數位與永續雙軸能力量表開發與案例分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：28

、訪客IP：18.191.174.168

姓名

許駿暉(Chun-Hui Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

數位與永續雙軸能力量表開發與案例分析
(Development and case study of digital and sustainability competence scale)

相關論文

★ 美國軟體產業創新活動與財務效率分析	★ Performance Measurements of Web 2.0, Social Media, and Mobile Apps for Municipal Emergency Management
★ 中國大陸股權結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性	★ 我國半導體產業下游公司法人說明會對供應鏈上游公司投資現金流量敏感度的影響
★ 線上串流音樂服務之使用者抗拒意圖研究	★ 從認知理論探討創業機會辨識對績效之影響
★ 影響Y世代消費者對智慧綠色產品購買意圖與使用意圖的因素：以智慧節能裝置為例	★ Application of social media mining on the comparison between two-dimensional barcode and near field communication
★ 應用社群探勘技術分析城市之創業精神與新創公司的特性	★ 科技接受度與學習風格對於頭戴式虛擬實境應用在學習行為意圖的影響
★ 電子發票巨量資料視覺化分析－以酒的消費為例	★ 應用文字探勘分析ERP之趨勢發展：以Twitter為例
★ 社群媒體文字採礦之研究：以第三方物流公司為例	★ 應用文字探勘技術分析遊戲產業趨勢：以兩大遊戲展之相關推文為例
★ 台灣有機食品消費與疾病死亡率之視覺化分析	★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-10-18以後開放)

摘要(中)

邇來隨著數位轉型與永續發展浪潮遽然興起，歐盟提出了一個新概念，即「雙軸轉型」。是故，為使社會面與經濟面能夠齊順轉型之步伐，亟需優秀之雙軸轉型人才。強調人才在轉型過程中，應同時關注其數位能力和永續能力。然而，在目前的研究中，尚未有相關的評估量表存在。
本研究主要目的是開發一套量化的雙軸能力量表，並進行實證案例分析。此量表結合數位能力和永續能力，並依據國際架構制定，如英國數位建設中心數位能力框架和歐盟永續發展能力框架。數位能力包括資料基礎知識、資料生命週期與品質管理、資料建模、資料分析與智慧、經驗與應用、資訊安全與道德能力;永續能力包括體現永續價值觀、擁抱永續複雜性、展望永續未來、為永續發展行動。研究經過信、效度分析確認量表的可應用性後，吾人對國內某大學的研究生進行實證案例分析，並延伸至人口統計變項的關聯性探討。透過隨機分層抽樣，共獲得 260 份有效問卷。
吾人使用數位能力與永續能力的因素分數進行主成分分析。透過此分析建立新的主成分變數以綜合原本的因素。最終的分析結果呈現出兩個主成分，分別稱為 Factor1 和 Factor2，這兩個主成分成功地涵蓋原始數據中的所有變異，透過這兩個成分相加，得到了雙軸能力的綜合分數。結果顯示，性別對雙軸能力並無顯著影響，而學群背景和部分 MBTI 人格特質可能在特定能力上產生差異。特別的是，實習經驗與永續能力和雙軸能力呈正向關聯。憑此調查結果，深入了解我國高等教育市場中雙軸人才的能力程度分佈。
本研究不僅開闢雙軸人才評估的新視野，也為追求創新和永續發展的組織提供了實用工具和策略，助力他們進行雙軸轉型，增強競爭力，並為全球新挑戰和機遇做好準備。

摘要(英)

Recently, with the rise of the wave of digital transformation and sustainable development, the European Union has put forth a new concept, namely "Twin transformation." Hence, in order to facilitate a smooth transformation in both social and economic aspects, there is an urgent need for outstanding twin transformation talents. The emphasis is on talents who, during the transformation process, should focus simultaneously on their digital and sustainability competence. However, no relevant evaluation scale exists in current research.
The primary purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative twin transformation competence scale and conduct empirical case study. This scale combines digital competence and sustainability competence and is formulated based on international frameworks, such as the Centre for Digital Built Britain’s digital competence framework and the European Union′s sustainability competence framework.
Digital competence includes Data Fundamentals, Lifecycle Assurance & Quality Management, Data Modeling, Analytics & Intelligence, Experience & Application, and Security & Ethics. Sustainable competence includes Embodying Sustainability Values, Embracing Complexity in Sustainability, Envisioning Sustainable, and Acting for Sustainability. After the study′s validity and reliability analysis confirmed the applicability of the scale, we conducted empirical case study on graduate students at a domestic university and extended to the correlational study of demographic variables. Through random stratified sampling, a total of 260 valid questionnaires were obtained.
We used the factor scores of digital competence and sustainability competence to perform principal component analysis. Through this analysis, new principal component variables were established to synthesize the original factors. The final analysis revealed two principal components, named Factor1 and Factor2, covering all the variations in the original data. By adding these two components, a composite score for twin transformation competence was obtained. The results showed that gender did not significantly affect twin transformation competence, while academic background and some MBTI personality traits might cause differences in specific competences. Notably, internship experience had a positive correlation with sustainable capability and twin transformation competence. Based on these survey results, we gained a deeper understanding of the distribution of twin transformation talents′ competences in our country′s higher education market.
This research not only opens up new horizons for the evaluation of twin transformation talents but also provides practical tools and strategies for organizations pursuing innovation and sustainable development. It empowers them to undertake twin transformation, enhance competitiveness, and prepare for global new challenges and opportunities.

關鍵字(中)

★ 雙軸轉型
★ 數位能力
★ 永續能力
★ 量表開發
★ MBTI

關鍵字(英)

★ Twin transformation
★ Digital competence
★ Sustainability competence
★ Scale development
★ MBTI

論文目次

中文摘要 .............................................................................................. ii
ABSTRACT .......................................................................................iii
致謝 ...................................................................................................... v
目錄 ..................................................................................................... vi
圖目錄 ...............................................................................................viii
表目錄 ................................................................................................. ix
第一章緒論......................................................................................11
1-1 研究背景與動機 ............................................................................................ 11
1-2 研究目的 ........................................................................................................ 12
1-3 論文結構 ........................................................................................................ 13
第二章文獻探討..............................................................................14
2-1 數位能力 ........................................................................................................ 14
2-2 永續能力 ........................................................................................................ 16
2-3 數位與永續雙軸 ............................................................................................ 19
第三章量表開發..............................................................................22
3-1
3-2
數位能力量表 ................................................................................................ 22
3-1-1 數位能力量表採用框架 .................................................................... 22
3-1-2 數位能力量表問項設計 .................................................................... 24
永續能力量表 ................................................................................................ 25
3-2-1 永續能力量表採用框架 .................................................................... 25
3-2-2 永續能力量表問項設計 .................................................................... 28
3-3 雙軸能力與等級尺度 .................................................................................... 30
3-4 雙軸能力分數計算方法 ................................................................................ 32
第四章案例分析..............................................................................34
4-1 4-2
4-3 4-4
4-5
受訪者基本資料 ............................................................................................ 34
能力指標分析 ................................................................................................ 36
4-2-1 數位能力指標分析 ............................................................................ 36
4-2-2 永續能力指標分析 ............................................................................ 39
因素分析效度與信度檢測 ............................................................................ 43
數位永續雙軸能力綜合分析 ........................................................................ 50
4-4-1 因素評分之計算 ................................................................................ 50
4-4-2 主成分分析 ........................................................................................ 52
數位與永續雙軸能力之單因子檢定 ............................................................ 55
4-5-1 性別 .................................................................................................... 55
4-5-2 學群 .................................................................................................... 56
4-5-3 實習經驗 ............................................................................................ 58
4-5-4 MBTI 人格特質_態度(Attitudes): .................................................. 59
4-5-5 MBTI 人格特質_感知(Perceiving): ............................................. 60
4-5-6 MBTI 人格特質_判斷(Judging): .................................................... 61
4-5-7 MBTI 人格特質-生活方式(Lifestyle): ........................................... 62
第五章結論與建議..........................................................................65
5-1 研究結論與實務意涵 .................................................................................... 65
5-2 研究限制及未來研究 .................................................................................... 66
參考資料 ............................................................................................ 67

參考文獻

BAYRAKCI, S., & NARMANLIOĞLU, H. (2021). Digital literacy as whole of digital competences: Scale development study. Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(4), 1-30.
Bejaković, P., & Mrnjavac, Ž. (2020). The importance of digital literacy on the labour market. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(4), 921-932.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, 17-66.
Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., . . . Jarchow, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16, 13-29.
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens.
Chatzistamoulou, N. (2023). Is digital transformation the Deus ex Machina towards sustainability transition of the European SMEs? Ecological Economics, 206, 107739.
DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 14(1), 20.
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business strategy and the environment, 26(5), 597-608.
Faivre, C., Rückert, D., Veugelers, R., & Weiss, C. T. (2023). The Green and Digital Twin Transition: EU vs US Firms. Intereconomics, 2023(1), 56-62.
Fastré, G. M., Van der Klink, M. R., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Towards an integrated model for developing sustainable assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 611-630.
Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. In: Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg.
Frankiewicz, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2020). Digital transformation is about talent, not technology. Harvard Business Review, 6(3), 1-6.
Graf-Drasch, V., Kauffeld, L., Kempf, L., Oberländer, A. M., & Teuchert, A. (2023). DRIVING TWIN TRANSFORMATION-THE INTERPLAY OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND SUSTAINABILITY TRANSFORMATION.
Graph, L. E. (2022). Global Green Skills Report. https://economicgraph. linkedin. com/. Guia, B., Ulrike, P., & Marcelino, C. G. (2022). GreenComp The European sustainability
competence framework. Retrieved from
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
Henderson, T. S., Michel, J. O., Bryan, A., Canosa, E., Gamalski, C., Jones, K., & Moghtader, J.
(2022). An exploration of the relationship between sustainability-related
involvement and learning in higher education. Sustainability, 14(9), 5506. Holdgate, M. W. (1987). Our Common Future: The Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York: xv+ 347+ 35 pp., 20.25× 13.25× 1.75 cm, Oxford Paperback,£ 5.95 net in UK, 1987.
Environmental Conservation, 14(3), 282-282.
Jessup, C. M. (2002). Applying psychological type and “gifts differing” to organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(5), 502-511.
Jurmu, M., Niskanen, I., Kinnula, A., Kääriäinen, J., Ylikerälä, M., Räsänen, P., & Tuikka, T. (2023). Exploring the Role of Federated Data Spaces in Implementing Twin Transition within Manufacturing Ecosystems. Sensors, 23(9), 4315.
Khaw, T. Y., Teoh, A. P., Abdul Khalid, S. N., & Letchmunan, S. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on sustainable performance: a systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development, 41(9/10), 514-534. doi:10.1108/JMD-03-2022-0070
Lacy, P., Arnott, J., & Lowitt, E. (2009). The challenge of integrating sustainability into talent and organization strategies: investing in the knowledge, skills and attitudes to achieve high performance. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 9(4), 484-494.
Muench, S., Stoermer, E., Jensen, K., Asikainen, T., Salvi, M., & Scapolo, F. (2022). Towards a green & digital future.
Ogbeibu, S., Emelifeonwu, J., Pereira, V., Oseghale, R., Gaskin, J., Sivarajah, U., & Gunasekaran, A. (2023). Demystifying the roles of organisational smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics and algorithms capability: A strategy for green human resource management and environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment.
Ollagnier, J.-M. (2021). The European Double Up: A twin strategy that will strengthen competitiveness.
Park, Y. (2020). IEEE standard for digital intelligence (DQ)–Framework for digital literacy, skills, and readiness. In: IEEE.
Peart, M. T., Gutiérrez-Esteban, P., & Cubo-Delgado, S. (2020). Development of the digital and socio-civic skills (DIGISOC) questionnaire. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3327-3351.
Piroșcă, G. I., Șerban-Oprescu, G. L., Badea, L., Stanef-Puică, M.-R., & Valdebenito, C. R. (2021). Digitalization and labor market—A perspective within the framework of pandemic crisis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 2843-2857.
Plummer, D., Kearney, S., Monagle, A., Collins, H., Perry, V., Moulds, A., . . . Trewavas, S. (2021). Skills and competency framework-supporting the development and adoption of the information management framework (imf) and the national digital twin.
Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021). Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education.
Rice, K., Schutte, N. S., Cosh, S. M., Rock, A. J., Banner, S. E., & Sheen, J. (2022). The Utility and Development of the Competencies of Professional Psychology Rating Scales (COPPR). Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education.
Salavisa, I., & Ferreiro, M. d. F. (2020). Business model innovation and transition to a sustainable food system: A case study in the Lisbon metropolitan area. Knowledge, People, and Digital Transformation: Approaches for a Sustainable Future, 69-84.
Santoalha, A., Consoli, D., & Castellacci, F. (2021). Digital skills, relatedness and green diversification: A study of European regions. Research Policy, 50(9), 104340.
Setyaningrum, R., & Muafi, M. (2023). Green human resource management, green supply chain management, green lifestyle: Their effect on business sustainability mediated by digital skills. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 16(1), 1-26.
Sousa, M. J., & Wilks, D. (2018). Sustainable skills for the world of work in the digital age.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(4), 399-405.
Tang, D. (2021). What is digital transformation? EDPACS, 64(1), 9-13.
Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2018). 21st-century digital
skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and
empirical validation. Telematics and informatics, 35(8), 2184-2200.
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Gomez, S. C., & Van Den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model.
Retrieved from
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a
reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability science, 6, 203-218.

指導教授

沈建文(Chien-Wen Shen)

審核日期

2024-1-11

推文