博碩士論文 110421004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:23 、訪客IP:3.144.9.141
姓名 楊承鑫(Chen-Hsin Yang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 電子產業進行ERP系統轉換之個案研究:科技接受與組織變革的觀點
(A Case Study of Upgrading ERP System: Perspective of Technology Adoption and Organizational Change)
相關論文
★ 企業流程為核心的食品產業運籌體系規劃:低溫物流部份★ 以企業流程方法規劃整體飛航後勤維修體系之研究
★ 成衣產業導入ERP運籌管理方案之個案研究★ 光電產業試產基地之生產最佳化模式:以光投影機為例
★ TFT LCD產業獲利因素之探討★ 科技事業進行合併/讓售之決策過程與成效之個案探討
★ 企業治理、風險及遵循解決方案導入之個案研究-以職責分離資訊系統為例★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用
★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析
★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響★ 電子產業新產品開發參考模式之發展
★ 應用資料科學方法提昇國防裝備可靠度之研究-以防空系統為例★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-1-12以後開放)
摘要(中) 隨著科技發展,企業資源規劃系統 (Enterprise Resource Planning, ERP) 也逐漸發展成熟,ERP系統能夠有效整合流程與資訊,為企業提升生產力。近幾年來,多數企業皆已導入ERP系統,然而隨著企業成長,有些較為小型或功能簡單的ERP系統不再能滿足企業逐漸成長的需求,因此需要進行轉換及升級。在更換系統時,如何降低員工抗拒是重要的議題,因此,本研究以科技接受模型為基礎,並將變革管理作為外部變數,探討公司的變革管理措施對於員工對新ERP系統的認知及行為意圖之影響。
本研究以一家正在進行ERP系統更換專案的電子零件製造公司作為目標個案,以直接參與的方式進行實地觀察,並針對個案範圍內之參與者進行問卷調查,使用基於偏最小平方法的結構方程模式 (PLS-SEM) 進行分析,探討在接受公司組織的變革管理措施後,使用者最終對於新系統的接受度和使用意願是否能提高。
研究結果顯示,當接受變革管理措施後,使用者能知覺系統更加易用,提高知覺易用性後會連帶提升知覺有用性,而提升知覺有用性後會對新ERP系統產生正面的評價及態度,最終產生使用新系統的意願及意圖。
摘要(英) With the advancement of technology, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems have also matured gradually. ERP systems effectively integrate processes and information, enhancing productivity for businesses. In recent years, most companies have adopted ERP systems. However, as businesses grow, some smaller or less sophisticated ERP systems can no longer meet the evolving needs of the company, necessitating a transition and upgrade. When replacing systems, reducing employee resistance is a crucial concern. Therefore, this study is based on the Technology Acceptance Model, with change management as an external variable, to investigate the impact of the company′s change management measures on employees′ perception and behavioral intent towards the new ERP system.
This study focuses on an electronic manufacturing company currently undergoing an ERP system replacement project. It involves on-site observations and a survey of participants within the case scope. The structural equation modeling based on Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM) is employed for analysis to explore whether acceptance and willingness to use the new system can be improved after the implementation of the company′s change management measures.
The research results indicate that after accepting change management measures, users perceive the system as more user-friendly. Increased perceived ease of use is associated with enhanced perceived usefulness, which, in turn, leads to positive evaluations and attitudes towards the new ERP system. Ultimately, this results in the intention and willingness to use the new system.
關鍵字(中) ★ ERP
★ 變革管理
★ 科技接受模型
★ 系統轉換
★ 行為意圖
關鍵字(英) ★ ERP
★ Change Management
★ Technology Acceptance Model
★ System Transition
★ Behavioral Intention
論文目次 摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝辭 iii
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景及動機 1
1.2 研究目的與範圍 2
1.3 研究流程與架構 2
1.3.1 研究流程 2
1.3.2 論文架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 企業資源規劃 (Enterprise Resource Planning, ERP) 5
2.1.1 ERP之定義 5
2.1.2 物料需求計畫系統 (Material Requirements Planning, MRP) 5
2.1.3 製造資源計畫系統 (Manufacturing Resource Planning, MRP II) 5
2.1.4 企業資源規劃系統 (Enterprise Resource Planning, ERP) 6
2.2 科技接受模型 6
2.2.1 科技接受模型的由來: 7
2.2.2 科技接受模型的主要概念 7
2.3 變革管理 9
2.3.1 Lewin的變革管理 9
2.3.2 變革三步驟 10
2.4 SAP導入論ASAP 11
第三章 研究方法 13
3.1 個案研究法 13
3.2 研究進行方式 13
3.3 研究模型假設 14
3.4 統計分析方法 16
3.4.1 結構方程模型 16
第四章 個案公司介紹 17
4.1 個案公司所屬產業及背景 17
4.2 個案公司市場分析與主要產品 18
4.2.1 連接器簡介: 19
4.2.2 連接器的組成要素: 19
4.2.3 連接器的構造 19
4.2.4 連接器的分類: 20
4.3 個案公司組織成長與營運績效 21
4.3.1 個案公司組織成長歷史 21
4.3.2 個案公司營運績效 22
4.4 個案公司系統轉換原因 23
第五章 系統轉換專案流程 24
5.4 高階主管共識與員工溝通 24
5.5 導入專案藍圖規劃 28
5.5.1 專案時程規劃 28
5.5.2 模組流程規劃 30
5.6 教育訓練與實際操作 55
第六章 員工接受度分析 60
6.1 研究問卷發展 60
6.1.1 研究問卷問項與意涵 60
6.1.2 問卷尺度衡量方法 63
6.2 研究問卷發放與蒐集 63
6.3 研究問卷分析 64
6.3.1 敘述性統計分析 64
6.3.2 測量模型分析 68
6.3.3 結構模型分析 72
6.4 研究論述 74
6.4.1 理論意涵 75
6.4.2 管理意涵 75
第七章 結論與限制 76
7.1 研究結論 76
7.2 研究限制與後續研究 77
參考文獻 78
附錄一 A公司教育訓練時程 83
附錄二 研究問卷 85
參考文獻 Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.
Aladwani, A. M. (2001). Change management strategies for successful ERP implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 266-275.
Amid, A., Moalagh, M., & Zare Ravasan, A. (2012). Identification and classification of ERP critical failure factors in Iranian industries. Information Systems, 37(3), 227-237.
Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41(6), 731-745.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Alwabel, S. A., Zairi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (2006). The Evolution of ERP and Its Relationship with E-Business. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 2(4), 58–76.
Back, K. W. (1992). This business of topology. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 51–66.
Bajaj, A., & Nidumolu, S. R. (1998). A feedback model to understand information system usage. Information & Management, 33(4), 213-224.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Barth, C., & Koch, S. (2019). Critical success factors in ERP upgrade projects. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(3), 656-675.
Botta-Genoulaz, V., Millet, P.-A., & Grabot, B. (2005). A Survey on the Recent Literature on ERP Systems. Computers in Industry, 56, 510-522.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the Planned Approach to Change: A Re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 977-1002.
Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Cantrell, S. (2004). Enterprise systems and ongoing process change. Business Process Management Journal, 10(1), 16-26.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research (Vol. 27).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative Methods in Management Research. SAGE Publications.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Holland, C., & Light, B. (1999). A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation. IEEE Software, 16, 30-36.
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91-112.
Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R. A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision sciences, 28(2), 357-389.
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 183-213.
Khoo, H. M., Robey, D., & Rao, S. V. (2011). An Exploratory Study of the Impacts of Upgrading Packaged Software: A Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 26(3), 153-169.
Koh, S. C. L., Gunasekaran, A., & Cooper, J. R. (2009). The demand for training and consultancy investment in SME-specific ERP systems implementation and operation. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 241-254.
Law, C., Chen, C., & Wu, J. (2010). Managing the full ERP life-cycle: Considerations of maintenance and support requirements and IT governance practice as integral elements of the formula for successful ERP adoption. Computers in Industry, 61, 297-308.
Lee, L., Petter, S., Fayard, D., & Robinson, S. (2011). On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(4), 305-328.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K., & Larsen, K. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Technology,12.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
Lewin, K. C. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. McGraw-hill education.
Rerup Schlichter, B., & Kraemmergaard, P. (2010). A comprehensive literature review of the ERP research field over a decade. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23(4), 486-520.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor′s Comments: A Critical Look at the Use of PLS-SEM in "MIS Quarterly". MIS Quarterly, 36(1), iii-xiv.
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.
Ronnenberg, S. K., Graham, M. E., & Mahmoodi, F. (2011). The important role of change management in environmental management system implementation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(6), 631-647.
Ross, J., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise Architecture as Strategy — Creating a Foundation for Business Execution.
Salmeron, J., & López Vargas, C. (2010). A multicriteria approach for risks assessment in ERP maintenance. Journal of Systems and Software, 83, 1941-1953.
Sammon, D., & Adam, F. (2010). Project preparedness and the emergence of implementation problems in ERP projects. Information & Management, 47(1), 1-8.
Sankar, C. S., & Rau, K.-H. (2006). Implementation Strategies for SAP R/3 in a Multinational Organization: Lessons from a Real-World Case Study. Cybertech Publishing.
Santamaría-Sánchez, L., Núñez-Nickel, M., & Gago-Rodríguez, S. (2010). The role played by interdependences in ERP implementations: An empirical analysis of critical factors that minimize elapsed time. Information & Management, 47(2), 87-95.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197-211.
Schein, E. H. (1996). Kurt Lewin′s change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning. Systems practice, 9(1), 27-47.
Soh, C., Sia, S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000). Enterprise Resource Planning: Cultural Fits and Misfits: Is ERP a Universal Solution? Communications of the ACM, 43, 47-51.
Stratman, J. K., & Roth, A. V. (2002). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Competence Constructs: Two-Stage Multi-Item Scale Development and Validation. Decis. Sci., 33, 601-628.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 47-82). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Weick, K. E. (2007). The Generative Properties of Richness. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 14–19.
Yin. (2003). Case study research : design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Zmud, R. W., & Cox, J. F. (1979). The Implementation Process: A Change Approach. MIS Quarterly, 3(2), 35-43.
指導教授 呂俊德(Jun-Der Leu) 審核日期 2024-1-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明