摘要(英) |
In order to maintain a competitive advantage in the globalized market, companies need to consider the evaluation mechanism for supplier selection. Supplier selection decisions can be applied in many situations, such as multiple suppliers; or procurement at different stages of the product life cycle. At present, supply chain management also tends to maintain long-term cooperative relationships with suppliers to ensure more reliable suppliers. In the implementation of supply chain management, enterprises should not only care about the management of their internal environment, but also invest in the management of suppliers, so as to promote supply chain members to jointly assume environmental and social responsibilities. An excellent supplier selection mechanism can lay a good foundation for supplier relationship. A good supplier relationship can not only save the time and cost of the company, but also achieve the benefits of improving product quality, thereby enhancing its customer satisfaction. From the perspective of enterprises, most companies are trying to reduce their operating costs, but they hope to take into account the quality and meet the needs of customers. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to establish a good supplier selection method.
This research collects literature related to supplier selection, and collects the most influential selection items in supplier selection through expert questionnaires. Large dimension: quality dimension, cost dimension, delivery time dimension, technical dimension, service dimension, financial dimension and 18 selection items, summarizing and sorting out the importance of each criterion and evaluation attribute, as the supply It is the reference basis for supplier selection, and also serves as the improvement policy for existing suppliers in the future. |
參考文獻 |
一、中文文獻
1.王舒憶(2016),供應商評選研究-以 IC 封裝產業為例,中原大學工業與系統工程研究所,碩士論文。
2.白健二、陳文華、郭瑞祥、蔣明晃(1997),生產與作業管理,台北:國立空中大學。
3.朱華枝(2001),供應商選擇的關鍵因素對採購決策行為影響之探討─以我國航空工業為例,逢甲大學工業工程研究所,碩士論文。
4.余佩佩(2002),全面品質管理、供應商選擇、供應商參與、資訊運籌管理與組織績效關係之研究─台灣、香港之比較分析,國立成功大學工業管理科學研究所,碩士論文。
5.吳俊誼(2001),採購部門參與、供應商選擇標準、供應商發展活動與新產品開發績效關係之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
6.吳政達(1999),國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究,國立政治大學教育學系,博士論文。
7.林千仁(2000),供應商選擇標準與供應商發展活動對製造績效影響之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
8.林音芝(2012),供應商評選關鍵因素對採購決策影響之研究-以某國際知名廠商為例,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系,碩士論文。
9.徐燕娟(2007),以AHP法探討供應商遴選關鍵決定因素權重之研究-以筆記型電腦周邊配件為例,國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
10.許振邦,採購與供應管理,再版,智勝文化事業有限公司,台北,2008。
11.陳文風(2010),造船業採購供應商評選準則之研究,國立高雄海洋科技大學航運管理研究所,碩士論文。
12.陳國明(2012),以層級分析法建構供應商評選模式-以新竹網通公司為例,交通大學管理學院工業工程與管理學程學位,碩士論文。
13.陳國欽(2003),關係構面、產品構面及供應商特性對採購績效影響之研究―以台灣紡織產業布料供應商為例,輔仁大學織品服裝研究所,碩士論文。
14.黃健智(2020),運用層級分析法建構電機馬達產業核心材料之供應商評選模式 以C集團公司為例,國立中央大學,碩士論文。
15.黃智偉(2000),供應鏈管理下供應商選擇評估之研究-以臺灣地區中衛體系之汽機車業與電腦資訊業為例,國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所,碩士論文。
16.褚志鵬(2009),層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作,國立東華大學企業管理學系教學講義。
17.鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報。
18.鄧振源與曾國雄(1989),層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下),中國統計學報。
19.蕭登豐(2009),以AHP法探討知名國際快遞業者的客戶遴選指標的權重決定分析,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
20.謝顗臻(2019),應用層級分析法建構機車產業車架件供應商評選模型之研究-以Y公司為例,國立中央大學工業管理研究所,碩士論文。
21.謝鶴年(2008),零件供應商評選之關鍵因素-以中華汽車為例,中原大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
22.饒淑芳(2011),探討供應商評選準則之品質成本觀點,國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士班,碩士論文。
二、英文文獻
1.Choi, TY. And Hartley, JL.(1996), “An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain”,Journal of operations Management, Vol 14,No. 4, pp.333-343.
2.Christopher, M. & Lynette, R.(1999). Supply chain strategy: It’s impact on shareholder value. International Journal of Logistics Management, 10(1), 1-10.
3.Dickson, G. W.,(1966), “An analysis of vender selection system and decisions”, Journal of Purchasing, Vol. l2, No. 1, pp. 5-17.
4.Ellram, L(1991), “Supply-Chain Management: The Industrial OrganisationPerspective”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 13-22.
5.Gimenez-Garcia, V.M., Martinez-Parra, J.L., and Buffa, F.P., (2006), “Improving resource utilization in multi-unit networked organizations: The case of a spanish restaurant chain,” Tourism Management, Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 262-270.
6.Grittner, P.,(1966), “Four key ways to manage suppliers”,Management Review, American Management Association, New York.
7.Houlihan, J., (1984), “Supply Chain Management” , Proceeding of the 19th International Technical Conference of the British Production and Inventory Control Society,pp.101-110.
8.Houshyar, A, David, L., (1992), “A systematic Selection Procedure” ,Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol 23, No. 1-4, pp. 173-176.
9.Hsua, C.W., Kuo, T.C., Chen, S.H., and Hu, A. H.,(2011),“Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.56, pp. 164-172.
10.Krause, DR and Ellram, LM.(1997), “Critical elements of supplier development The buying-firm perspective”, European Journal Of Ourchasing & Supply Management, Vol.3, No. 1, pp. 21-31.
11.Leavy, B.(1994), “Two strategic perpecyives on the buyer-supplier relationship”,Production and Inventory management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 47-52.
12.Lehmann, D. R., & O′shaughnessy, J. (1974). “Difference in attribute importance for different industrial products”, The Journal of Marketing, 36-42.
13.Reck, R.F. and Long, B.G. (1988), “Purchasing: a competitive weapon”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 24, No. 4,pp. 2-8.
14.Saaty, T.L.,(1986)“Axiomatic foundation of analytic hierarchy process”, Management science, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 841-855.
15.Saaty, T.L.,(1990)“How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, pp.9-26.
16.Schorr, J.E.,(1998). Purchasing in the 21st century: A guide to state-of-the-art 52 techniques and strategies(2nd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
17.Thomas, D.J. and Griffin, P.M. (1996) Coordinated Supply Chain Management. European Journal of Operation Research, 94, 1-15.
18.Weber C.A., Current J.R and Benton, W.C., (1991)“Vendor selection criteria and methods”, European journal of operational research, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 2-18. |