摘要(英) |
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) proposed by the United Nations in 2015 play a significant role in the global advancement of sustainable development, with businesses serving as a crucial component. In response to this global agenda, businesses need to integrate sustainability concepts with their operational strategies to achieve a balance between environmental protection, social welfare, and economic growth. As global attention to sustainable development increases, businesses are increasingly recognizing that achieving the SDGs is not only a social responsibility but also key to enhancing their influence, competitiveness, and creating long-term value. However, only a few businesses have truly integrated the SDGs into their core operations, and there is a risk of "impact washing" in the absence of standardized tools. The United Nations′ "Sustainable Development Goals Corporate Impact Standards" provide a comprehensive framework to help businesses concretely implement the SDGs and assess their strategies, management, transparency, and governance. This study utilizes this tool to objectively measure how businesses incorporate sustainable goals into their management systems and decision-making practices, by evaluating 12 corporate actions under four main themes of "Strategy," "Management Approach," "Transparency," and "Governance." The study also identifies gaps in impact where concrete action plans are lacking and proposes improvement solutions. Focusing on the application of standardized impact management tools, this study assists in objectively assessing corporate influence. This study found that businesses are overly focused on financial outcomes and lack a long-term perspective on sustainable strategies, leading to inadequate investment in long-term social welfare and environmental responsibility, and overlooking the comprehensiveness of sustainable development. Additionally, companies only consider sustainable measures under external regulatory pressure, lacking intrinsic motivation for sustainability. The absence of effective management tools for setting and measuring sustainability goals, and the lack of experienced personnel to lead and implement sustainable strategies, hinder deep engagement and effective practice in SDGs. Therefore, it is recommended to introduce SROI impact assessment tools and adopt internationally recognized classification standards, like ABC impact classification, to enhance open communication and transparency, build trust among stakeholders, collaborate with third-party experts, regularly review and adjust sustainability strategies, objectively assess and continually improve sustainable practices to ensure comprehensive implementation of SDGs. This study focuses on the application of standardized impact management tools to assist in objectively assessing corporate influence. Through case analysis, it delves into the effectiveness of these tools in practical application and identifies areas for improvement in SDGs practice by businesses. The aim is to provide clearer direction for companies. By using standardized tools, a consistent set of assessment metrics and frameworks are provided to uniformly measure and report the impact of businesses on society and the environment. This enhances the transparency and comparability of corporate impact assessments, promoting progress in sustainable development and facilitating positive social and environmental change. |
參考文獻 |
一、英文文獻:
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2008). Stakeholder Marketing: Beyond the Four Ps and the Customer. Journal of public policy & marketing, 27(1), 113-116.
Clark, C., & Rosenzweig, W. (2004). Double bottom line project report. University of California, Berkeley.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: a European perspective; managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don′t Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here. Academy of Management perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory : the state of the art / R. Edward Freeman. Cambridge University Press.
Grieco, C., Michelini, L., & Iasevoli, G. (2015). Measuring Value Creation in Social Enterprises: A Cluster Analysis of Social Impact Assessment Models. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 44(6), 1173-1193.
Hart, S. L., Mark, B. M., & Joseph, C. (2003). Creating Sustainable Value [and Executive Commentary]. The Academy of Management executive (1993), 17(2), 56-69.
Hazenberg, R., & Paterson-Young, C. (2022). Social impact measurement for a sustainable future : the power of aesthetics and practical implications / edited by Richard Hazenberg, Claire Paterson-Young. Palgrave Macmillan.
Huse, M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation : The Human Side of Corporate Governance. [electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press.
Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2000). A handbook for value chain research (Vol. 113). University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies Brighton.
Lashitew, A. A. (2021). Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change? Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 184-200.
Lingane, A., & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for Social Return on Investment. California management review, 46(3), 116-135.
Mamingi, N., & Barbados, W. (2011). Enterprise and Sustainable Development: Role, Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2(11&12), 16-26.
Mezinova, I., Balanova, M., Bodiagin, O., Israilova, E., & Nazarova, E. (2022). Do Creators of New Markets Meet SDGs? Analysis of Platform Companies. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(2), 674.
Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement: The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public management review, 15(6), 923-941.
Nicholls, A. (2009). ‘We do good things, don’t we?’: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 755-769.
Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a Great Gift to Business. Procedia CIRP, 69, 21-24.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). CREATING SHARED VALUE [Article]. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
Richards, A. (2023). Measuring and Managing Social Value: Myths and Opportunities. In (33-56). Springer International Publishing.
Sachs, J. (2015). The age of sustainable development / Jeffrey D. Sachs ; [foreword by Ban Ki-Moon]. Columbia University Press.
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-19.
Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The Private Sector and the SDGs: The Need to Move Beyond ‘Business as Usual’. Sustainable Development, 24(6), 371-382.
Sumit Lodhia, A. K., Sanjaya Chinthana Kuruppu. (2023). The disclosure of sustainable development goals (SDGs) by the top 50 Australian companies: substantive or symbolic legitimation? Meditari accountancy research.
Tureac, C. E., Turtureanu, A. G., Bordean, I., & Modiga, G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 5(1).
van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2021). Improving companies′ impacts on sustainable development: A nexus approach to the SDGS. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3703-3720.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319.
二、網路資料
SDG Impact Self-Assessment Tool for Enterprises. (2022). https://sdgimpact.undp.org/enterprise.html
SDG Impact Standards for Enterprises. (2022). https://sdgimpact.undp.org/enterprise.html |