博碩士論文 110451014 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:39 、訪客IP:3.149.26.246
姓名 許嘉倩(Hsu-Chia Chien)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 聯合國永續發展目標企業影響力標準應用與個案分析
(Application of the UNDP SDGs Impact Standards for Enterprises and Case Analysis)
相關論文
★ 美國軟體產業創新活動與財務效率分析★ Performance Measurements of Web 2.0, Social Media, and Mobile Apps for Municipal Emergency Management
★ 中國大陸股權結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性★ 我國半導體產業下游公司法人說明會對供應鏈上游公司投資現金流量敏感度的影響
★ 線上串流音樂服務之使用者抗拒意圖研究★ 從認知理論探討創業機會辨識對績效之影響
★ 影響Y世代消費者對智慧綠色產品購買意圖與使用意圖的因素:以智慧節能裝置為例★ Application of social media mining on the comparison between two-dimensional barcode and near field communication
★ 應用社群探勘技術分析城市之創業精神與新創公司的特性★ 科技接受度與學習風格對於頭戴式虛擬實境應用在學習行為意圖的影響
★ 電子發票巨量資料視覺化分析-以酒的消費為例★ 應用文字探勘分析ERP之趨勢發展:以Twitter為例
★ 社群媒體文字採礦之研究:以第三方物流公司為例★ 應用文字探勘技術分析遊戲產業趨勢:以兩大遊戲展之相關推文為例
★ 台灣有機食品消費與疾病死亡率之視覺化分析★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-2-1以後開放)
摘要(中) 聯合國在2015年提出的永續發展目標(SDGs),隨著全球永續發展目標的推進,企業扮演著重要的角色,為了響應這一全球性議程,企業需要將永續理念與實際經營策略結合,以實現環境保護、社會福祉與經濟增長的平衡。隨著全球對永續發展的關注日益增加,企業逐漸認識到實現SDGs不僅是社會責任,更是提升影響力、增加競爭力及創造長期價值的關鍵;然而,真正將SDGs融入核心業務的企業仍屬少數,且在缺乏標準化工具的情況下,存在「影響力漂白」的風險。聯合國《永續發展目標企業影響力標準》提供了一套全面的框架,幫助企業具體實踐SDGs,並評估其策略、管理、透明度及治理的實踐程度。本研究應用此工具,透過評估工具在「策略」、「管理方法」、「透明度」及「治理」四大主題項下展開之12項企業行動,客觀衡量企業如何將永續目標融入管理系統與決策實踐中,並針對尚未有完善實際行動方案之影響力缺口,提出改善建議方案。本研究發現企業面臨財務導向過強及缺乏永續策略的長遠視角,企業傾向於短期財務成果,對長期的社會福祉及環境責任投資的不足,忽視了永續發展的全面性;又企業僅在外部法規壓力下才考慮採取永續措施,缺少永續文化的內驅力;且企業缺乏有效的管理工具來制定和衡量永續發展的目標,以及缺乏有經驗的人才來帶領和實施永續策略,這些問題影響企業在SDGs方面的深度參與及有效實踐。因此建議可導入SROI之影響力評估工具及採納國際認可的分類標準,如ABC影響力分類,增進公開溝通與透明度,促進利害關係人間的信任建立,並與第三方專家合作,定期檢視與調整永續策略,客觀評估和持續改進其永續實踐,以確保永續發展目標的全面實施。本研究著重於標準化影響力管理工具的應用,協助客觀評估企業影響力,透過個案分析,深入探討此工具在實際應用中的成效,並提出了企業在SDGs實踐上的不足及改進策略,期望能為企業提供更明確的方向;藉由標準化工具來提供一致的評估指標和框架,以統一方式衡量和報告企業對社會、環境的影響,進而助於提高企業影響力評估的透明度和可比性,促進企業在永續發展上的進步,藉此推動社會和環境的正面改變。
摘要(英) The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) proposed by the United Nations in 2015 play a significant role in the global advancement of sustainable development, with businesses serving as a crucial component. In response to this global agenda, businesses need to integrate sustainability concepts with their operational strategies to achieve a balance between environmental protection, social welfare, and economic growth. As global attention to sustainable development increases, businesses are increasingly recognizing that achieving the SDGs is not only a social responsibility but also key to enhancing their influence, competitiveness, and creating long-term value. However, only a few businesses have truly integrated the SDGs into their core operations, and there is a risk of "impact washing" in the absence of standardized tools. The United Nations′ "Sustainable Development Goals Corporate Impact Standards" provide a comprehensive framework to help businesses concretely implement the SDGs and assess their strategies, management, transparency, and governance. This study utilizes this tool to objectively measure how businesses incorporate sustainable goals into their management systems and decision-making practices, by evaluating 12 corporate actions under four main themes of "Strategy," "Management Approach," "Transparency," and "Governance." The study also identifies gaps in impact where concrete action plans are lacking and proposes improvement solutions. Focusing on the application of standardized impact management tools, this study assists in objectively assessing corporate influence. This study found that businesses are overly focused on financial outcomes and lack a long-term perspective on sustainable strategies, leading to inadequate investment in long-term social welfare and environmental responsibility, and overlooking the comprehensiveness of sustainable development. Additionally, companies only consider sustainable measures under external regulatory pressure, lacking intrinsic motivation for sustainability. The absence of effective management tools for setting and measuring sustainability goals, and the lack of experienced personnel to lead and implement sustainable strategies, hinder deep engagement and effective practice in SDGs. Therefore, it is recommended to introduce SROI impact assessment tools and adopt internationally recognized classification standards, like ABC impact classification, to enhance open communication and transparency, build trust among stakeholders, collaborate with third-party experts, regularly review and adjust sustainability strategies, objectively assess and continually improve sustainable practices to ensure comprehensive implementation of SDGs. This study focuses on the application of standardized impact management tools to assist in objectively assessing corporate influence. Through case analysis, it delves into the effectiveness of these tools in practical application and identifies areas for improvement in SDGs practice by businesses. The aim is to provide clearer direction for companies. By using standardized tools, a consistent set of assessment metrics and frameworks are provided to uniformly measure and report the impact of businesses on society and the environment. This enhances the transparency and comparability of corporate impact assessments, promoting progress in sustainable development and facilitating positive social and environmental change.
關鍵字(中) ★ SDGs
★ 永續發展目標
★ 影響力衡量
★ 影響力管理
★ 影響力缺口分析
關鍵字(英) ★ SDGs
★ Sustainable Development Goals
★ Impact measurement
★ Impact Management
★ Impact Gap Analysis
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract iii
致謝 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 xi
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1 永續發展目標對企業的影響 4
2.2 影響力測量與管理對永續發展目標的重要性 6
第三章 研究方法 10
3.1永續發展目標企業影響力標準(SDG Impact Standards For Enterprises ) 10
3.2永續發展目標企業影響力標準之自我評估 12
3.2.1 策略影響力標準自我評估 13
3.2.2 管理方法影響力標準自我評估 15
3.2.3 透明度影響力標準自我評估 17
3.2.4 治理影響力標準自我評估 18
第四章 實證研究 20
4.1 研究對象 20
4.2 策略 21
4-2-1 策略企業行動1 21
4-2-2 策略企業行動2 24
4-2-3 策略企業行動3 27
4-2-4 策略企業行動4 30
4-2-5 策略企業行動5 33
4.3 管理方法 35
4-3-1 管理方法企業行動1 35
4-3-2 管理方法企業行動2 39
4-3-3 管理方法企業行動3 47
4-3-4 管理方法企業行動4 49
4.4 透明度 51
4-4-1 透明度企業行動 51
4.5 治理 55
4-5-1 治理企業行動1 55
4-5-2 治理企業行動2 59
4-6 實踐指標自我評估問項結果之缺口分析 61
4-6-1 管理方法面缺口分析 63
4-6-2 策略面缺口分析 66
4-6-3 治理面缺口分析 67
4-6-4 透明度面缺口分析 68
第五章 研究結論與建議 70
參考文獻 73
參考文獻 一、英文文獻:
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2008). Stakeholder Marketing: Beyond the Four Ps and the Customer. Journal of public policy & marketing, 27(1), 113-116.

Clark, C., & Rosenzweig, W. (2004). Double bottom line project report. University of California, Berkeley.

Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: a European perspective; managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.

Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don′t Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here. Academy of Management perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory : the state of the art / R. Edward Freeman. Cambridge University Press.

Grieco, C., Michelini, L., & Iasevoli, G. (2015). Measuring Value Creation in Social Enterprises: A Cluster Analysis of Social Impact Assessment Models. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 44(6), 1173-1193.

Hart, S. L., Mark, B. M., & Joseph, C. (2003). Creating Sustainable Value [and Executive Commentary]. The Academy of Management executive (1993), 17(2), 56-69.

Hazenberg, R., & Paterson-Young, C. (2022). Social impact measurement for a sustainable future : the power of aesthetics and practical implications / edited by Richard Hazenberg, Claire Paterson-Young. Palgrave Macmillan.

Huse, M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation : The Human Side of Corporate Governance. [electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press.

Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2000). A handbook for value chain research (Vol. 113). University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies Brighton.

Lashitew, A. A. (2021). Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change? Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 184-200.

Lingane, A., & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for Social Return on Investment. California management review, 46(3), 116-135.

Mamingi, N., & Barbados, W. (2011). Enterprise and Sustainable Development: Role, Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2(11&12), 16-26.

Mezinova, I., Balanova, M., Bodiagin, O., Israilova, E., & Nazarova, E. (2022). Do Creators of New Markets Meet SDGs? Analysis of Platform Companies. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(2), 674.

Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement: The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public management review, 15(6), 923-941.

Nicholls, A. (2009). ‘We do good things, don’t we?’: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 755-769.

Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a Great Gift to Business. Procedia CIRP, 69, 21-24.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). CREATING SHARED VALUE [Article]. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

Richards, A. (2023). Measuring and Managing Social Value: Myths and Opportunities. In (33-56). Springer International Publishing.

Sachs, J. (2015). The age of sustainable development / Jeffrey D. Sachs ; [foreword by Ban Ki-Moon]. Columbia University Press.

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1-19.

Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The Private Sector and the SDGs: The Need to Move Beyond ‘Business as Usual’. Sustainable Development, 24(6), 371-382.

Sumit Lodhia, A. K., Sanjaya Chinthana Kuruppu. (2023). The disclosure of sustainable development goals (SDGs) by the top 50 Australian companies: substantive or symbolic legitimation? Meditari accountancy research.

Tureac, C. E., Turtureanu, A. G., Bordean, I., & Modiga, G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 5(1).

van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2021). Improving companies′ impacts on sustainable development: A nexus approach to the SDGS. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3703-3720.

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319.

二、網路資料
SDG Impact Self-Assessment Tool for Enterprises. (2022). https://sdgimpact.undp.org/enterprise.html

SDG Impact Standards for Enterprises. (2022). https://sdgimpact.undp.org/enterprise.html
指導教授 沈建文 審核日期 2024-1-24
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明