博碩士論文 108421055 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:29 、訪客IP:13.59.62.219
姓名 徐昊安(Hao-An Hsu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 轉換型領導與交易型領導對顧客價值共創之影響-跨層次的中介因子與調節因子之分析
相關論文
★ 工作滿足、領導行為、工作特性與人格特質對離職傾向之探討-以超大型會計師事務所審計人員為例★ 以組織診斷模型診斷企業組織層級架構-以某公司為例
★ 科技產業組織診斷與分析之研究-以Q公司為例★ 製造業推行六標準差的成功關鍵因素探討
★ 高職辦理輪調式建教班對學校經營績效之評估-以北區私立高職為例★ 本國商業銀行經營績效之探討-資料包絡分析法之應用
★ 台灣中小企業 創業動機與創業績效關係之研究★ 員工當責與真誠領導之關聯性-以心理賦權與團隊凝聚力為中介變數
★ 以個人與環境適配為關鍵中介探討特定品牌領導對員工品牌權益之影響★ 道德感讓你買更多綠色產品?從消費者產品知覺價格及品質角度來探討—以綠色程度做調節
★ 線上品牌社群該如何提升與粉絲的價值共創?以線上品牌社群活動與線下實體活動為中介變數探討★ 農業創新服務模式之商業模式研究-以蜂巢數據科技有限公司為例
★ 燈⽕闌珊處的求職旅程:如何透 過⼯作價值觀、雇主吸引⼒、激 勵因⼦為求職者點亮路徑★ 購買意願的幕後功臣:Instagram大小網紅的 自我揭露對消費者自我一致性與感知真實的影響
★ 中小企業之組織診斷與分析-以A公司為例★ 高科技產業人力資源發展與組織績效之研究-以新竹科學園區為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 本研究試圖回答:「轉換型領導者與交易型領導者如何透過直接效果、調節效果與中介效果,影響顧客價值共創行為產生? 」,本研究分成三部分:第一部份探討領導風格(轉換型、交易型)如何影響顧客價值共創;第二部份探討組織氣候(衝突、人情)在領導風格與顧客價值共創是否有中介效果;第三部份探討LMX與權威作為調節變數,如何影響組織氣候(衝突、人情)與顧客價值共創。本研究採階層線性模型進行跨層次分析,以台灣不同產業別的在職工作者作為研究對象,問卷共發放180份,有效問卷共180份,有效問卷回收率為100%。
本研究結果顯示,第一部份結果為轉換型領導者對顧客價值共創有顯著影響,交易型領導者則無影響,第二部分中介效果,本研究顯示組織氣候-衝突與組織氣候-人情在領導風格與顧客價值共創間皆無中介效果產生,然而關於第三部分,本研究結果顯示LMX在交易型領導與和組織氣候-衝突、組織氣候-人情與顧客價值共創間皆具有負向調節效果,相反的LMX則對轉換型領導者和組織氣候-衝突、組織氣候-人情與顧客價值共創間不具調節效果,此外,本研究發現權威在轉換型領導至顧客價值共創間具有負向調節效果,而在交易型領導與組織氣候-衝突間具有正向調節效果。
本研究貢獻分為三個部分,首先,本研究選擇探討領導風格與顧客價值共創間的直接關係,擴展了轉換型領導與交易型領導對於顧客價值共創行為的實證研究,也實證了直接效果的理論缺口,第二,填補了以組織氣候作為中介效果的缺口,並且將組織氣候作為組織層面到顧客層面的中介因子,實證了特定的組織氣候構面(衝突、人情)在轉換型領導與交易型領導至顧客價值共創之間之中介效果,最後,以LMX與權威作為調節變數實證了關係與權力對於此兩種領導風格到特定組織氣候(衝突、人情),以及到顧客價值共創的影響,也延伸了過往以LMX或權威作為調節因子的研究。
摘要(英) This study attempts to investigate how transformational leadership or transactional leadership stimulates customer value co-creation behavior via direct effect, mediators and moderators. The study is divided into three parts. First of all, this study explores the direct effect of leadership style (transformational & transactional) on customer value co-creation behavior. Second, we examine the mediating effect of organizational climate (conflict & warmth) in the relationship between leadership style and customer value co-creation. Finally, this study investigates the moderating effect of LMX & authority in the relationship between leadership style to organizational climate (conflict & warmth) and customer value co-creation. The present study employs hierarchical liner modeling to assess the hypotheses. In total, 180 surveys were distributed, and a total of 180 valid samples were retrieved from different industries in Taiwan (a valid response rate of 100%).
According to the retrieved result, transformational leadership has positive effect on customer value co-creation, transactional leadership has no effect. Second, there is no mediating effect of organizational climate (conflict & warmth) in the relationship between leadership style and customer value co-creation. Third, there are negative moderating effect of LMX in the relationship between transactional leadership to organizational climate (conflict & warmth) and customer value co-creation. Conversely, there is no moderating effect of LMX in the relationship between transformational leadership to organizational climate (conflict & warmth) and customer value co-creation. Furthermore, we examine the negative moderating effect of authority in the relationship between transformational leadership and customer value co-creation, and we also examine the positive moderating effect of authority in the relationship between transactional leadership and organizational climate(conflict).
This study contributes to research in three aspects. First, we explored the direct relationship between leadership style and customer value co-creation, expanded the empirical study of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on customer value co-creation behavior, also bridged the theoretical gap of direct effect. Second, this study bridged the gap of organizational climate as a mediator, and used the organizational climate as a mediator from organizational level to the customer level effect, demonstrated the mediating effect of specific organizational climate aspects (conflict & warmth) between transformational leadership and transactional leadership to customer value co-creation. Finally, we choosed LMX and authority as moderators to demonstrate the influence of relationship and power on these two leadership styles to the specific organizational climate (conflict & warmth), and to the customer value co-creation, extended previous studies using LMX or authority as a moderator.
關鍵字(中) ★ 轉換型領導
★ 交易型領導
★ 組織氣候
★ 組織氛圍
★ 衝突
★ 人情
★ 領導成員交換理論(LMX)
★ 權威
★ 階層線性模型
關鍵字(英) ★ Transformational Leadership
★ Transactional Leadership
★ Organizational Climate
★ Group Climate
★ Conflict
★ Warmth
★ Leader-Member Exchange(LMX)
★ Leader-Member Exchange(LMX)
★ Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM)
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract iii
致謝 v
圖目錄 x
表目錄 xi
一、緒論 1
1-1研究背景與目的 1
1-2研究價值與預期貢獻 5
二、文獻探討與研究假設 7
2-1價值 7
2-2 顧客價值共創 7
2-3 轉換型領導 9
2-4 交易型領導 12
2-5 組織氣候 15
2-5-1衝突(Conflict)構面 16
2-5-2人情(Warmth)構面 18
2-6 Fiedler權變模型 20
2-7 領導成員交換理論(LMX) 22
2-8 權威 26
2-8-1 轉換型領導與權威的關係 26
2-8-2 交易型領導與權威的關係 27
三、研究方法 30
3-1研究對象與樣本發放 30
3-2問卷設計 31
3-3變項衡量方式 31
3-3-1轉換型領導 31
3-3-2交易型領導 32
3-3-3權威 33
3-3-4 領導成員交換理論 34
3-3-5 組織氣候-衝突 35
3-3-6 組織氣候-人情 36
3-3-7 顧客價值共創 36
3-4 控制變數 38
3-5 資料分析方法 39
3-5-1敘述性統計與相關分析 39
3-5-2 因素分析 39
3-5-3信度分析 39
3-5-4效度分析 40
3-5-5共同方法變異控制 40
3-5-6階層線性模型分析 41
四、資料分析 42
4-1 敘述性統計分析 42
4-2相關分析 44
4-3 信度分析 44
4-4建構效度分析 47
4-4-1收斂效度 47
4-4-2 區別效度 49
4-5 變數之組內與組間變異成份分析 50
4-6 共同方法變異分析 51
4-7 研究假設分析結果 52
4-7-1 「顧客價值共創」之虛無模型 52
4-7-2 「轉換型領導」對「顧客價值共創」的關係 53
4-7-3 「交易型領導」對「顧客價值共創」的關係 53
4-7-4 「轉換型領導」對「組織氣候-衝突」的關係 54
4-7-5 「交易型領導」對「組織氣候-衝突」的關係 54
4-7-6 「組織氣候-衝突」對「顧客價值共創」的關係 54
4-7-7 「組織氣候-衝突」對「轉換型領導」至「顧客價值共創」之中介效果 55
4-7-8 「組織氣候-衝突」對「交易型領導」至「顧客價值共創」之中介效果 56
4-7-9 「轉換型領導」對「組織氣候-人情」的關係 57
4-7-10 「交易型領導」對「組織氣候-人情」的關係 57
4-7-11 「組織氣候-人情」對「顧客價值共創」的關係 58
4-7-12 「組織氣候-人情」對「轉換型領導」至「顧客價值共創」之中介效果 58
4-7-13 「組織氣候-人情」對「交易型領導」至「顧客價值共創」之中介效果 59
4-7-14 「LMX」對「轉換型領導」至「顧客價值共創」的調節效果 60
4-7-15 「LMX」對「交易型領導」至「顧客價值共創」的調節效果 61
4-7-16 「LMX」對「轉換型領導」至「組織氣候-衝突」的調節效果 62
4-7-17 「LMX」對「交易型領導」至「組織氣候-衝突」的調節效果 63
4-7-18 「LMX」對「轉換型領導」至「組織氣候-人情」的調節效果 64
4-7-19 「LMX」對「交易型領導」至「組織氣候-人情」的調節效果 64
4-7-20 「權威」對「轉換型領導」至「顧客價值共創」的調節效果 65
4-7-21「權威」對「轉換型領導」至「組織氣候-衝突」的調節效果 66
4-7-22 「權威」對「轉換型領導」至「組織氣候-人情」的調節效果 67
4-7-23 「權威」對「交易型領導」至「顧客價值共創」的調節效果 67
4-7-24 「權威」對「交易型領導」至「組織氣候-衝突」的調節效果 68
4-7-25 「權威」對「交易型領導」至「組織氣候-人情」的調節效果 69
五、結論與建議 76
5-1 研究貢獻 77
5-1-1 領導風格(轉換型、交易型)如何影響顧客價值共創 77
5-1-2 組織氣候(衝突、人情)在領導風格與顧客價值共創之中介效果 79
5-1-3 領導成員交換理論之調節效果 81
5-1-4 權威之調節效果 82
5-1-5 研究結果之理論意涵層面 84
5-2  實務建議 89
5-3  研究限制與後續研究建議 90

參考文獻……………………………………………………………………..……………....92
附錄一 受測問卷……………………………………………………………………..…......98
參考文獻 一、中文部分
吳欣蓓、陸洛、顧家祈、張妤玥(2010)。轉換型領導行為、部屬工作壓力及主管滿意度的關聯-人格特質為調節變項。中華管理學報 11(2): 1-30 。
二、英文部分
Anders, G., Per, K., & Lars, W. (2012). Customer co-creation in service innovation: a matter of communication? Journal of service management, 23(3): 311-327.
Bhaskar, P. P. J. (2016). CEO transformational and transactional leadership and organizational innovation: the moderating role of environmental dynamism. Management decision, 54(7): 1542-1568.
Bruce, J. A., Weichun, Z., William, K., & Puja, B. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of organizational behavior, 25: 951-968.
Chi N. W., & Pan, S. Y. (2012). A multilevel investigation of missing links between transformational leadership and task performance: The mediating roles of perceived person-job fit and person-organization fit. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27: 43-56.
Christian, E., Andreas, W., Gerhard, B., Katharina, O. B., Parker, E., Ceasar, D., & Gerald R. F. (2013). Further specification of the leader political skill–leadership effectiveness relationships: Transformational and transactional leader behavior as mediators. The leadership quarterly, 24: 516–533.
Christopher, C. R., Kenneth, J. H., & K. Michele Kacmar (2011). LMX, Context perceptions, and performance: An uncertainty management perspective. Journal of management, 37(3): 819-838.
Daniel, M. (2011). Supportive supervisor communication as an intervening influence in the relationship between LMX and employee job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. Journal of behavioral studies in business, 4: 1-28.
Diego B., Robin D., Marissa O., & Charles P. (2017). The influence of restaurant co-workers’ perceived warmth and competence on employees’ turnover intentions: The mediating role of job attitudes. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60: 13-22.
Dimitrios, B., & Athanasios, K. (2014). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction in the banking sector: A review. International review of management and marketing, 4(3): 187-200.
Dirk, D., & Daan, S. (2015). Leveraging transformational and transactional leadership to cultivate the generation of organization-focused ideas. The leadership quarterly, 26: 204-219.
Duleeep, D., Lisa, L. B. C., & Nawar, C. (2018). Customer value co-creation behavior: A dyadic exploration of the influence of salesperson emotional intelligence on customer participation and citizenship behavior. Journal of business research, 92: 9-24.
Emerson, W. M., Helena A., & Ma´rio R. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management decision, 50(10): 1861-1879.
Fred E. Fiedler. (1978). The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process. Advance in experimental social psychology, 11: 59-112.
Henry, R. Y., David, R. G., Dana, L. J., & Mallory, A. M. (2020). A meta-analysis of transactional leadership and follower performance: Double-edged effects of LMX and empowerment. Journal of management, 47(5): 125-128.
Ieva, M., & Claudia, A. S. (2013). When creativity enhances sales effectiveness: The moderating role of leader–member exchange. Journal of organizational behavior, 34: 974-994.
Isabel, C. B., & Linn, V. D. (2009). Employee voice behavior: interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management communication quarterly, 23(1): 84-104.
James, H. D., William, H. B., Robert, C. L., Robyn, L. B., & Gerald, R. F. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of management, 38(6): 1715-1759.
Joseph B. H. (2012). Leadership behavior and organizational climate: An empirical study in a non-profit organization. Emerging leadership journeys, 5(1): 9-35.
Kimberley, B., Arnold, B. B., Evangelia, D., & Machteld (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of managerial psychology, 30(7): 754-770.
Koo & Li (2015). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2): 155-163.
Lale, G., & Arzu, I.,(2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of business research, 62: 461-473.
Lim, J. Y., Moon, K. K. (2020). Transformational leadership and employees’ helping behavior in public organizations: Does organizational structure matter? Public personnel management, 1-24.
Linjuan, R. M. (2014). Why leadership matters to internal communication: linking transformational leadership, symmetrical communication, and employee outcomes. Journal of public relations research, 26: 256-279.
Mark, A. F., & Eddie, O. (2012). Organizational identification and leader member exchange influences on customer orientation and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of strategic marketing, 20(4): 365-377.
Melvyn, R. W. H., Nico, W. V. Y., Barbara, W., & Kai, S. (2014). Transformational and Transactional leadership and followers’ achievement goals. J Bus Psychol, 29: 413-425.
Muhammad, A., Amjad, S., Zulkipli, G., & Imran, K. (2021). Employee motivation to co-create value (EMCCV): Construction and validation of scale. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 58 , 102334.
Naser A., & Shebiab A. (2014). Organizational conflict: A survey study on the public institution for social insurance. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(2): 262-275.
Nathan, P. P., Philip, M. P., & Valentina, V. K. (2010). Dispelling misconceptions and providing guidelines for leader reward and punishment behavior. Business horizons, 53: 291-303.
Neha, V., Aruna B. B., S. Rangnekar & M.K. Barua. (2012). Association between leadership style and decision making style in Indian organizations. Journal of management development, 34(3): 246-269.
Ngadiman, Anis, E., & Dwi, R. (2013). Influence of transformational leadership and organization climate to the work satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior on the educational personnel of Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta. Educational research international, 1(1): 41-66.
Odumeru, J. A. & Ifeanyi, G. O. (2013). Transformational vs. Transactional theories: evidence in literature. International review of management and business research, 2(2): 355-361.
Olga, O. A. K. (2016). The influence of customer engagement in value co-creation on customer satisfaction: searching for new forms of co-creation in the Russian hotel industry. Worldwide hospitality and tourism themes, 8(3): 327-345.
Omid M. (2015). Interaction between communication and organizational conflict and its relationship with performance. International journal of business and administrative studies, 1(2): 54-60.
Pascale M. Le Blanc, & Vicente G. R. (2012). A team level investigation of the relationship between Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) differentiation, and commitment and performance. The leadership quarterly, 23: 534-544.
Paul M. M. (1976). An assessment of the Litwin and stringer organization climate questionnaire: An empirical and theoretical extension of the Sims and Lafollette study. Personnel psychology, 29: 371-392.
Peng, W., & Joseph, C. R. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human relations, 63: 1105.
Ra’ed, M., Bader, Y. O., & Ali, T. (2016). A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job performance, and firm performance: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of management development, 35(5): 681-705.
Rex E. M. (2010). The influence of organizational culture and conflict on market orientation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(7): 514 – 524.
Rick, D. H., A. C. Wang, Z. Chen, B. S. Cheng, & J. L. Farh (2018). Transformational leadership and organisational citizenship behaviour: a moderated mediation model of leader-member-exchange and subordinates’ gender. Applied psychology: An international review, 67(4): 617–644.
Robin, M., Yves, G., Geoff, T., Allan, L., & Olga, E. (2015). Leader-member exchange (lmx) and performance: a meta-analytic review. Personnel psychology, 69(1): 67-121.
Roya, A., Martin, M. C., & Fred, F. (1995). The contingency model of leadership effectiveness: its levels of analysis. Leadership quarterly, 6(2): 147-167.
Samuel, A., Fred, O. W., Qin, Z., & Chad, A. H. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: test of mediation and moderation processes. Human performance, 25: 1-25.
Shahrina, M. N., Subarna, S., Ena, B., Hezlina, H., Wan, F. W. A., & Azrai, A. (2014). Organizational communication climate and conflict management: communications management in an oil and gas company. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, 109: 1046-1058.
Shweta, J., & Srirang, J. (2013). Leader-member exchange: a critique of theory & practice. Journal of management & public policy, 4(2): 42-53.
Solomon, O. I. (2012). Examining the relationships between organizational communication and conflict management, and the leader-member exchange (LMX) Theory. ProQuest LLC, UMI Number: 3509191.
Stephen P. R., Mary, C., Joseph, J. M., & Lori, K. L. (2020). Management 14e, Pearson.
Sundi, K. (2013). Effect of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on employee performance of Konawe education department at southeast Sulawesi province. International journal of business and management invention, 2(12): 50-58.
Tayla, N. B., & Stephen, G. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test. Academy of management journal, 39(6): 1538-1567.
W. J. Lin, C. Y. Lin, & Y. H. Chang (2016). The impact of coaching orientation on subordinate performance: the moderating effects of implicit person theory and LMX. Asia pacific journal of human resources, 55(1): 86-105.
Xifang, M.,& Wan, J. (2018). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and employee creativity in entrepreneurial firms. The journal of applied behavioral science, 54(3): 302-324.
Y. H. Lee, C. Hsiao, & Y. H. Li (2014). The role of social capital and knowledge sharing in transformational leadership promoting value co-creation –a cross-level analysis. IEEE 18th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design, 330–335.
Yafang, T. (2011). Relationship between Organizational Culture, Leadership Behavior and Job Satisfaction. Tsai BMC health services research, 11: 98.
Youjae, Y., & Taeshik, G. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of business research, 66: 1279-1284.
指導教授 李憶萱(Yi-Hsuan Lee) 審核日期 2021-9-2
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明