不可靠供應鏈下零售商的定價和採購策略

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：20

、訪客IP：18.119.104.238

姓名

曹竤鈞(Hung-Chun Tsao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

不可靠供應鏈下零售商的定價和採購策略
(Pricing and ordering strategy of retailer when facing unreliable supply chain)

相關論文

★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例	★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究	★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業	★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標	★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理	★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究	★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率－以Ａ公司塗料充填流程改善為例	★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例	★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

全球供應鏈變得越來越複雜且風險不斷增加。這對企業帶來了更多的挑戰和困難。不可靠供應是指當供應鏈中的某個環節出現問題時，例如原材料短缺、生產設備故障或物流延誤，都可能導致供應鏈無法正常運作，進而影響企業的業務運營和客戶滿意度。因此了解和解決供應鏈不可靠供應的問題對於企業實現長期可持續發展非常重要。可以通過與供應商建立良好的合作關係，加強溝通和協調，以減少供應鏈中的不確定性和風險。而通路協調已經廣泛運用在許多論文中，其目的是為了讓整體供應鏈利潤最大化，讓供應商和零售商雙方都比沒協調的時候來的大。
　　為了更好地理解和解決這個問題，本研究構建了四種不同的模型。在模型中零售商會因為與供應商認知的風險不一樣，導致期望利潤出現偏差。我們分別討論供應鏈成員在四種環境中的決策行為。同時，研究探討如何利用協調機制來解決供應鏈成員因錯誤決策而導致利潤偏差的問題。協調機制可以幫助不同供應鏈成員共享信息、協同決策，從而降低供應鏈中的不確定性和風險，提高整個供應鏈的可靠性和效能。總結而言，本研究通過建立四種不同模型來描繪供應鏈成員的決策行為，並利用協調機制來解決供應鏈中錯誤決策導致的利潤偏差問題。由研究結果可以觀察到，站在零售商的立場，協調機制在四種情境中不是全然有效。但對供應商來說可以有效的緩解風險。

摘要(英)

Global supply chain become more complex and risk. This brings more challenges and difficulties to enterprises. Therefore, for businesses to achieve long-term development, it is crucial to comprehend and address the issue of unreliable supply chain. It is possible to reduce uncertainty and risk in the supply chain by establishing a good cooperative relationship with suppliers and strengthening communication and coordination. Channel coordination has been widely used in many papers, and Its goal is to increase the whole supply chain′s profit such that both the supplier and the retailer benefit more than they would without coordination.
　　With the goal to comprehend and resolve this problem better., four different models were constructed in this paper. In the model, because the retailer perceives risk differently than the supplier does, the predicted profit will be biased in the retailer′s decision. We discuss supply chain members′ decision-making behavior in each of the four scenarios. At the same time, the study explores how to use the coordination mechanism to solve the problem of profit deviation caused by wrong supply chain members′ decisions. The coordination mechanism can assist diverse supply chain members in sharing information and coordinating decision-making, decreasing uncertainty and risk in the supply chain and enhancing overall supply chain reliability and efficiency. In summary, this paper describes the decision-making behavior of supply chain members by establishing four different models, and uses the coordination mechanism to solve the problem of profit deviation caused by wrong decisions in the supply chain. The research observations show that from the retailer′s perspective, the coordination mechanism is not fully effective in the four scenarios. But it can effectively mitigate risk for supplier.

關鍵字(中)

★ 不可靠供應
★ 報童問題
★ 協調機制

關鍵字(英)

★ Unreliable supply chain
★ Newsvendor problem
★ Coordination Mechanism

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
Contents iii
List of tables v
List of figures vi
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Motivation and Objection 2
1.3 Research framework 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 Customer’s utility and surplus 4
2.2 Newsvendor problem 5
2.3 Unreliable supply chain 6
2.4 Coordination Mechanism 7
Chapter 3 Model 9
3.1 Environment Statement 9
3.2 Notations and demand function 10
3.3 With reliable supply 12
3.4 With unreliable supply 13
3.4.1 Model 1 15
3.4.2 Model 2 16
3.4.3 Model 3 18
3.4.4 Model 4 19
3.5 Revenue and risk sharing contract 20
3.5.1 Model 1 21
3.5.2 Model 2 22
3.5.3 Model 3 24
3.5.4 Model 4 25
Chapter 4 Numerical Example 27
4.1 The centralized coordinate system 27
4.2 With reliable supply 28
4.3 With unreliable supply 29
4.4 Revenue and risk sharing contract 33
Chapter 5 Sensitive analysis 35
5.1 Sensitivity analysis of parameter β 35
5.2 Sensitivity analysis of parameter c 42
5.3 Sensitivity analysis of parameter ρ 48
Chapter 6 Conclusion and Future Research 51
Reference 54

參考文獻

1. Agrawal, V., & Seshadri, S. (2000). Impact of uncertainty and risk aversion on price and order quantity in the newsvendor problem. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2(4), 410–423.
2. Blome, C., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Supply chain risk management in financial crises-a multiple case-study approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 43-57.
3. Bode, C., Wagner, S. M., Petersen, K. J., & Ellram, L. M. (2011). Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 833–856.
4. Chen, Y. (Frank), Xu, M., & Zhang, Z. G. (2009). Technical Note—A risk-averse newsvendor model under the cVaR criterion. Operations Research, 57(4), 1040–1044.
5. Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 35-52.
6. Hu, X., Gurnani, H., & Wang, L. (2013). Managing risk of supply disruptions: Incentives for capacity restoration. Production and Operations Management, 22(1), 137-150.
7. Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53-68.
8. Krishna, A. (1992). The normative impact of consumer price expectations for multiple brands on consumer purchase behavior. Marketing Science, 11(3), 266-286.
9. Krishnamurthi, L., & Raj, S. P. (1988). A model of brand choice and purchase quantity price sensitivities. Marketing Science, 7(1), 1-20.
10. Lau, H. 1997. Simple formulas for the expected costs in the newsvendor problem: An educational Note. European Journal of Operational Research 100 557–561.
11. Li, J., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2010). Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 137–150.
12. Lippman, S. A., & McCardle, K. F. (1997). The competitive newsvendor. Operations Research, 45(1), 54–65.
13. Mostard, J., de Koster, R., & Teunter, R. (2005). The distribution-free newsvendor problem with resalable returns. International Journal of Production Economics, 97(3), 329–342.
14. Pasternack, B. A. (2005). Using revenue sharing to achieve channel coordination for a newsboy type inventory model. Supply chain management: Models, applications, and research directions, 117-136.
15. Petruzzi, N. C., & Dada, M. (1999). Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions. Operations Research, 47(2), 183–194.
16. Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International journal of production economics, 103(2), 451-488.
17. Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 9(1), 33–45.
18. Tang, S. Y., Gurnani, H., & Gupta, D. (2014). Managing disruptions in decentralized supply chains with endogenous supply process reliability. Production and Operations Management, 23(7), 1198-1211.
19. Varun Guptaa , Dmitry Ivanov , Tsan-Ming Choi.(2021). Competitive pricing of substitute products under supply disruption. Omega,101,102279.
20. Wagner, S. M. and Bode, C. (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of business logistics, 29(1):307–325.
21. Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of applied mechanics.

指導教授

曾富祥(Fu-Shiang Tseng)

審核日期

2023-7-10

推文