公司治理與企業價值關聯性研究-以社會參與為調節效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：13

、訪客IP：3.128.189.104

姓名

蕭信隆(Xin-Long Xiao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

公司治理與企業價值關聯性研究-以社會參與為調節效果

相關論文

★ 碳排放對企業財務績效的影響 : 以高階經理人現金紅利為調節變數

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究探討公司治理、社會參與和企業價值三者之關聯性，社會參與為企業社會責任活動主要項目之一，內容包含慈善公益、弱勢教育與藝文推廣等等與社會大眾間相關的活動。本研究分別以通信網路業與金融保險業為樣本來源，先探討公司治理與企業價值之關聯性，再以社會參與比例做為調節變數了解是否能正向增強公司治理與企業價值之關係。
本研究發現通信網路業樣本中，公司治理評鑑、外資持股比例與獨立董事比例皆正向影響企業價值，董監持股比例則負向影響企業價值。進一步探討與社會參與關係後，發現社會參與和公司治理評鑑有交互關係並正向增強Tobin’s Q，也與獨立董事比例有交互關係並正向增強Tobin’s Q與股價淨值比。
在金融保險業樣本中，公司治理評鑑、外資持股比例、董監持股比例與獨立董事比例皆正向影響企業價值。進一步探討與社會參與關係後，發現與公司治理評鑑有交互關係並正向增強EPS與股價淨值比，也與外資持股比例有交互關係並正向增強EPS、Tobin’s Q與股價淨值比，不過與董監持股比例有交互關係但負向增強EPS與股價淨值比，也與獨立董事比例有交互關係但負向增強EPS、Tobin’s Q與股價淨值比。
期望透過本研究讓讀者知悉社會參與、公司治理與企業價值三變數之關聯性，也能認同社會參與相關議題在企業社會責任內的重要性，同時鼓勵企業未來在社會參與活動能多加規劃，成為與社會共存共榮之企業。

摘要(英)

This study explores the relationship between corporate governance, social engagement and corporate value. Social engagement is one of the main projects of corporate social responsibility activities such as charity event, education for underprivileged groups and cultural activities promotion. This sample of research is from the communication network industry and the financial and insurance industry. We first explore the relationship between corporate governance and corporate value, and then discuss the potential moderating role of social engagement between the relationship between corporate governance and corporate value.
In the communications network industry samples, corporate governance evaluation, foreign shareholding ratio, and independent director ratio all have a positive relationship with corporate value, while the directors and supervisors shareholding ratio has a negative relationship with corporate value. Furthermore, social engagement can positively enhance the relationship between corporate governance evaluation and Tobin’s Q, and the relationship between independent director ratio and Tobin’s Q as well as price-to-book ratio.
In the financial industry samples, all corporate governance variables positively correlated with corporate value. Social engagement positively enhance the relationship between corporate governance evaluation and EPS as well as price-to-book ratio, and the relationship between foreign shareholding ratio and three firm value variables. But social engagement weaken the relationship between directors and supervisors shareholding ratio and EPS as well as price-to-book ratio, and the relationship between independent director ratio and three firm value variables.
Through this research, readers will recognize the importance of social engagement in corporate social responsibility, and encourage companies to focus more on social engagement in the future and then prosper with society.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 社會參與
★ 公司治理
★ 企業價值

關鍵字(英)

★ CSR
★ Social Engagement
★ Corporate Governance
★ Firm Value

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節研究動機與目的 2

第二章文獻探討與假說發展 6
第一節公司治理與企業價值 6
第二節企業社會參與和企業價值 10

第三章研究方法 13
第一節樣本選取與資料來源 13
第二節變數衡量與定義 14
第三節實證模型 19

第四章實證結果 24
第一節敘述性統計 24
第二節相關性分析 27
第三節迴歸分析 30

第五章研究結論與限制 43
第一節研究結論 43
第二節研究限制 46

參考文獻 47

參考文獻

一、中文文獻
1. 池祥萱、繆文娟、莊瀅臻（2013），企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎？來自全球500大公司的證據，管理學報，第31卷第1期，1-19。
2. 邱國書（2020），台灣金控業從事「社會參與」和其經營績效的關聯性-以F金控公司為例，中興大學應用經濟學系所學位論文。
3. 林俊傑、劉梧柏、黃華瑋（2018），公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討：以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例，商略學報，第10卷第1期，23-46。
4. 俞海琴、周本鄂（1994），臺灣地區上市公司董監事、關係人持股比率和公司托賓Q關係之研究，管理評論，第13卷第1期，79-98。
5. 高蘭芬、盧正壽、黃冠智、陳安琳（2012），公司治理、公司績效與投資策略，中山管理評論，第20卷第3期，851-880。
6. 陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬、李文智（2004），應用Ohlson 會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性—以台灣上市公司電子業為例，臺大管理論叢，第15卷第2期，123-141。
7. 陳雅琦（2016），企業社會責任與股價行為關係之研究，逢甲大學財務金融學系學位論文。
8. 黃馨嬅（2010），公司治理品質、經營策略對經營績效之影響-以通過中華公司治理協會公司治理評鑑之上市櫃公司為例，臺北大學企業管理學系學位論文。
9. 楊佑菖（2014），董監事持股對績效指標價值攸關性之影響，中原大學會計研究所學位論文。
10. 劉美纓、丁碧惠、朱奐聿（2014），企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究，科際整合管理研討會，17-30。
11. 蔡秉庭、王茂昌（2019），CSR與企業價值相互關連性：無形資產影響，會計與公司治理，第14卷第2期，63-82。
12. 賴昭銘（2019），臺灣電子製造廠商的企業社會責任與社會參與，臺灣師範大學東亞學系學位論文。

二、英文文獻
1. Awan, A.G., and S. Saeed. (2015). Impact of CSR on Firms’ Financial Performance: A Case Study of Ghee and Fertilizer Industry in Southern Punjab-Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(7), 365-374.
2. Baek, J. S., J. K. Kang, and K. S. Park. (2004). Corporate governance and firm value: evidence from the Korean financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2), 265-313.
3. Beck, C., G. Frost, and S. Jones. (2018). CSR disclosure and financial performance revisited: A cross-country analysis. Australian Journal of Management, 43(4), 517-537.
4. Bena, J., M. Ferreira, P. Matos, and P. Pires. (2017). Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership. Journal of Financial Economics, 126(1), 122-146.
5. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
6. Dahya, J., O. Dimitrov, and J. J. McConnell. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73-100
7. Fauver, L., M. Hung, X. Li, and A. G. Taboada. (2017). Board reforms and firm value: Worldwide evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 125(1), 120-142.
8. Ferreira, M. A., and P. Matos. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 499-533.
9. Flammer, C. (2015). Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1469-1485.
10. Gao, Y. (2011). CSR in an emerging country: a content analysis of CSR reports of listed companies. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(2), 263-291.
11. Gomes, M. (2019). Does CSR influence M&A target choices?. Finance Research Letters, 30, 153-159.
12. Huang, C. J., W. C. Ke, and C. P. Lin. (2020). Does CSR Materiality Affect Financial Performance in Taiwan?. Journal of Financial Study, 28(4), 59-109.
13. Huang, W., and T. Zhu. (2015). Foreign institutional investors and corporate governance in emerging markets: Evidence of a split-share structure reform in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 312-326.
14. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
15. Kusnadi, Y. (2011). Do corporate governance mechanisms matter for cash holdings and firm value? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(5), 554-570.
16. Liao, P. C., N. N. Xia, C. L. Wu, X. L. Zhang, and J. L. Yeh. (2017). Communicating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of international contractors: Content analysis of CSR reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 327-336.
17. Lin, C. S., R. Y. Chang., and V. T. Dang. (2015). An Integrated Model to Explain How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Corporate Financial Performance. Sustainability, 7(7), 8292-8311.
18. Liu, Y., M. K. Miletkov, Z. Wei, and T. Yang. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 223-244.
19. Mashayekhi, B., and M. S. Bazaz. (2008). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Iran. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 4(2), 156-172.
20. Oh, W. Y., Y. K. Chang, and A. Martynov. (2011). The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 283-297.
21. Oware, K. M., and T. Mallikarjunappa. (2021). Financial Performance and Gender Diversity: The Moderating and Mediating Effect of CSR Disclosure and Expenditure of Listed Firms in India. The Journal of Business Perspective.
22. Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 126(1), 122-146.
23. Raza, A., M. I. Ilyas, R. Rauf, and R. Qamar. (2012). Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Financial Performance (CFP): literature review approach. Elixir Finance Management, 46(2012), 8404-8409.
24. Rosenstein, S., and J. G. Wyatt. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175-191.
25. Schnietz, K. E., and M. J. Epstein. (2005). Exploring the Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 327-345.
26. Siegel, D. S., and D. F. Vitaliano. (2007). An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy , 16(3), 773-792.
27. Surroca, J., J. A. Tribó, and S. Waddock. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490.
28. Walsh, G., and S. Beatty. (2007). Customer-Based Corporate Reputation of a Service Firm: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 127-143.
29. Yu, Lei., D. Wang, and Q. Wang. (2018). The Effect of Independent Director Reputation Incentives on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(9), 3302.

指導教授

蔡文賢黃依潔(Wen-Hsien Tsai Yi-Chieh Huang)

審核日期

2021-8-17

推文