應用資料包絡分析法進行永續供應鏈績效評估

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：5

、訪客IP：3.149.247.166

姓名

范美娘(Mei-Niang Fan) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

應用資料包絡分析法進行永續供應鏈績效評估
(Using DEA Model to Evaluate Supply Chain Sustainability)

相關論文

★ 企業流程為核心的食品產業運籌體系規劃:低溫物流部份	★ 以企業流程方法規劃整體飛航後勤維修體系之研究
★ 成衣產業導入ERP運籌管理方案之個案研究	★ 光電產業試產基地之生產最佳化模式：以光投影機為例
★ TFT LCD產業獲利因素之探討	★ 科技事業進行合併/讓售之決策過程與成效之個案探討
★ 企業治理、風險及遵循解決方案導入之個案研究-以職責分離資訊系統為例	★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用
★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響	★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析
★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響	★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響	★ 電子產業新產品開發參考模式之發展
★ 應用資料科學方法提昇國防裝備可靠度之研究－以防空系統為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

永續主要是由經濟、環境及社會三個構面所組成的，有鑑於過往的企業的營運只以獲利來衡量經營管理績效，來自利益相關者的需求驅使下，企業不能只考量財務的表現來衡量永續管理績效，而對於全球化的製造工廠來說更是一大挑戰，要如何衡量公司以這三個構面的企業的永續績效? 資料包絡分析法(data envelopment analysis)很廣泛在學術界以決策單位之使用投入產出之效率來研究探討及實務界進行模型應用。此研究是使用資料包絡分析法的非需求產出模式(bad-output model)及差額指標模式(slacks-based measure)來進行永續供應鏈績效評量，應用這兩個模式分析比較永續供應鏈績效，其結果並無顯著差異，資料包絡分析法是提供企業強化競爭優勢的工具之一，並持續不斷提升永續供應鏈的經營續效並貢獻後代子孫。

摘要(英)

Sustainability consists of three paradigms: economic, environment and social in operations, driven by stakeholders to create sustainable business, in contrast to the traditional operating model based on profit. It is a challenge for manufacturing enterprises to measure these three paradigms to benchmark their sustainable supply chain performance at multiple locations globally. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is widely studied and applied to evaluate the efficiency of decision making units. We apply bad-output model and slacks-based measure (SBM) for benchmarking the performance. The results show there is no difference between bad-output model and SBM for benchmarking the sustainable supply chain performance. Thus, DEA can increase the enterprise’s competitive advantage as a tool for driving continuous improvement toward supply chain excellence, thus contributing to the lives of future generations.

關鍵字(中)

★ 永續供應鏈
★ 資料包絡分析法
★ 非需求產出模式
★ 差額指標模式

關鍵字(英)

★ sustainable supply chain
★ data envelopment analysis (DEA)
★ bad-output model
★ slacks- based measure (SBM)

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
Acknowledgements iii
List of Figures v
List of Tables vi
Chapter I Introduction 1
Chapter II Literature review 4
2-1 Sustainable supply chain 4
2-2 Resource-based views (RBV) 7
2-3 Undesirable outputs of sustainable supply chains 8
Chapter III Methodology 11
3-1 Slacks-based measure (SBM) 11
3-2 Bad-output model 14
Chapter IV Model application 16
4-1 Case introduction 16
4-2 Model Setup 16
4-3 Results of SBM 19
4-3-1 Performance of SBM 19
4-3-2 Sensitivity analysis of SBM 22
4-4 Results of bad-output model 24
4-4-1 Performance of bad-output model 24
4-4-2 Sensitivity analysis of bad-output model 28
Chapter V Discussions of SBM and bad-output models 31
5-1 The scoring comparison 32
5-2 The slacks comparison 34
5-3 Sensitivity analysis’ comparison 39
Chapter VI Conclusions 47
References 50
Appendix A. Window analysis of bad-output model 58
Appendix B. Window analysis SBM 64

參考文獻

1. Asmild, M., Paradi, J.C., Aggarwall, V., and Schaffnit, C. (2004). “ Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist Index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry” , Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 67-89.
2. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. (1984). “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
3. Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
4. Cezarino, L. O., Murad, M. D., Resende, P. V., and Sales,W.F. (2020). “Being green makes me greener? An evaluation of sustainability rebound effects”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 121436.
5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1981). “Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through”, Management Science, 27(6), 668-697.
7. Chung, Y. H., Färe, R., and Grosskopf, S. (1997). “Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach”, Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229-240.
8. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. (2007). “Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and dea-solver software”, second ed. Springer, New York.
9. Corbett, C. J., and Kleindorfer, P. R. (2001). “Environmental management and operations management: introduction to part 1 (manufacturing and ecologistics)”, Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 107-111.
10. Dahlmann, F., and Rohrich, J. K. (2019). “ Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 1632-1647.
11. Dao, V., Langella, I., and Carbo, J. (2011). “From green to sustainability: information technology and an integrated sustainability framework”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 63-79.
12 Debbarma, J., Lee, H., and Choi, Y. (2021). Sustainable Feasibility of the Environmental-Friendly Policies on Agriculture and Its Related Sectors in India, Sustainability, 13(12), 6680.
13. Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico C. S., and Shale, E.A. (2001). “Pitfalls and protocols in dea”, European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245-259.
14. Elkington, J. (1998). "Cannibals with forks: the triple-bottom-line of 21st century," New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC.
15. EU, The European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52002AG0019&qid=1623671597896 accessed 13 June 2021.

16. EU, The European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32006R1907&qid=1623672191606 accessed 13 June 2021.

17. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Pasurka, J. C. A. (2001). “Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth”, Journal of Regional Science, 41(3), 381-409.
18. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Tyteca, D. (1996). “An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities”, Ecological Economics, 18, 161-175.
19. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Hernandez-Sancho, F. (2004). “Environmental performance: An index number approach”, Resource and Energy Economics, 26(4), 343-352.
20. Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
21. Frota, J. Q., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., van Nunen, J., and van Heck, E. (2008). “Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks”, International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 195-208.
22. Gan, G. Y., Lee, H. S., Tao, Y. J., and Tu, C. S. (2021). “Selecting Suitable, Green Port Crane Equipment for International Commercial Ports”, Sustainability, 13(12), 6801.
23. Gavronski, I., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., and Nascimento, L. F. M. d. (2011). “A resource-based view of green supply management”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 872-885.
24. Gonzalez, E., Sakis, J., Huisingh, D., Huatuco, L. H., Maculan, N., Montoya-Torres a J. R., and de Almeida, C. (2015). “Making real progress toward more sustainable societies using decision support models and tools: introduction to the special volume”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 1-13.
25. Hesterberg, T. W., Anderson, R., Bernstein, D. M., Bunn, W. B., Chase, G. A., Jankousky, A. L., Marsh G. M., and McClellan, R. O. (2012). “Product stewardship and science: safe manufacture and use of fiber glass”, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 62(2), 257-277.
26. Kainuma, Y., and Tawara, N. (2006). “A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management”, International Journal of Production Economics, 101(1), 99-108.
27. Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., and Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). “Sustainable operations management”, Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482-492.
28. Klopp, G. (1985). “The analysis of the efficiency of production system with multiple inputs and outputs”, Ph. D. Dissertation Thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago.
29. Kumar, G., Meena, P., and Difrancesco, R. M. (2021). “How do collaborative culture and capability improve sustainability?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125824.
30. Leu, J.-D., Tsai, W.-H., Fan, M.-N., and Chuang, S. (2020). “Benchmarking sustainable manufacturing: a dea-based method and application”, Energies, 13, 5962.
31. Malesios, C., Dey, P. K., and Ben Abdelaziz, F. (2020). “Supply chain sustainability performance measurement of small and medium sized enterprises using structural equation modeling”, Annals of Operations Research, 294 (1-2), 623-653.
32. Mattia, G., Di Leo, A., and Pratesi, C. A. (2021) “Recognizing the key drivers and industry implications of sustainable packaging design: a mixed-method approach”, Sustainability, 13 (9), 5299.
33. Moktadir, M. A., Dwivedi, A., Khan, N. S., Paul, S.K., and Khan, S. A. (2021). “Analysis of risk factors in sustainable supply chain management in an emerging economy of leather industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 124641.
34. Ramezankhani, M. J., Torabi, S. A., and Vahidi, F. (2018). “Supply chain performance measurement and evaluation: A mixed sustainability and resilience approach”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 531-548.
35. Sarkis, J. (1995). “Manufacturing strategy and environmental consciousness”, Technovation, 15(2), 79-97.
36. Sarkis, J. (2003). “A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 397-409.
37. Sarkis, J., and Dijkshoorn, J. (2007). “Relationships between solid waste management performance and environmental practice adoption in welsh small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)”, International Journal of Production Research, 45(21), 4989-5015.
38. Schoenherr, T., and Talluri, S. (2013). “Environmental sustainability initiatives: a comparative analysis of plant efficiencies in Europe and the U.S. engineering management”, IEEE Transactions, 60(2), 353-365.
39. Seuring, S. (2013). “A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management”, Decision Support Systems, 54(4), 1513-1520.
40. Seuring, S., and Müller, M. (2008). “From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
41. Shah, R., and Ward, P. T. (2007). “Defining and developing measures of lean production”, Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 785-805.
42. Shiue, Y.-C., and Lin, C.-Y. (2012). “Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry”, Energy and Buildings, 54(0), 266-277.
43. Srivastava, S. K. (2007). “Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review” , International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
44. Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M. (2011). “Methodological comparison betweeen two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment”, European Journal of Operational Research, 210(3), 684-693.
45. Sundarakani, B., de Souza, R., Goh, M., Wagner, S. M., and Manikandan, S. (2010). “Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain”, International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 43-50.
46. Tone, K. (2001). “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509.
47. Tsai, C. M., Lee, H. S., and Gan, G. Y. (2021). “A new fuzzy dea model for solving the mcdm problems in supplier selection”, Journal of Marine Science and Technology-Taiwan, 29(1), 89-95.
48. Song, K. H., Choi, S., and Han, I. H. (2020). “Competitiveness evaluation methodology for aviation industry sustainability using network dea”, Sustainability, 12(24), 10303.
49. United Nations. (1992). Earth Summit of United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Brazil, https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/rio1992.

50. Wang, J. B., Gao, X., and Wang, Z. G. (2021). “Sustainable supply chain decisions under e-commerce platform marketplace with competition”, Sustainability, 13(8), 4162.
51. WCED. (1987). Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.

52. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal (pre-1986), 5(2), 171-180.
53. Wu, Z., and Pagell, M. (2011). “Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management”, Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 577-590.
54. Yan, J., Zhao, T., Lin, T., and Li, Y. (2017). ”Investigating multi-regional cross-industrial linkage based on sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: a case of construction industry in China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2911-2924.
55. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., and Poh, K. L. (2006). “Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance”, Ecological Economics, 60(1), 111-118.
56. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., and Poh, K. L. (2008b). “A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies”, European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 1-18.
57. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., and Lai, K. H. (2008). “Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation”, International Journal of Production Economics, 111 (2), 261-273.

指導教授

呂俊德(Jun-Der Leu)

審核日期

2021-7-20

推文