學音樂=學樂器？音樂跨領域教育面臨的挑戰與契機-以「清華大學音樂科技與健康學分學程」為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：14

、訪客IP：18.223.205.84

姓名

黃冠綾(Guan-Ling Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

學音樂=學樂器？音樂跨領域教育面臨的挑戰與契機-以「清華大學音樂科技與健康學分學程」為例
(Learning Music = Learning Instruments? Challenges and Opportunities for Music Education Across Fields - An Example of the Music Technology and Health Credit Program at Tsinghua University)

相關論文

★ 工作滿足、領導行為、工作特性與人格特質對離職傾向之探討-以超大型會計師事務所審計人員為例	★ 以組織診斷模型診斷企業組織層級架構－以某公司為例
★ 科技產業組織診斷與分析之研究-以Q公司為例	★ 製造業推行六標準差的成功關鍵因素探討
★ 高職辦理輪調式建教班對學校經營績效之評估－以北區私立高職為例	★ 本國商業銀行經營績效之探討-資料包絡分析法之應用
★ 台灣中小企業創業動機與創業績效關係之研究	★ 員工當責與真誠領導之關聯性-以心理賦權與團隊凝聚力為中介變數
★ 以個人與環境適配為關鍵中介探討特定品牌領導對員工品牌權益之影響	★ 道德感讓你買更多綠色產品？從消費者產品知覺價格及品質角度來探討—以綠色程度做調節
★ 線上品牌社群該如何提升與粉絲的價值共創？以線上品牌社群活動與線下實體活動為中介變數探討	★ 農業創新服務模式之商業模式研究-以蜂巢數據科技有限公司為例
★ 燈⽕闌珊處的求職旅程：如何透過⼯作價值觀、雇主吸引⼒、激勵因⼦為求職者點亮路徑	★ 購買意願的幕後功臣：Instagram大小網紅的自我揭露對消費者自我一致性與感知真實的影響
★ 中小企業之組織診斷與分析－以A公司為例	★ 高科技產業人力資源發展與組織績效之研究－以新竹科學園區為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著資訊科技的發展以及社會人口的變遷，許多產業與產業之間的界線逐漸消弭，快速轉變的外在環境使得音樂人才對於跨領域的需求性也越來越高，然而過去跨領域課程研究較少「音樂」與其他科目結合的領域。因此本研究探討音樂跨領域教育面臨的挑戰與契機，並以清大音樂科技與健康學分學程為例，說明課程的實施狀況與課程績效，為後續跨領域音樂教育提供課程設計的方向與建議。
本研究以自然主義的研究法收集質性資料，資料包括訪問國立清華大學音樂科技與健康學分學程之學生、教師和業師、學程相關文件以及學程課程內容，並將所收集的質性資料進行分類，最後以內容分析法分析訪談資料。首先本研究採用重理解的課程設計(Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)為理論，來提出一個音樂跨領域教育課程設計整合理論架構，架構主要由「確定課程概念」、「課程評估調整」及「課程發展」三個部分組成。接著，本研究彙整出音樂跨領域教育面臨的挑戰包含「學生在跨領域學習當中的迷惘與不自信」、「學生性質差異較大」、「學校機構現有制度、設備及資源對開發跨領域課程的限制」、「缺乏融合跨學科知識的教學框架」、「教師專精於單一學科而缺乏跨學科教育內容知識」。最後，本研究建議清大音樂科技與健康學分學程長期以成立系所為目標，能更完善規劃及管理相關資源；短期則可藉由本研究之課程框架、課外輔助活動以及終身學習要點來降低跨領域教育挑戰對課程的影響。本研究希望上述建議可以提供未來音樂跨領域教育課程實施上的參考，以及後續課程設計研究之方向。

摘要(英)

With the development of information technology and demographic changes in society, the boundaries between industries are gradually dissolving, and the fast-changing external environment has led to an increasing demand for music talents in interdisciplinary fields. Therefore, this study examines the challenges and opportunities of cross-disciplinary music education, and uses the example of the Music Technology and Health sub-degree program at National Tsing Hua University to illustrate the implementation status and performance of the program, and to provide curriculum design directions and suggestions for the future of cross-disciplinary music education.
This study collected qualitative data through a naturalistic research method, including interviews with students, teachers, and instructors of the Music Technology and Health credit program at National Tsing Hua University, documents related to the credit program, and course content. Firstly, this study adopts the theory of Understanding by Design (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998) to propose an integrated theoretical framework for curriculum design in music interdisciplinary education, which consists of three parts: " Identify desired results ", " Determine evidence", and " Learning plan ". The study then identified the challenges of interdisciplinary music education, including "students′ confusion and lack of confidence in interdisciplinary learning", "students′ greater diversity in temperament", "limitations of school institutions′ existing systems, facilities, and resources in developing interdisciplinary curriculum", "lack of a teaching framework that integrates interdisciplinary knowledge", and "teachers′ lack of content knowledge in interdisciplinary education due to their specialization in a single discipline". Finally, this study suggests that the long term goal of the Music Technology and Health sub-degree program at National Tsing Hua University should be to establish a department to better plan and manage resources, while in the short term, the curriculum framework, extra-curricular activities, and lifelong learning elements of this study can be used to reduce the impact of cross-disciplinary education challenges on the program. It is hoped that the above recommendations will provide a reference for the implementation of future music interdisciplinary education programs and a direction for subsequent curriculum design research.

關鍵字(中)

★ 課程設計
★ 跨領域
★ 音樂跨領域
★ UBD課程設計

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

目錄
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
致謝詞 v
目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 viii
一、緒論 1
1-1研究動機與背景 1
1-2研究目的 5
1-3研究流程 6
二、文獻探討 7
2-1跨領域(Interdisciplinary) 7
2-1-1學科(Academic discipline)分界 7
2-1-2跨領域 8
2-1-3跨領域素養 8
2-1-4 建立跨領域課程的挑戰 9
2-2跨領域課程設計 10
2-2-1課程設計理論 11
2-2-2適合跨領域課程設計之理論 11
2-2-3跨領域教育的研究 14
2-3重理解的課程設計(Understanding by Design, UbD) 15
三、研究方法 18
3-1研究流程 18
3-2研究方法 21
3-2-1自然主義研究法 21
3-2-2研究對象 33
3-2-3訪談大綱 38
四、資料分析 39
4-1定義期望目標 42
4-1-1課程目標 42
4-1-2修課學生簡介 45
4-2課程評估 47
4-2-1學生對自己的評估 47
4-2-2老師對學生的評估 49
4-3課程發展與回饋 51
4-3-1課程發展 51
4-3-2課程回饋 56
4-4後續建議與心得 60
4-4-1建議 61
4-4-2心得 65
第五章結論與建議 69
5-1「音樂科技與健康學分學程」架構 71
5-1-1確定課程目標 71
5-1-2課程評估調整 73
5-1-3課程發展 75
5-1-4師生對「音樂科技與健康學分學程」回饋及分析 78
5-1-5未來跨領域建議與心得 79
5-2分析音樂跨領域課程開發面臨的挑戰與契機： 82
5-3後續音樂跨領域教育課程設計與實施方向之建議： 85
5-4研究貢獻 88
5-4研究限制與後續研究建議 91
參考文獻 92
附錄二初期專訪授課教授之訪談題綱 106
附錄三初期專訪業師之訪談題綱 109
附錄四初期專訪學生之訪談題綱 113
附錄五受訪對象為大學生之訪談提綱修改版 115
附錄六受訪對象為INI5PR之訪談提綱修改版 119
附錄七受訪對象為INI6PR之訪談提綱修改版 121
附錄八受訪對象為INI4PR專家老師之訪談提綱修改版 124

參考文獻

〔1〕李韋毅 (2013)。跨領域人才培育之學習模式研究-以機械工程專業背景跨領域學習工業設計為例。國立雲林科技大學工業設計系碩士班碩士論文，雲林縣。
〔2〕國立清華大學音樂科技與健康中心 (2021)。 UFO前瞻計畫_清大音樂第三期_公開版。
〔3〕國立清華大學音樂科技與健康中心 (2022)。修讀規定。擷取自音樂科技與健康學分學程: https://rcmth.site.nthu.edu.tw/p/412-1145-17567.php?Lang=zh-tw。
〔4〕國立清華大學音樂科技與健康中心 (2022)。課程規劃。擷取自音樂科技與健康學分學程: https://rcmth.site.nthu.edu.tw/p/412-1145-17568.php?Lang=zh-tw。
〔5〕廖思涵 (2021)。媒介化下傳統音樂工作者職涯轉型研究。國立高雄科技大學文化創意產業系碩士論文。
〔6〕謝宇程 (2015)。一個畢業生的提醒：讓孩子讀音樂班前，你知道99%音樂系學生，生涯高峰在畢業當天嗎？。商業週刊。
〔7〕 Aldrich, J. (2014). Interdisciplinarity: Its role in a discipline-based academy. New York: Oxford University Press.
〔8〕 Ashby, I. & Exter, M. (2019). Designing for Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education: Considerations for Instructional Designers. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 63(2), 202–208.
〔9〕 Baker, W. & Daumer, E. (2015). Designing interdisciplinary instruction exploring disciplinary and conceptual differences as a resource. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(1), 38–53.
〔10〕 Bresler, L. (2002). Out of the Trenches: The Joys (and risks) of Cross-Disciplinary Collaborations. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 152, 17 – 39.
〔11〕 Bridle, H., Vrieling, A., Cardillo, M., Araya, Y., & Hinojosa, L. (2013). Preparing for an interdisciplinary future: a perspective from earlycareer researchers. Futures, 53, 22–32.
〔12〕 Burke, J. W. (1989). The implementation of NVQs. In J. W. Burke (Ed.), Competency based education and training, 109 – 131. Bristol, PA : Psychology Press.
〔13〕 Burrack, F., & McKenzie, T. (2005). Enhanced Student Learning through Cross-Disciplinary Projects. Music Educators Journal, 91(5), 45–50.
〔14〕 Bushway, D. J., Dodge, L. G., & Long, C. S. (2018). A leader′s guide to competency-based education: From inception to implementation. Stylus.
〔15〕 Carrier, S., Wiebe, E. N., Teachout, D., & Gray, P. (2011). BioMusic in the Classroom: Interdisciplinary Elementary Science and Music Curriculum Development. School Science & Mathematics, 111(8), 425–434. .
〔16〕 Cooper, G. (2012). A disciplinary matter critical sociology, academic governance and interdisciplinarity. Sociology, 47(1), 74–89.
〔17〕 Fan Xumei, Sandra, L., Kale, D., Mayer, W., & Tammy, P. (2022). Identifying the Needs of Prekindergarten Children: A Focus on Health, Wellbeing, and Family Environment. Early Childhood Education Journal; Jun2022, Vol. 50 Issue 5, 823-840.
〔18〕 Gantogtokh, O., & Quinlan, K. M. (2017). Challenges of designing interdisciplinary postgraduate curricula: case studies of interdisciplinary master’s programmes at a research-intensive UK university. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 569–586. .
〔19〕 Gay, G. (1985). Curriculum development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education(pp. 1170-1179). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
〔20〕 Haas, B. A., Sheehan, J. M., Stone, J. A. M., & Hammer-Beem, M. J. (2009). Application of the Newell Liberal Arts Model for Interdisciplinary Course Design and Implementation. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(10), 579–582.
〔21〕 Haynes, A. (2017). In support of disciplinarity in teaching sociology: reflections from Ireland. Teaching Sociology, 45(1), 54–64.
〔22〕 Jackson, D., Shan, H., & Meek, S. (2022). Enhancing graduates’ enterprise capabilities through work-integrated learning in co-working spaces. Higher Education (00181560), 84(1), 101–120.
〔23〕 Jacobs, H. H. (Ed.). (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria,VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
〔24〕 Kearns, G. S. (2014). The Importance of Accounting Information Systems in the Accounting Curricula: A CPA Perspective. AIS Educator Journal, 9(1), 24-40.
〔25〕 Keller, S., Craig, M. & Caroline, C. (2011). Employability Skills: Student Perceptions of an IS Final Year Capstone Subject. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 10 (2): 4–15.
〔26〕 Khajeloo, M., Birt, J. A., Kenderes, E. M., Siegel, M. A, Nguyen, H., Ngo, L. T., . . . Cummings, K. (2022). Challenges and Accomplishments of Practicing Formative Assessment: a Case Study of College Biology Instructors’ Classrooms. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 20(2), 237–254.
〔27〕 Klein, J. (2006). A platform for a shared discourse of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 10–18.
〔28〕 Klein, J. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinary. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
〔29〕 Klein, M. F. (1985). Curriculum design. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 1163-1170). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
〔30〕 Kuanchin, C., Razi, M., & Rienzo, T. (2011). Intrinsic Factors for Continued ERP Learning: A Precursor to Interdisciplinary ERP Curriculum Design. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(2), 149–176. .
〔31〕 Langub, L., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2017). Rethinking Instructional Technology to Improve Pedagogy for Digital Literacy: A Design Case in a Graduate Early Childhood Education Course. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 61(4), 322–330.
〔32〕 Lattuca, L., Voigt, L., & Fath, K. (2004). Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23–48.
〔33〕 Lee, N, & Loton, D. (2019). Capstone purposes across disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 134–150.
〔34〕 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
〔35〕 Long, C., Davidson, S., & Bernoteit, S. (2019). Leveraging competency-based education models to promote equity and student success: The role of the SHEEO [Lecture]. SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
〔36〕 Long, M., Cottrell-Yongye, A., & Huynh, T. (2020). Backward Redesign of a Nonmajors’ Biology Course at a Two-Year Technical College. . Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(6), 7–16.
〔37〕 Maeda, J. (2011). STEM to STEAM. http://www.core77.com/posts/20692/getting-steamy-in-rhode-island-20692
〔38〕 McNamara, Judith, Sally, M. K., Des Butler, Rachael M. Field, C. B., & Natalie, G. (2012). WorkIntegrated Learning as a Component of the Capstone Experience in Undergraduate law. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 13 (1), 1–12.
〔39〕 Nygren, H., Nissinen, K., Hämäläinen, R., & Wever, B. (2019). Lifelong learning: Formal, non‐formal and informal learning in the context of the use of problem‐solving skills in technology‐rich environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1759–1770.
〔40〕 Orzolek, D. C. (2018). Collaborative Teaching: Lessons Learned. College Teaching, 66(3), 124–129.
〔41〕 Ozkan, D. S., Mcnair, L. D., & Bairaktarova, D. (2019). Teacher Learner, Learner Teacher: Parallels and Dissonance in an Interdisciplinary Design Education Minor. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(3), 226–235.
〔42〕 Van den Bossche P. Minds in teams. (2006). The influence of social and cognitive factors on team learning. PhD Thesis.Maastricht: Maastricht University .
〔43〕 RepkoA. (2008). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. . Thousand Oaks: Sage.
〔44〕 Ritchie, A. J., & Plugge, E. (2015). Student Diversity and Learning Through Group Formative Assessment. In Masters Level Teaching, Learning and Assessment: Issues in Design and Delivery, 189–192.
〔45〕 Römgens, I., Scoupe, R., & Beausaert, S. (2020). Unraveling the concept of employability, bringing together research on employability in higher education and the workplace. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2588–2603.
〔46〕 Sandefur, R. (2016). Commentary on Carroll Seron’s presidential address: embrace disciplinarily and talk across it. Law and Society Review, 50(1), 34–39.
〔47〕 Schermer, Timothy, & Gray, S. (2012). The senior capstone: Transformative experiences in the liberal arts. Final report to the Teagle Foundation.
〔48〕 Spady, W. G. (1977). Competency based education: A bandwagon in search of a definition. Educational Researcher, 6 (1), 9–14.
〔49〕 SpeedC. J., Kleiner, A, & Macaulay, J. O. (2015). Broadening student learning experiences via a novel cross-disciplinary art and anatomy education program—A case study. Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 86–91.
〔50〕 Spelt, E. J. H., Luning, P. A., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Mulder, M. (2015). Constructively aligned teaching and learning in higher education in engineering: What do students perceive as contributing to the learning of interdisciplinary thinking? European Journal of Engineering Education, 40 (5), 459–475.
〔51〕 StalmeijerR. E., Gijselaers W. H., WolfhagenI. H. A. P., HarendzaS., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2007). How interdisciplinary teams can create multi-disciplinary education: the interplay between team processes and educational quality. Medical Education, 41(11), 1059–1066.
〔52〕 Sumrall, W., & Sumrall, K. (2018). Understanding by Design. Design. Science & Children, 56(1), 48–54.
〔53〕 Nancy, S. k. (2018). Creating a New Engineering Technology Program Using the UbD Approach. Journal of Engineering Technology, 35(2), 8–13.
〔54〕 Talley, N. B. (2014). Are You Doing It Backward? Improving Information Literacy Instruction Using the AALL Principles and Standards for Legal Research Competency, Taxonomies, and Backward Design. Law Library Journal, 106(1), 47–68.
〔55〕 The American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2022). VALUE Rubrics. VALUE Research Hub: https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics
〔56〕 The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2020). Guiding principles and standards for business accreditation. AACSB.
〔57〕 University of Delaware. (2022). University of Delaware General Education Rubrics. Retrieved from University of Delaware: https://ctal.udel.edu/resources-2/rubrics/
〔58〕 University of Wisconsin. (2022). Assessment Resources. 擷取自 UniversityofWisconsin: https://uwm.edu/academicaffairs/facultystaff/assessment-of-student-learning/assessment-resources/
〔59〕 Weinberg, A. E., & Sample McMeeking, L. B. (2017). Toward Meaningful Interdisciplinary Education: High School Teachers’ Views of Mathematics and Science Integration. School Science & Mathematics, 117(5), 204–213.
〔60〕 Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. . Association for Supervision & Curriculum Developme.
〔61〕 Woodside, J. M., Augustine, Jr. F. K., Chambers, V., & Mendoza, M. (2020). Integrative Learning and Interdisciplinary Information Systems Curriculum Development in Accounting Analytics. . Journal of Information Systems Education, 31(2), 147–156.
〔62〕 Wright, B. M., Hornsby, L., Marlowe, K. F., Fowlin, J., & Surry, D. W. (2018). Innovating Pharmacy Curriculum through Backward Design. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 62(3), 224–229.
〔63〕 Yakman, G. (2010). What is the point of STE@M?- A brief overview. https://www.academia.edu/8113832/What_is_the_Point_of_STEAM_A_Brief_Overview_of_STEAM_Education
〔64〕 Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2016). Understanding by Design (UbD) in EFL Teaching: Teachers’Professional Development and Students’ Achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(2), 437–461.

指導教授

李憶萱

審核日期

2022-8-30

推文