic Disruption, Accenture Chemicals: London, UK, 2018.
7. Carpi, R., Littmann, A., Chemicals Manufacturing 2030+: More of the Same . . . but Different, McKinsey & Company: Lisbon, Portugal, 2020.
8. Cefic-The European Chemical Industry Council, 2019 Sustainability Progress Report of the European Chemical Industry Council, The European Chemical Industry Council: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
9. Digital McKinsey, Digital Manufacturing—Escaping Pilot Purgatory, McKinsey & Company: Chicago, IL, USA, 2018.
10. Cooper, G., Kosasi, S., Sulsatri, K., “Enterprise Architecture: Key to Successful Digital Business Transformation”, In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System, pp. 156–161, Bali, Indonesia, 22–23 August 2019.
11. Dombrowski, U., Krenkel, P., Ebentreich, D., “Link mechanisms within the Lean Enterprise”, Procedia CIRP, Vol 57, pp. 601–606, 2016.
12. Dombrowski, U., Wullbrandt, J., Fochler, S., “Center of Excellence for Lean Enterprise 4.0”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol 31, pp. 66–71, 2019.
13. EA Pad, The EA3 Cube Approach, 2015, Available online: https://eapad.dk/ea3-cube/overview/ (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
14. Ehrenfeld, J.R., Sustainability by Design: A Subversive Strategy for Transforming Our Consumer Culture, Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2009.
15. Elkington, J., The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add up? Chapter 1 Enter the Triple Bottom Line, 2017, Available online: https://www.johnelkington.com/archive/TBL-elkington-chapter.pdf (Accessed on 6 March 2020).
16. Flaherty, J.E., Peter Drucker: Shaping the Managerial Mind, Jossey-Bass In: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999.
17. Goerzig, D., Bauernhansl, T., “Enterprise architectures for the digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises”, Procedia CIRP, Vol 67, pp. 540–545, 2018.
18. Haghighathoseini, A., Bobarshad, H., Saghaf, F., Rezaei, M.S., Bagherzadeh, N., “Hospital Enterprise architecture framework (Study of Iranian University Hospital Organization)”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol 114, pp. 88–100, 2018.
19. Keller,W., Bette, N., “Shaping digital sustainable development in chemical companies”, Journal of Business Chemistry, Vol 1, pp. 9–18, 2020.
20. Kiron, D., Unruh, G., The Convergence of Digitalization and Sustainability, 2018, Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-convergence-of-digitalization-and-sustainability/ (Accessed on 2 March 2020).
21. Klei, A., Moder, M., Stockdale, O., Weihe, U., Winkler, G., Digital in Chemicals: From Technology to Impact, McKinsey & Company: Zurich, Switzerland, 2017.
22. Kramer, J.P., Nellen, J., Schrapers, M., Cruz, A., Digital Transformation in the Workplace of the European Chemicals Sector, Prognos AG: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
23. Lee, S., Oh, S.W., Nam, K., “Transformational and Transactional Factors for the Successful Implementation of Enterprise Architecture in Public Sector”, Sustainability, Vol 8, 456, 2016.
24. Masuda, Y., Shirasak, S., Yamamoto, S., Hardjono, T., “Architecture Board Practices in Adaptive Enterprise Architecture with Digital Platform: A Case of Global Healthcare Enterprise”, International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, Vol 14, pp. 1–20, 2018.
25. McKinsey & Company, Unlocking Success in Digital Transformations, 2018, Available online:https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Organization/Our%20Insights/Unlocking%20success%20in%20digital%20transformations/Unlocking-success-in-digital-transformations.ashx (Accessed on 1 March 2020).
26. Meincke, H., Nickel, J.P., Falter, W., Keller, A., Chemistry 4.0 Growth through Innovation in a Transforming World, German Chemical Industry Association (VCI): Frankfurt, Germany, 2017.
27. Meincke, H., Nickel, J.P., Westerheide, P., “Chemistry 4.0—Growth through innovation in a transforming world”, Journal of Business Chemistry, Vol 15 (1), pp. 42–53, 2018.
28. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO Architecture Framework Version 4, 2018, Available online: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_157575.htm (Accessed on 2 March 2020).
29. Oxford Economics, “The Global Chemical Industry: Catalyzing Growth and Addressing Our World’s Sustainability Challenges”, International Council of Chemical Associations: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
30. Peleman, S., “A holistic framework and development agenda for accelerated transition towards a sustainable chemical industry”, Journal of Business Chemistry, Vol 16 (3), pp. 165–179, 2019.
31. Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy, About PACE, 2018, Available online: https://pacecircular.org/ (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
32. Qurratuaini, H., “Designing enterprise architecture based on TOGAF 9.1 framework”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Applied Technology, pp. 1–11, Mataram, Indonesia, 29–30 November 2017.
33. Rogers, C., Proposed Enterprise Architecture Solutions for Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Simulation Information Assets Based on TOGAF, University of Denver University College: Denver, CO, USA, 2016.
34. Royal DSM, Integrated Annual Report 2018, 2018, Available online: https://annualreport.dsm.com/ar2018/en_US/index.html (Accessed on 4 March 2020).
35. S A Partners, Transform Model: Assess & Enterprise Excellence Model, 2016, Available online: https://sapartners.com/transform-model-assess/ (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
36. Schreiber, B., Romanus, W., Lee, Y., Integrating Lean Principles into Digital Transformation, Arthur D Little PRISM: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
37. Tabrizi, B., Lam, E., Girard, K.,Irvin, V.,” Digital Transformation Is Not About Technology”, Harvard. Business Review, 13 March 2019.
38. Taucean, I.M., Tamasila, M., Ivascu, L., Miclea, S., Negrut, M., “Integrating Sustainability and Lean: SLIM Method and Enterprise Game Proposed”, Sustainability, Vol 11, 2103, 2019.
39. The Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations, “A Common Perspectives on Enterprise Architecture”, Architecture and Governance Magazine, Issue 9-4, pp. 11–17, 2013.
40. The Open Group, Business Transformation Enablement Program, 2018, Available online: https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap26.html (Accessed on 6 March 2020).
41. The Open Group, The TOGAF Standard Version 9.2. 5. Preliminary Phase, 2018, Available online: https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf92-doc/arch/chap05.html (Accessed on 5 March 2020).
42. The Open Group, The TOGAF Standard, TOGAF Part I: Introduction, 1995, Available online: https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap01.html (Accessed on 2 March 2020).
43. The Open Group, The TOGAF Standard - Introduction to the ADM, 2008, Available online: https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap04.html (Accessed on 2 March 2020).
44. Thienen, S.V., Clinton, A., Mahto, M., Sniderman, B., Industry 4.0 and the Chemicals Industry: Catalyzing Transformation through Operations Improvement and Business Growth, Deloitte University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016.
45. Together for Sustainability Initiative, What is TfS?, 2011, Available online: https://tfs-initiative.com/ (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
46. United Nations: The 17 Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform, 2015, Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
47. University of Minnesota, Enterprise Architecture Structures to support strategic, mission-focused technology decisions, 2018, Available online: https://it.umn.edu/experts-communities/enterprise-architecture (Accessed on 2 March 2020).
48. Urbaczewski, L., Mrdalj, S., “A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks”, Information Systems Journal, Vol 7 (2), pp. 18–23, 2006.
49. US Department of Defense, The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02, 2010, Available online: https://dodcio.defense.gov/Library/DoD-Architecture-Framework/ (Accessed on 2 March 2020).
50. US Department of the Treasury, Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework, United States Department of the Treasury: Washington DC, USA, 2000.
51. US Federal Chief Information Officers Council, The Common Approach to Federal Enterprise Architecture, Executive Office of the President of the United States: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
52. Uysal, M.P., Sogut, M.Z., “An integrated research for architecture-based energy management in sustainable airports”, Energy, Vol 140, pp. 1387–1397. 2017.
53. VCI, BAVC, IG BCE, Chemie³ - The sustainability initiative of the German chemical industry: Ambitions. Achievements. Solutions, 2013, Available online: https://www.chemiehoch3.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Home/Presse/Publikationen/chemiehoch3-publikationen-branchenbericht2013-en.pdf (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
54. Verdouw, C., Sundmaeker, H., Tekinerdogan, B., Conzon, D., Montanaro, T., “Architecture framework of IoT-based food and farm systems: A multiple case study”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol 165, 104939, 2019.
55. Visual Paradigm, Working with TOGAF ADM Guide-through, 2019, Available online: https://circle.visual-paradigm.com/docs/togaf-adm-guide-through/working-with-togaf-adm-guide-through/ (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
56. Visual Paradigm, What is ArchiMate, 2019, Available online: https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/archimate/what-is-archimate (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
57. Vollmer, M., “The road ahead: Digitalization fuels innovation”, Journal of Business Chemistry, Vol 15 (1), pp. 24–26, 2018.
58. Wadyalkar, S., “3 Megatrends in the Chemical Industry”, 2018, Available online: https://blog.marketresearch.com/3-megatrends-in-the-chemical-industry (Accessed on 28 February 2020).
59. Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., McAfee, A., Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for Billion-Dollar Organizations, MIT Center for Digital Business and Capgemini Consulting: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011.
60. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., “From Lean Production to the Lean Enterprise”, Harvard Business Review, Vol 3, pp. 93–103, 1994.
61. Womack, J. P., Operation - Take the Value-Stream Walk: Presentation by Jim Womack, 2011, Available online: https://www.industryweek.com/operations/continuous-improvement/video/21963618/take-the-valuestream-walk-presentation-by-jim-womack (Accessed on 3 March 2020).
62. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Chemical Sector SDG Roadmap, World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
63. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, 1987 Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (Accessed on 6 March 2020).
64. Yankovitz, D., Dickson, D., Hussain, A., Achieving the Next Frontier of Chemicals Excellence—Digital Maturity Model to Help Ease the Transition, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited: London, UK, 2019.
65. Zachman, J., The Concise Definition of the Zachman Framework, 2008, Available online: https://zachman.com/about-the-zachman-framework (Accessed on 2 March 2020).

指導教授

王啟泰(Chi-Tai Wang)

審核日期

2021-6-15

推文