運用精實六標準差改善高等教育機構工作流程之個案研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：10

、訪客IP：18.225.56.194

姓名

蔡喬安(Chiao-An Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

運用精實六標準差改善高等教育機構工作流程之個案研究
(A case study on Lean Six Sigma improvement project in the process of a higher education institution)

相關論文

★ 應用灰色理論於有機農產品之經營管理— 需求預測及關鍵成功因素探討	★ NAND型Flash價格與交運量預測在風險分析下之決策模式
★ 工業電腦用無鉛晶片組最適存貨政策之研究-以A公司為例	★ 砷化鎵代工廠磊晶之最適存貨管理-以W公司為例
★ 資訊分享&決策制定下產銷協同關係之研究 -以IC設計業為例	★ 應用分析層級法於電子化學品業委外供應商評選準則之研究
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車售服零件庫存滯銷因素分析-以C公司為例	★ 多目標規劃最佳六標準差水準: 以薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器C公司製造流程為例
★ 以資料探勘技術進行消費者返廠定期保養之實證研究	★ 以價值鏈觀點探討品牌公司關鍵組織流程之取決-以S公司為例
★ 應用產銷協同規劃之流程改善於化纖產業-現況改善與效益分析	★ 權力模式與合作關係對於報價策略之影響研究—以半導體產業A公司為例
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車製造業之庫存原因分析	★ 以類神經網路預測代工費報價---以中小面板產業C公司為例
★ 電路板產業存貨改善研究-以N公司為例	★ 運用六標準差改善機台備用零件(Spare parts)存貨管理

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-6-6以後開放)

摘要(中)

本論文旨在呈現台灣高等教育機構之品質管理系統流程改善個案研究內容。研究之學院自2015年正式取得國際商管學院促進協會(AACSB)認證以後，便持續維護認證及其系統運行。因應科技進步、國際化導致學院策略轉變之下，可觀察到系統之日常運行出現浪費：不合適的流程需要更新，新工具也能用以提升效率，故本研究以精實六標準差(Lean Six Sigma, LSS)方法論來處理這些浪費。
精實六標準差是製造業中廣泛應用的改善手法，已有許多研究證實可運用此手法提升生產率以及建立完善流程，乃至減低內部衝突；然至1990年代，精實六標準差之應用才滲透至高等教育產業。本研究期望透過院長、認證辦公室執行長以及院內職員等利害關係人回覆之數據，用以識別、改善現行品質系統中的浪費。本研究根據ECRS(eliminate-combine-rearrange-simplify)原則之概念設計問卷，邀請認證辦公室評估流程的宗旨符合度、必要性以及耗時程度，並針對高耗時流程，以DMAIC (define-measure-analyze-improve-control)架構進行改善，利用軟體及不同媒介提升現有流程效率並降低時間與紙張浪費。
本研究為台灣首例嘗試將精實六標準差運用於高等教育行政流程改善之個案研究，欲取得第三方認證之學院，亦可參考本研究來部署其品質系統。因本研究為試行計畫，要涵蓋整體品質管理系統實屬困難，因此僅針對部分流程推動改善，建議未來可運用精實六標準差架構及工具，針對其餘部分進行持續改善，引導整體成為精實品質管理系統。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this paper is to present the case study of the quality management system (QMS) improvement project of Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) in Taiwan. The HEI under research had earned its accreditation from Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) from 2015 and kept maintaining and operating the management system ever since. With technology development and globalization which leads to changes in strategic plan of SoM, some wastes were observed through daily operation: inappropriate processes demanded update and new tools can be used for increasing efficiency. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology was therefore applied to address these wastes in this research.
LSS had been widely used as an improvement approach in manufacturing industry, and proved to be effective for raising productivity, establishing the procedure and decreasing the conflicts of departments, but it was introduced to HEIs until l990s. This study is expected to utilize the data from stakeholders such as Dean, Director of the Accreditation Office, and the staff within SoM to distinguish the waste in the current QMS and improve it. A survey designed following the ECRS (eliminate-combine-rearrange-simplify) principle was used to evaluate the level in aspects of mission alignment, necessity and time-consuming. The research focused on time-consuming processes for improvement under the DMAIC (define-measure-analyze-improve-control) framework to reduce the waste of time and resource.
This research is the first work in Taiwan attempts to improve QMS of a HEI with LSS methodology, schools tend to earn a third-party accreditation can refer to this study for QMS deployment. The implementation of DMAIC pushes the continuous improvement and prepares SoM for the future LSS projects. As the research is a pilot project, it is hard to cover the entire QMS and only part of the system was included in scope. The framework and tools are recommended to put into practice in the future to bring up other projects for continuous improvement of the rest parts, and lead it to be a lean quality management system.

關鍵字(中)

★ 精實六標準差
★ AACSB認證
★ DMAIC
★ ECRS原則
★ 高等教育機構
★ 個案研究

關鍵字(英)

★ Lean Six Sigma (LSS)
★ AACSB Accreditation
★ DMAIC
★ ECRS Principle
★ higher education institutions (HEIs)
★ Case studies

論文目次

Table of Contents
中　　文　　摘　　要......................................i
Abstract................................................ii
Table of Contents.......................................iii
List of Figures.........................................v
List of Tables..........................................vi
Chapter 1. Introduction..............................1
1-1 Research background.................................1
1-2 Research Motivation.................................2
1-3 Research Purpose....................................3
1-4 Research Structure..................................5
Chapter 2. Literature Review.........................7
2-1 Lean Six Sigma concept and tools....................7
2-2 Lean Six Sigma application..........................14
2-3 Lean Six Sigma Case Studies.........................20
Chapter 3. Methodology...............................23
3-1 Implementation procedure............................23
3-2 Research Methods....................................24
Chapter 4. Case Study................................28
4-1 The School..........................................28
4-2 Current QMS.........................................33
4-3 Define: Define the project scope and problem........35
4-4 Measure: Measure the quantitative data under study..36
4-5 Analyze: Analyze statistical results and find the root cause...................................................37
4-6 Improve: Take interventions to address the problem..41
4-7 Control: Sustain the improvement.................42
Chapter 5. Conclusion and future research............45
5-1 Conclusion.......................................45
5-2 Future Research and Outlook......................46
Reference...............................................47

參考文獻

[1] 花雀惠，謝月貞，邱靜娥，2011。以ECRS分析急診檢驗作業時間之改善。秀傳醫學雜誌，10卷3-4期，pp.121-130。
[2] 侯玉純，林素美，陳瓊汝，徐金民，楊慶晨，簡淑珍，廖佳慧，鄭瑞楠，簡惠萍，2020。剔除、合併、重排、簡化(ECRS)手法縮短新生兒加護病房共管備血時間，台灣醫學，24卷5期，pp. 567-575。
[3] 王乙茜，林立潔，魏雅雯，陳永鴻，2017。以ECRS技巧重建手術室骨銀行安全作業流程，醫院雙月刊，50卷6期，pp. 23-34。
[4] Antony, J., Kumar, M. and Madu, C. (2005), Six Sigma in small- and medium-sized UK manufacturing enterprises: some empirical observations. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 22, pp. 860-874. DOI: 10.1108.
[5] Antony, J. (2014), Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 257-264, DOI: 10.1108.
[6] Antony, J., Ghadge, A. and Ashby, S. A. (2018), Lean Six Sigma journey in a UK higher education institute: a case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 510-526, DOI:10.1142.
[7] Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2020), 2020 Guiding principles and standards for AACSB Business Accreditation.
[8] Bargerstock, A.S. and Richards, S.R. (2015), Case Study: Application of DMAIC to academic assessment in higher education, Quality Approaches in Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 2., pp. 31-40.
[9] Bârsan, R.M. and Codrea, F.M. (2019), Lean university: applying the ECRS method to improve an administrative process, MATEC Web of Conferences, DOI: 10.1051.
[10] Chang, D.S., Leu, J. D., Wang, W.S. and Chen, Y.C. (2020), Improving waiting time for surgical rooms using workflow and the six-sigma method. Total Quality, Management & Business Excellence, Vol. 31 Iss. 7-8, pp.869-886, DOI: 10.1080.
[11] Chang, Y.S., Lin, K. J. and Tu, T.W. (2016), The Impact of AACSB Accreditation on business school students in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Vol. 25, DOI: 10.1007.
[12] Gupta, S., Antony, J., Lacher, F. and Douglas, J. (2017), Lean Six Sigma for reducing student dropouts in higher education-an exploratory study. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 31 No. 4, DOI: 10.1080.
[13] Gygi, C., Williams, B. and DeCarlo, N. (2012), Lean Six Sigma for Dummies (2nd edition), Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[14] Hardin, J.R. and Stocks, M. (1995), The effect of AACSB accreditation on the recruitment of entry-level accountants. Issues in Accounting Education. Vol. 10, pp. 83-95.
[15] Heriot, K.C., Franklin, G. and Austin, W.W. (2009), Applying for Initial AACSB accreditation: an exploratory study to identify costs, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 84 Iss. 5, pp. 283-289, DOI: 10.3200.
[16] Hedrick, D.W., Henson, S.E., Krieg, J.M. and Wassell Jr., C.S. (2010), The effects of AACSB accreditation on faculty salaries and productivity, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 85 Iss. 5, pp.284-291, DOI: 10.1080.
[17] Kelendar, H. and Mohammed, M.A. (2020), Lean and the ECRS principle: developing a framework to minimise waste in healthcare sectors, International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp.98-110, DOI: 10.32827.
[18] Jie, J.C.R., Kamaruddin, S., and Azid, I.A. (2014), Implementing the Lean Six Sigma framework in a small medium enterprise (SME)—a case study in a printing company. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bali, Indonesia.
[19] Ke, S.W., Lin, W.C. and Tsai, C.F. (2016), Research performance of AACSB accredited institutions in Taiwan: before versus after accreditation. Springer Plus. Vol. 5 No. 1, DOI: 10.1186.
[20] Lee, K.L., Tai, C.T. and Sheen, G. J. (2013), Using LSS to improve the efficiency and quality of a refund process in a logistics center. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma; Bingley Vol. 4 Iss. 4, pp.409-424, DOI: 10.1108.
[21] Mazumder, Q. (2014), Applying Six Sigma in higher education quality improvement. 121th ASEE Conference, Vol. 24 No. 191, pp.1-14, DOI: 10.18260.
[22] Moore, M. and Nash, M. (2004), Becoming a Lean university, working paper series, Vol. 1 No. 2.
[23] Oguz, C., Kim, Y.W., Hutchison, J., and Han, S. H. (2012), Implementing Lean Six Sigma: A case study in concrete panel production. 20th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction.
[24] Pepper, M.P.J. and Spedding, T.A. (2010), The evolution of Lean Six Sigma, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 138-155.
[25] Sodhi, M.S. and Sodhi, N. S. (2005), Six Sigma pricing, Harvard Business Review.
[26] Sunder M. V. and Antony, J. (2018), A conceptual Lean Six Sigma framework for quality excellence in higher education institutions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 857-874.
[27] Suhardi, B., Anisa, N., and Laksono, P.W. (2019), Minimizing waste using lean manufacturing and ECRS principle in Indonesian furniture industry, Cogent Engineering, Vol. 6 Iss. 1, DOI: 10.1080.
[28] Thomas, A., Antony, J., Haven-Tang, C., Francis, M. and Fisher, R. (2017), Implementing Lean Six Sigma in to curriculum design and delivery - A case study in higher education. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 66 Iss. 5, pp. 577-597.
[29] Tsironis, L.K., and Psychogios, A.G. (2016), Road towards Lean Six Sigma in service industry: a multi-factor integrated framework. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 812-834.
[30] Womack, J. and Jones, D. (1996), Lean Thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 48 Iss. 11, DOI: 10.1038.

指導教授

陳振明(Jen-Ming Chen)

審核日期

2022-6-7

推文