博碩士論文 110525006 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:41 、訪客IP:3.135.190.232
姓名 張育甄(Yu-Chen Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 軟體工程研究所
論文名稱 利用情繫理論與共同目標設計具長期依戀關係的寵物機器人以提升學習成效
(Utilizing Bonding Theory and Common Goal Design to Enhance Learning Performance in Long-term Attachment Relationships with Pet Robots)
相關論文
★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索:學習效能評鑑之工具★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 教育機器人已應用於各種領域中,大多擔任教師或同伴等角色,且大多研究皆證實教育機器人可以有效提升學習動機及學習成效。另外有研究提及,在新穎效應結束後,人們會對機器人失去興趣並且改變態度,而大多數的研究較少考慮到長期關係的重要性。而透過依戀關係及建立共享經驗便是維持人機關係的方式之一,共享經驗可初步建立人機情感聯繫,接著產生的依戀關係讓兩者感情更為緊密,進而推進學習動力。但這樣的關係卻鮮少被用於教育領域中。
  為了讓教育機器人不再因時間推進而減少學習次數,本研究提出嶄新的教育機器人的設計模式,將寵物機器人應用於教育領域中,並引入情繫理論及在共享經驗中加入共同目標來維持機器人與學習者的長期關係。藉由主人照顧寵物及寵物陪伴支持主人的互動模式來建立依戀關係,再利用學習的共同目標來建立寵物與主人間的共享經驗,藉此提升學生學習時間,推進學習動力,最終提升成效。
  為了驗證此學習模式是否能提升學習成效,本研究進一步將系統應用於實際課程中。研究結果證明,使用具長期依戀關係的寵物機器人,比起一般僅陪伴學習的學習夥伴機器人,學生會因此而更投入學習活動,進而提升學習成效。使用寵物機器人的學生不會因為時間推進而減短學習時間,也會因與寵物機器人的情繫關係而提升學習動機,達到更好的學習效果。
摘要(英) Educational robots have been widely applied in various domains, serving roles such as teachers or peers, and also previous studies have shown their effectiveness in enhancing learning performance. However, people often overlook the importance of long-term relationships. Because once the novelty wears off, people tend to lose interest in robots and change their attitudes. Building attachment through shared experience is one of the ways to maintain human-robot relationships. Shared experience can initially establish a human-robot emotional connection, leading to closer attachment relationships and ultimately boosting learning motivation. However, such relationships are rarely used in education.
In order to prevent educational robots from reducing the number of learning times due to time advancement, this study proposes a new design pattern for educational robots by using pet robots into the educational context. Using bonding theory and adding common goals into shared experiences to maintain long-term learner-robot relationships. Build an attachment relationship through the interaction model of taking care of the pet and the pet accompanies the owner, and then use the common goal of learning to establish a shared experience between learners and their pet robots, thereby increasing learning time, promoting learning motivation, and ultimately improving learning outcomes.
To verify whether this learning model can improve learning outcomes, this study applies this system to and actual learning environments. The results show that compared with a learning partner robot, students using pet robots with long-term attachment relationships will be more involved in learning activities and achieve better learning performance. Students who use pet robots will not shorten their learning time and their learning motivation is enhanced by the emotional bond formed with the robotic pets, leading to superior learning performance.
關鍵字(中) ★ 教育機器人
★ 寵物機器人
★ 情繫理論
★ 共享經驗
★ 虛實整合
★ 混和實境
★ 長期關係
關鍵字(英) ★ Educational robot
★ Pet robot
★ Bonding theory
★ Shared experience
★ Virtual-real integration
★ Mixed reality
★ Long-term relationship
論文目次 摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 XIV
一、 緒論 1
1-1. 研究背景 1
1-2. 研究目標 2
1-3. 研究問題 3
二、 相關研究 4
2-1. 教育機器人 4
2-2. 寵物機器人 5
2-3. 情繫理論與依戀關係 6
2-4. 共同目標作為共享經驗對學習成效的影響 7
2-5. 小結 8
三、 以人為中心的設計-寵物機器人系統 9
3-1. 系統架構與設計 9
3-1-1. 系統設計概念 9
3-1-2. 系統架構 11
3-1-3. 開發環境 13
3-2. 系統解決方式 14
3-2-1. 寵物機器人的對話模型 15
3-2-2. 網頁中的寵物機器人 16
3-2-3. 現實中的寵物機器人 21
3-2-4. 劇場中的機器人 22
3-3. 以使用者為中心的設計 23
3-3-1. 教師介面 23
3-3-1-1. 教學模式 23
3-3-1-2. 教師使用介面 25
3-3-2. 學習者介面 36
3-3-2-1. 學習模式 36
3-3-2-2. 線上學習網站 37
3-3-2-3. 數位雙生劇場 42
四、 實驗設計 45
4-1. 實驗假設 45
4-2. 研究對象 45
4-3. 教材內容 45
4-4. 實驗流程 45
4-5. 實驗評估與施測工具 51
4-5-1. 課前前測與課後後測 51
4-5-2. 施測工具-問卷 51
4-5-3. 施測工具-問卷 52
五、 實驗結果與討論 53
5-1. 前後測結果與討論 53
5-1-1. 常態分佈檢定 53
5-1-2. ANCOVA 檢定 53
5-2. 線上學習網站紀錄與討論 55
5-2-1. 學習活動紀錄 55
5-2-2. 上線時間 57
5-2-3. 與寵物的互動 58
5-3. 問卷結果與討論 59
5-3-1. 問卷信度分析 59
5-3-2. 問卷結果描述 59
5-4. 訪談結果與討論 61
六、 結論與未來研究 65
6-1. 結論 65
6-2. 未來研究方向 65
6-2-1. 寵物機器人設計 66
6-2-2. 實體寵物機器人的互動 66
6-2-3. 應用領域 67
參考文獻 68
附錄一、情境教材 77
附錄二、前測試卷 83
附錄三、後測試卷 86
附錄四、實驗問卷 89
附錄五、論文關鍵字(英文版) 90
附錄六、圖表英文對照 93
參考文獻 林宏軒(2022)。以建立互賴關係設計的機器人寵物來提升學習成效。國立中央大學資訊工程系學位論文。
黃招憲、郭德信、王淑麗(2005)。 餐旅日語(上)。 致良出版社。
黃招憲、許惠端、王靖絜(2010)。 餐旅日語(下)。 致良出版社。
Abrar, M. M., & Islam, R. (2020). Design and development of a biologically inspired robotic cat for research and education. In 2020 30th International Conference on Computer Theory and Applications, 82-87.
Affectional bond. (2023, July 1). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affectional_bond
Ahmad, M. I., Mubin, O., Shahid, S., & Orlando, J. (2019). Robot’s adaptive emotional feedback sustains children’s social engagement and promotes their vocabulary learning: a long-term child–robot interaction study. Adaptive Behavior, 27(4), 243-266.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. N. (2015). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Psychology Press.
Al Hakim, V. G., Yang, S. H., Liyanawatta, M., Wang, J. H., & Chen, G. D. (2022). Robots in situated learning classrooms with immediate feedback mechanisms to improve students′ learning performance. Computers & Education, 182, 104483.
Almousa, O., & Alghowinem, S. (2023). Conceptualization and development of an autonomous and personalized early literacy content and robot tutor behavior for preschool children. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 33(2), 261-291.
Atman Uslu, N., Yavuz, G. Ö., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2022). A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-25.
Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S., & Nika, P. (2018). How does the degree of guidance support students’ metacognitive and problem solving skills in educational robotics?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 70-85.
Baxter, P., Ashurst, E., Read, R., Kennedy, J., & Belpaeme, T. (2017). Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning. PloS one, 12(5), e0178126.
Baxter, P., Belpaeme, T., Canamero, L., Cosi, P., Demiris, Y., Enescu, V., ... & Wood, R. (2011). Long-term human-robot interaction with young users. In IEEE/ACM human-robot interaction 2011 conference, 80.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics, 3(21), eaat5954.
Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational psychology review, 21, 141-170.
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293-327.
Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological science, 25(12), 2209-2216.
Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds: II. Some principles of psychotherapy: The Fiftieth Maudsley Lecture (expanded version). The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(5), 421-431.
Bowlby, J. (1958). The Nature of the Childs Tie to his Mother. International Journal of. Psycho-Analysis, 39, 350-373.
Bravo, R., Catalán, S., & Pina, J. M. (2019). Analyzing teamwork in higher education: An empirical study on the antecedents and consequences of team cohesiveness. Studies in Higher Education, 44(7), 1153-1165.
Brown, C. L., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2021). Characteristics and consequences of co-experienced positive affect: understanding the origins of social skills, social bonds, and caring, healthy communities. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 58–63.
Caballero-Gonzalez, Y. A., Muñoz-Repiso, A. G. V., & García-Holgado, A. (2019). Learning computational thinking and social skills development in young children through problem solving with educational robotics. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing Multiculturality, 19-23.
Calvo-Barajas, N., & Castellano, G. (2022). Understanding Children’s Trust Development through Repeated Interactions with a Virtual Social Robot. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1451-1458.
Chen, H., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2020). Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Computers & Education, 150, 103836.
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98-101
Coninx, A., Baxter, P., Oleari, E., Bellini, S., Bierman, B., Henkemans, O., ... & Belpaeme, T. (2016). Towards long-term social child-robot interaction: using multi-activity switching to engage young users. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction.
Daniela, L., & Strods, R. (2016). The role of robotics in promoting the learning motivation to decrease the early school leaving risks. In ROBOESL Conference, 26, 7-13.
Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M. L., Koay, K. L., & Werry, I. (2005). What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler?. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 1192-1197.
De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective. Journal of applied psychology, 92(3), 628.
De Graaf, M. M., Allouch, S. B., & Klamer, T. (2015). Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Computers in human behavior, 43, 1-14.
de Haas, M., Vogt, P., van den Berghe, R., Leseman, P., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Willemsen, B., ... & Krahmer, E. (2022). Engagement in longitudinal child-robot language learning interactions: Disentangling robot and task engagement. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, 100501.
Del Duchetto, F., & Hanheide, M. (2022). Learning on the Job: Long-Term Behavioural Adaptation in Human-Robot Interactions. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3), 6934-6941.
D′Este, C. (2014). Beyond Patting: The Role of Attention in Expanding the Human-Pet Robot Relationship. In Workshops in ICSR 2014.
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.
Dheeraj, D., & Kumari, R. (2013). Effect of co-operative learning on achievement in environmental science of school student. International Journal of Scientific and research publications, 3(2), 1-3.
Diaz, M., Nuno, N., Saez-Pons, J., Pardo, D. E., & Angulo, C. (2011). Building up child-robot relationship for therapeutic purposes: From initial attraction towards long-term social engagement. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG), 927-932.
Díaz-Boladeras, M. (2023). Bond formation with pet-robots: An integrative approach. Current Psychology, 42(4), 2591-2608.
Donnermann, M., Schaper, P., & Lugrin, B. (2020). Integrating a social robot in higher education–a field study. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 573-579.
Donnermann, M., Schaper, P., & Lugrin, B. (2022). Social robots in applied settings: A long-term study on adaptive robotic tutors in higher education. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9.
Dziergwa, M., Kaczmarek, M., Kaczmarek, P., Kędzierski, J., & Wadas-Szydłowska, K. (2018). Long-term cohabitation with a social robot: a case study of the influence of human attachment patterns. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10, 163-176.
Educational robotics. (2023, May 23). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational_robotics
Eliot, A.J., Reis, H.T. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 317-331.
Elloumi, L., Bossema, M., De Droog, S. M., Smakman, M. H., Van Ginkel, S., Ligthart, M. E., ... & Allouch, S. B. (2022). Exploring requirements and opportunities for social robots in primary mathematics education. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 316-322.
Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., & Orús, C. (2019). The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of business research, 100, 547-560.
Fleming, T. (2008). A Secure Base for Adult Learning: Attachment Theory and Adult Education. Adult learner: the Irish journal of adult and community education, 33, 53.
Fogelson, D. M., Rutledge, C., & Zimbro, K. S. (2022). The impact of robotic companion pets on depression and loneliness for older adults with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 40(4), 397-409.
Gena, C., Mattutino, C., Perosino, G., Trainito, M., Vaudano, C., & Cellie, D. (2020). Design and development of a social, educational and affective robot. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS), 1-8.
George, D. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e. Pearson Education India.
Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. 1. Pers. Soc. Psychol, 52(5), 1.
Heerink, M., Díaz, M., Albo-Canals, J., Angulo, C., Barco, A., Casacuberta, J., & Garriga, C. (2012). A field study with primary school children on perception of social presence and interactive behavior with a pet robot. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 1045-1050.
Heljakka, K., Lamminen, A., & Ihamäki, P. (2021). A model for enhancing emotional literacy through playful learning with a robot dog. In 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME), 1-7.
Hood, D., Lemaignan, S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). When children teach a robot to write: An autonomous teachable humanoid which uses simulated handwriting. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 83-90.
Huber, A., Weiss, A., & Rauhala, M. (2016). The ethical risk of attachment how to identify, investigate and predict potential ethical risks in the development of social companion robots. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 367-374.
Ihamäki, P., & Heljakka, K. (2020). Social and emotional learning with a robot dog: technology, empathy and playful learning in kindergarten. In 9th Annual Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and Education Conference 6-8 of January 2020.
Irfan, B., Ramachandran, A., Spaulding, S., Glas, D. F., Leite, I., & Koay, K. L. (2019). Personalization in long-term human-robot interaction. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 685-686.
Janssen, J. B., van der Wal, C. C., Neerincx, M. A., & Looije, R. (2011). Motivating children to learn arithmetic with an adaptive robot game. In International conference on social robotics (pp. 153-162). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1-26.
Kaplan, F. (2001). Artificial attachment: Will a robot ever pass ainsworth’s strange situation test. In Proceedings of humanoids, 125-132.
Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 3230-3235). IEEE.
Kidd, C. D., Taggart, W., & Turkle, S. (2006). A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006, 3972-3976.
Klamer, T., & Allouch, S. B. (2010). Acceptance and use of a social robot by elderly users in a domestic environment. In 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 1-8.
Koh, W. Q., Toomey, E., Flynn, A., & Casey, D. (2022). Determinants of implementing of pet robots in nursing homes for dementia care. BMC geriatrics, 22(1), 1-12.
Konijn, E. A., Jansen, B., Mondaca Bustos, V., Hobbelink, V. L., & Preciado Vanegas, D. (2022). Social robots for (second) language learning in (migrant) primary school children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1-17.
Lancheros-Cuesta, D., & Fabregat, R. (2022). Educational Robotics Intervention in the Motivation of Students. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 17(2), 131-139.
Laureano-Cruces, A. L., & Rodriguez-Garcia, A. (2012). Design and implementation of an educational virtual pet using the OCC theory. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 3, 61-71.
Lawton, L. (2017). Taken by the Tamagotchi: How a toy changed the perspective on mobile technology. The iJournal: Student Journal of the University of Toronto′s Faculty of Information, 2(2).
Leite, I., Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2014). Empathic Robots for Long-term Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3), 329–341.
Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 291-308.
Leoste, J., Tammemäe, T., Eskla, G., San Martín López, J., Pastor, L., & Blasco, E. P. (2022). Bee-Bot Educational Robot as a Means of Developing Social Skills Among Children with Autism-Spectrum Disorders. In Robotics in Education: RiE 2021 12, 14-25.
Lin, C., Faas, T., & Brady, E. (2017). Exploring affection-oriented virtual pet game design strategies in VR attachment, motivations and expectations of users of pet games. In 2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 362-369.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current directions in psychological science, 15(5), 265-268.
Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
Magno, C. (2010). Assessing academic self-regulated learning among Filipino college students: The factor structure and item fit. The international Journal of Educational and psychological assessment, 5.
McCardle, L., Webster, E. A., Haffey, A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2017). Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: Goal properties and patterns. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2153-2169.
Melson, G. F., Kahn, P. H., Beck, A., Friedman, B., Roberts, T., Garrett, E., & Gill, B. T. (2009). Children’s behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 92–102.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
Mixed reality. (2023, July 22). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_reality
Mollen, J., Van Der Putten, P., & Darling, K. (2023). Bonding with a Couchsurfing Robot: The Impact of Common Locus on Human-Robot Bonding In-the-Wild. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 12(1), 1-33.
O′Rourke, A. (1998). Caring about virtual pets: an ethical interpretation of Tamagotchi. Animal Issues, 2(1), 1.
Ostrowski, A. K., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2022). Mixed-Method Long-Term Robot Usage: Older Adults′ Lived Experience of Social Robots. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 33-42.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.
Ramachandran, A., Huang, C. M., & Scassellati, B. (2017). Give me a break! Personalized timing strategies to promote learning in robot-child tutoring. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 146-155).
Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PloS one, 8(8), e71182.
Riedmann, A., Schaper, P., & Lugrin, B. (2022). Integration of a social robot and gamification in adult learning and effects on motivation, engagement and performance. AI & SOCIETY, 1-20.
Robotic pet. (2023, July 4). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotic_pet
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents′ achievement and peer relationships: the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological bulletin, 134(2), 223.
Salomons, N., Pineda, K. T., Adéjàre, A., & Scassellati, B. (2022). “We Make a Great Team!”: Adults with Low Prior Domain Knowledge Learn more from a Peer Robot than a Tutor Robot. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 176-184.
Shimizu, I., Kikukawa, M., Tada, T., Kimura, T., Duvivier, R., & Van Der Vleuten, C. (2020). Measuring social interdependence in collaborative learning: instrument development and validation. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-9.
Shin, D. (2019). How does immersion work in augmented reality games? A user-centric view of immersion and engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1212-1229.
Socratous, C., & Ioannou, A. (2022). Evaluating the impact of the curriculum structure on group metacognition during collaborative problem-solving using educational robotics. TechTrends, 66(5), 771-783.
Taing, M. U., Smith, T., Singla, N., Johnson, R. E., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The relationship between learning goal orientation, goal setting, and performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1668-1675.
Tamagotchi. (2023, July 25). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamagotchi
Usán, P., Salavera, C., & Teruel, P. (2019). School motivation, goal orientation and academic performance in secondary education students. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 877-887.
Van Minkelen, P., Gruson, C., Van Hees, P., Willems, M., De Wit, J., Aarts, R., ... & Vogt, P. (2020). Using self-determination theory in social robots to increase motivation in L2 word learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 369-377.
Vicedo, M. (2014). Attachment. Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, 136–141.
Wei, M., Russell, D. W., & Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclosure, loneliness, and subsequent depression for freshman college students: A longitudinal study. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(4), 602.
Winefield, H. R., Black, A., & Chur-Hansen, A. (2008). Health effects of ownership of and attachment to companion animals in an older population. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(4).
Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2011). An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 345-357.
指導教授 陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen) 審核日期 2023-8-10
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明