廠商綠色企業社會責任與利潤績效

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：18.224.63.87

姓名

陳思穎(Szu-Ying Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

廠商綠色企業社會責任與利潤績效

相關論文

★ 存在中間財市場下的跨國廠商進入模式選擇	★ 匯率與本國中間財廠商的直接投資決策
★ 網路外部性下的利潤廠商跟共營廠商競爭分析	★ 寡占市場下的自動進口擴張政策分析
★ 寡占廠商成本歧異下之最適產業與貿易政策	★ 雙邊貿易的最適關稅
★ 平行輸入、仿冒與服務品質	★ 經濟成長、消費者信心與銀行風險
★ 網路外部性與最適民營化政策	★ 經濟整合與關稅政策的福利分析
★ 最適民營化政策的相關議題分析	★ 多功能產品跨業效果的經濟分析
★ 出口競爭與廠商的直接投資決策－匯率的考量	★ Drastic or Non-drastic Innovation When Encountering Rivals
★ 存在中間財下的仿冒行為分析	★ 外人直接投資與政府的策略性汙染稅

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討廠商實踐ECSR時，會如何影響自身及對手廠商的產量、市場上價格及利潤，並且我們將對手廠商的反應考慮在內，驗證廠商在重視環境的同時，是否有可能同時使利潤提升。

本論文首先探討獨占廠商模型，當廠商重視ECSR時，產量減少，導致利潤減少。接著，我們分析在雙占市場模型中的廠商進行數量競爭，假設其他條件都不變之下，重視企業社會責任的廠商，產量、利潤一定會減少，但我們發現當兩廠商對環境的關心程度同時提高，減產的同時，利潤反而有可能增加，類似勾結的結果。除此之外，本論文在模型中加入猜測變量，當廠商減產時，猜測對手廠商也會減產，則廠商越重視環境損害時，利潤增加的可能性較低；反之，當廠商減產時，猜測對手廠商會增產，則廠商越重視環境損害時，利潤增加的可能性就越高。接著是，設定廠商從只關心自身生產時所造成的環境損害，轉變為關心整體社會的總環境損害時，當廠商減產時，同樣猜測對手廠商也會減產，則越重視環境損害時，利潤增加的可能性較低，還會低於當廠商只關心自身生產時；反之，當廠商減產時，猜測對手廠商會增產，則廠商越重視環境損害時，利潤增加的可能性越高，且會高於當廠商只關心自身生產時。

摘要(英)

This research investigates the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices on firms′ behavior and their competitors in terms of production output, market prices, and profits. The study employs models for both monopolistic and duopolistic market structures. For monopolistic firms emphasizing CSR, a reduction in production results in decreased profits. In duopoly markets, firms prioritizing CSR experience reductions in production and profits. However, when both firms intensify their environmental concern, a joint reduction in production may lead to increased profits, resembling collusion outcomes.

The study introduces speculative variables, suggesting that competitor reactions influence the likelihood of profit increase for environmentally conscious firms. Additionally, the research explores the transition from firms caring solely about their own environmental impact to considering the overall societal impact. The findings reveal that the likelihood of profit increase when prioritizing environmental concerns is influenced by competitor reactions.

In conclusion, this research offers insights into the nuanced effects of CSR on firms′ strategies and considers the dynamic interactions in different market scenarios. Understanding how firms, while emphasizing social responsibility, navigate market competition and profit dynamics is crucial for informing sustainable business practices.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 綠色市場
★ 寡占市場
★ 環境損害
★ 猜測變量

關鍵字(英)

★ corporate social responsibility
★ green market
★ conjectural variation

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
第1章前言 1
1.1 研究動機與目的 1
1.2 研究方法 3
1.3 論文架構 4
第2章文獻回顧 5
第3章基本模型 9
第4章雙占模型－廠商關心自身造成的環境損害 13
4.1 模型設定 13
4.2 兩廠商產量決策 14
4.3 兩廠商關心環境的程度同時提高 19
第5章廠商關心整體環境損害 22
5.1 模型設定 22
5.2 兩廠商關心環境的程度同時提高 27
第6章結論與建議 30
6.1 結論 30
6.2 建議 31
參考文獻 32

參考文獻

Baron, D. P. (2001), "Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy," Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7-45.

Baron, D. P. (2009), "A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7-43.

Bowen, H. R. (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper and Row.

Carroll, A. B. (1979), "A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance." Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.

Cornell, B. and Shapiro, A. (1987), "Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance, " Financal Management, 16, 5-14.

Conrad, K. (2001), "Voluntary Environmental Agreements vs. Emission Taxes in Strategic Trade Models," Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 361-381.

Davis, K. (1960), "Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?" California Management Review, 2, 70-76.

Doni, N. and Ricchiuti, G. (2013), "Market Equilibrium in the Presence of Green Consumers and Responsible Firms: A Comparative Statics Analysis, " Resource and Energy Economics, 35(3), 380-395.

Friedman, M. (1970), "The Social Responsibility of Firms is to Increase its Profits," New York Times Magazine. September 13.

Hart, S. L. and Ahuja, G. (1996), "Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.

Hayek, R. (1960), "Social Responsibility of Business Manager." Academy of Management Journal, 7(1), 135-143.

Hwang, H. and Mai, C. C. (1988), "On the Equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas under Duopoly: A Conjectural Variation Approach, " Journal of International Economics, 24, 373-380.

Jinji, N. (2013), "Is Corporate Environmentalism Good for Domestic Welfare? " Review of International Economics, 21(5), 901-911.

Maxwell, J. W., Lyon, T. P., and Hackett, S. C. (2000), "Self-regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism," Journal of Law and Economics, 583-617.

Lyon, T. P. and Maxwell, J. W. (2008), "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective, " Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 240-260.

Lutz, S., Lyon, T. P., and Maxwell, J. W. (2000), "Quality Leadership When Regulatory Standards are Forthcoming," Journal of Industrial Economics, 331-348.

Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B. (1977), "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony," American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.

Moskowitz, M. (1972), "Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks," Business and Society, 1, 71-75.

Sheldon, O. (1924), The Social Responsibility of Management The Philosophy of Management, London, UK: Isaac Pitman and Sons.

Solomon, R. C. and Hanson, K. R. (1986), "It′s good business ? " Perennial Library.

Tsai, T. H. and Chiou, J. R. (2022), "Strategic and Altruistic Corporate Environmental Responsibility in a Green Market " Academia Economic Papers, forthcoming.

Waddock, S. and Graves, S. (1997), "The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, 18, 4, 303-319.

指導教授

邱俊榮(Jiunn-Rong Chiou)

審核日期

2024-1-30

推文