https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/315 Search the Channel s https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/simple-search https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/111341 title: 以層級分析法評估房屋檢測項目與權重之研究;A Study on the Evaluation of Housing Inspection Items and Their Weights Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process abstract: 隨著住宅品質意識提升及購屋風險觀念增加，新成屋交屋前之檢測需求日益受到重視。近年第三方驗屋服務逐漸普及，惟現行作業多依賴檢測人員之實務經驗，缺乏系統化與量化之重要性評估機制，致使檢測流程、時間與資源配置不易形成一致標準。基於此，本研究以新成屋檢測項目為研究對象，運用層級分析法（Analytic Hierarchy Process， AHP）建立檢測項目之重要性評估架構，探討各檢測構面與準則之相對權重及優先順序。 本研究透過文獻回顧及實務檢測內容整理，建構「建築土建系統」、「設備與構件系統」、「給排水與防水系統」、「電氣與通訊系統」及「環境檢測系統」五大構面，共20項檢測準則。研究對象為具新成屋檢測、住宅工程、施工管理、設計監造及室內裝修等相關經驗之專業人士，共取得29份有效問卷，並以Expert Choice軟體進行權重計算及一致性檢定。 研究結果顯示，五大構面以給排水與防水系統權重最高（0.3298），其次依序為建築土建系統（0.2743）、電氣與通訊系統（0.1816）、設備與構件系統（0.1512）及環境檢測系統（0.0632）。跨構面整體權重排序前十項主要集中於排水功能、滲漏水、施工品質及用電安全，顯示新成屋品質風險主要聚焦於水密性、土建施工品質與電氣安全。 本研究將驗屋項目由經驗性判斷轉化為可量化之權重結果，建立新成屋檢測項目之系統化評估架構，並以實務案例說明其可應用於檢測流程調整、資源配置、教育訓練及風險溝通。研究結果可作為驗屋業者、建設與營造單位及後續住宅品質管理研究之參考。;With increasing public awareness of housing quality and home-buying risks， pre-handover inspections for newly constructed residential buildings have become increasingly important. In recent years， third-party house inspection services have gradually gained popularity in Taiwan. However， most inspection practices still rely heavily on personal experience and lack a systematic and quantitative prioritization mechanism， resulting in insufficient standardization of inspection procedures and resource allocation. Therefore， this study applies the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish an importance evaluation model for inspection items in newly constructed housing， aiming to identify the relative importance and priority rankings of various inspection dimensions and criteria. Based on literature review and practical house inspection experience， this study constructs a hierarchical framework consisting of five major dimensions: structural and civil works system， equipment and components system， plumbing and waterproofing system， electrical and communication system， and environmental inspection system， including a total of 20 inspection criteria. A total of 29 valid expert questionnaires were collected from professionals with experience in house inspection， residential construction， construction management， and architectural supervision. The collected data were analyzed using the Expert Choice software for AHP weight calculation and consistency verification. The results indicate that the plumbing and waterproofing system has the highest importance weight (0.3298)， followed by the structural and civil works system (0.2743)， electrical and communication system (0.1816)， equipment and components system (0.1512)， and environmental inspection system (0.0632). This finding suggests that water leakage， waterproofing quality， and drainage system performance are considered the most critical issues in newly constructed housing inspections. Further analysis of the overall weights reveals that the top-ranked inspection items mainly involve water leakage inspection， drainage system performance， structural construction quality， and electrical safety inspection. These results indicate that major housing quality risks are primarily associated with water tightness， construction quality， and electrical safety. By applying the AHP method， this study transforms complex house inspection considerations into quantifiable evaluation results. The findings not only establish a systematic evaluation framework for newly constructed housing inspections but also provide practical references for inspection process optimization， resource allocation， personnel training， and residential quality management. <br> Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:17:28 GMT https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/111337 title: 勞工職業災害保險及保護法政策變遷研究：倡導聯盟架構觀點;A Study of Policy Change in Taiwan’s Labor Occupational Accident Insurance and Protection Act: An Advocacy Coalition Framework Perspective abstract: 我國職業災害保險制度長期附屬於勞工保險體系，職業災害之保險給付、預防及災後重建業務亦分散於不同法制與行政機關之中。為改善納保範圍不足、給付調整受限、預防與重建財源不穩定等問題，立法院於2021年三讀通過《勞工職業災害保險及保護法》，使我國職業災害保障制度由分散且具補充性質之制度，逐步轉向整合保險給付、職業災害預防及職能重建之專法體系。本研究以《勞工職業災害保險及保護法》之立法過程為研究核心，運用倡導聯盟架構，探討促成政策變遷之外在事件與政策窗、政策領域中的相對穩定變項、不同倡導聯盟之行動與動機、聯盟間及其與政府部門之衝突，以及政府在立法過程中所扮演之角色。 本研究採取質性研究途徑，以深度訪談法為主要研究方法，透過目的性抽樣訪談勞動部勞動保險司、勞工保險局、勞動部職業安全衛生署及民間職業安全衛生倡導團體之關鍵行動者；另輔以文獻分析法，蒐集立法院會議紀錄、政府機關文件、倡議團體聲明、新聞報導及相關研究資料，並將訪談資料與次級資料進行交叉檢證，以重建《勞工職業災害保險及保護法》之政策變遷過程。 研究發現，該法於2021年完成立法，並非由單一重大職業災害事件直接觸發，而是長期制度缺口、職業災害風險、工傷個案所揭露之保障不足、民間團體持續倡議，以及治理聯盟更替、政治承諾與行政推動能量逐步匯集後，所形成之漸進式政策窗。其次，職業災害與職業病問題之複雜性、勞工保險財務與基金永續壓力、中小企業及微型事業單位占比較高之產業結構，以及依法行政、法源依據與預算配置等憲政法制要求，構成限制政策選項與聯盟行動空間的相對穩定變項。 在政策次級系統中，本研究辨識出三類主要倡導聯盟，包括以行政機關為核心的制度整合與可行性推動聯盟、以民間倡導團體為核心的專法化倡導聯盟，以及由資方團體、部分職業工會與行政內部保守力量所構成的反對或防守性聯盟。各聯盟依其政策信念、組織利益、制度位置與可運用資源，分別採取草案研擬、跨機關協調、座談諮詢、政策論述建構、社會倡議、遊說及防守既有制度等策略。聯盟間的衝突亦非單純的勞資對立，而是圍繞保障擴張、保費與企業成本、雇主補償責任、承保通路、財務公平及行政執行可行性所形成的複合型衝突。 研究另發現，政府在立法過程中同時扮演議程推進者、制度設計者及政策掮客。政府不僅主動設定政策方向、整合保險給付與預防重建制度，也透過程序安排、協商及配套設計降低不同聯盟之衝突。然而，政府並非完全中立的仲裁者，而是在維持專法化核心方向之前提下進行折衝，呈現政策主導性與政策掮客性並存之特徵。整體而言，倡導聯盟架構對本個案具有相當解釋力，但仍應納入政策問題長期累積所形成的漸進式政策窗、聯盟內部異質性，以及臺灣強行政國家脈絡下「主導型政策掮客」之政府角色，方能更完整解釋我國職業災害保險政策的變遷過程。;Taiwan’s occupational accident insurance system was long incorporated into the broader labor insurance system， while insurance benefits， accident prevention， and post-accident rehabilitation services were dispersed across different legal frameworks and administrative agencies. To address problems such as insufficient insurance coverage， limited flexibility in benefit adjustments， and unstable funding for prevention and rehabilitation， the Legislative Yuan passed the Labor Occupational Accident Insurance and Protection Act in 2021. This legislation marked a gradual transition from a fragmented and supplementary occupational accident protection system toward a specialized statutory framework integrating insurance benefits， occupational accident prevention， and vocational rehabilitation. Focusing on the legislative process of the Act， this study applies the Advocacy Coalition Framework to examine the external events and policy windows that facilitated policy change， the relatively stable parameters within the policy domain， the actions and motivations of different advocacy coalitions， conflicts among coalitions and between coalitions and government agencies， and the role of the government throughout the legislative process. This study adopts a qualitative research approach， using in-depth interviews as its primary research method. Through purposive sampling， key actors from the Department of Labor Insurance of the Ministry of Labor， the Bureau of Labor Insurance， the Occupational Safety and Health Administration， and a non-governmental occupational safety and health advocacy organization were interviewed. Documentary analysis was also employed to examine Legislative Yuan records， government documents， statements issued by advocacy organizations， news reports， and relevant academic studies. The interview data were cross-validated with secondary sources to reconstruct the policy change process leading to the enactment of the Labor Occupational Accident Insurance and Protection Act. The findings indicate that the enactment of the Act in 2021 was not directly triggered by a single major occupational accident. Rather， it resulted from an incremental policy window created by the gradual convergence of long-standing institutional gaps， persistent occupational risks， repeated cases exposing deficiencies in worker protection， sustained advocacy by civil society organizations， changes in the governing coalition， political commitments， and growing administrative capacity for policy implementation. In addition， the complexity of occupational accidents and diseases， financial pressures on the labor insurance system and fund sustainability， Taiwan’s industrial structure characterized by a high proportion of small and micro enterprises， and constitutional and legal requirements concerning lawful administration， statutory authorization， and budget allocation constituted relatively stable parameters that constrained available policy options and the scope of coalition activities. Within the policy subsystem， this study identifies three major types of advocacy coalitions: an administrative-agency-centered coalition promoting institutional integration and implementation feasibility; a civil-society-centered coalition advocating the enactment of a separate statute; and an opposing or defensive coalition composed of employer organizations， certain occupational unions， and conservative elements within the administrative system. Based on their policy beliefs， organizational interests， institutional positions， and available resources， these coalitions adopted different strategies， including drafting legislation， interagency coordination， consultation meetings， policy discourse construction， public advocacy， lobbying， and the defense of existing institutional arrangements. Conflicts among the coalitions cannot be understood merely as conventional labor–management confrontation. Instead， they constituted multidimensional conflicts concerning the expansion of protection， insurance premiums and business costs， employers’ compensation liabilities， insurance enrollment channels， financial equity， and administrative feasibility. <br> Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:17:02 GMT https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/111334 title: 基礎設施機電工程分包商遴選影響因素權重之分析研究;An Analysis of the Weights of Influencing Factors in Subcontractor Selection for Infrastructure MEP Projects abstract: 基礎設施機電工程通常具有工程規模大、系統複雜、施工介面多及不確定性高等特 性。此類工程執行過程涉及電力、消防、空調、弱電、自動控制、通訊及監控等多項系統整合，並須與建築、結構、裝修及其他專業單位密切協調，因此，分包商已不僅是單純的施工執行單位，而是直接影響總承攬商履約成果、施工品質、工程進度及整體專案風險的重要合作夥伴。 然而，實務上總承攬商於分包商遴選時，仍多以價格、工程實績、基本資格、過往 合作經驗及承攬意願作為主要評估依據。此種選商方式雖可降低初期採購成本，但工程進入施工階段後，仍可能因人力投入不足、材料供應延遲、施工管理能力不足、系統整合困難、界面協調不佳、設計變更應對不足及履約管理能力欠佳等因素，造成工程延誤、品質下降、追加爭議及履約風險增加。因此，在大型基礎設施機電工程中，如何建立一套兼顧價格、履約能力及工程管理能力之分包商遴選評估架構，已成為總承攬商重要的管理課題。 本研究以基礎設施機電工程為研究範圍，從總承攬商分包商遴選之實務需求出發， 透過文獻探討與工程實務觀察，建立分包商遴選評估架構，並採用層級分析法（AnalyticHierarchy Process， AHP）作為研究工具，建構包含價格與報價條件、工程實績與基本資格、工程複雜度應對能力、履約資源與財務能力、系統整合與界面協調能力及履約與管理能力等六大構面之層級架構。研究對象為具基礎設施機電工程、分包商遴選、採購發包及工程管理實務經驗之專家，透過AHP成對比較分析各項評估因素之相對重要性，並進行一致性檢定，以確保分析結果之可信度。 研究結果顯示，在六大評估構面中，以履約與管理能力之權重最高，其次依序為系 統整合與界面協調能力、工程複雜度應對能力、履約資源與財務能力及工程實績與基本資格；而價格與報價條件之權重最低，顯示基礎設施機電工程分包商遴選已逐漸由傳統價格導向，轉向重視履約能力、工程管理能力及系統整合能力之多準則評估模式。 進一步針對準則層分析結果顯示，在履約與管理能力構面中，以履約與現場管理能 力最為重要；在系統整合與界面協調能力構面中，以跨系統及跨工種衝突處理能力最受重視；而在價格與報價條件構面中，則以報價完整性相對重要。研究結果反映大型基礎設施機電工程因施工介面多、系統整合程度高及履約期間長，總承攬商於分包商遴選時，相較於價格因素，更重視分包商是否具備整合能力、管理能力及履約能力，以降低後續施工及履約風險。 基於上述研究結果，本研究進一步提出基礎設施機電工程分包商遴選評估架構及實 務檢核建議，包括建立多準則評估機制、強化非價格因素之評估、建立履約能力檢核項目，以及將系統整合、界面協調及履約管理能力納入分包商遴選評估項目，作為總承攬商於分包商遴選、採購決策及履約風險控管之參考依據，亦可提供後續相關研究及工程實務應用之參考。;Infrastructure mechanical， electrical， and plumbing engineering projects are usually characterized by large project scale， complex systems， multiple construction interfaces， and high uncertainty. During project execution， these projects often involve the integration of various systems， including electrical power， fire protection， air conditioning， low-voltage systems， automatic control， communications， and monitoring systems. They also require continuous coordination with architectural， structural， interior finishing， and other professional disciplines. Therefore， in large-scale infrastructure MEP projects， subcontractors are no longer merely construction executors; rather， they are important partners who directly affect the general contractor’s project performance and risk management. In practice， when selecting subcontractors， general contractors often focus mainly on price，project experience， basic qualifications， previous cooperation experience， and willingness to undertake the work. Although this selection approach may reduce initial procurement costs，problems may still arise during the middle and later stages of project execution， such as insufficient manpower， delayed material supply， difficulties in interface coordination， incomplete documentation， inadequate response to design changes， and variation disputes. These issues may further affect project schedule， quality， and overall performance stability. This study focuses on infrastructure MEP engineering and explores the key factors affecting subcontractor selection from the practical perspective of general contractors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is adopted as the research method to establish a hierarchical framework for subcontractor selection. The framework consists of six dimensions: price and quotation conditions， project experience and basic qualifications， capability to respond to project complexity， contractual resources and financial capability， system integration and interface coordination capability， and performance and management capability. A questionnaire survey is conducted to collect judgments from professionals with experience in infrastructure MEP projects， subcontractor selection， procurement， tendering， or project management. The collected data are then used for weight analysis and consistency testing. Through the results of the AHP analysis， this study aims to establish a subcontractor selection evaluation framework that better reflects practical needs. The framework is expected to help general contractors consider not only price and basic conditions during the subcontractor selection stage， but also factors such as system integration， interface coordination， response to project complexity， and performance management. The findings may serve as a referencefor future subcontractor selection， procurement decision-making， and performance risk control. <br> Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:16:40 GMT https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/111330 title: 品質成本與風險感知對建設公司品牌價值之影響研究;The Effects of Quality Costs and Risk Perception on the Brand Value of Real Estate Developers abstract: 在建築開發市場中，建案品質、施工穩定性及建設公司履約能力，已成為消費者評估建案與建立品牌信任之重要依據。由於建築產品具有高總價及資訊不對稱等特性，建設公司之品質管理能力與市場信譽將直接影響消費者對品牌之認知與評價。然而，營建實務上，建設公司常面臨成本控制與品質提升之平衡問題，若前期品質投入不足，往往導致後續重工、修繕及交屋缺失增加，進而影響消費者對品牌之信任。因此，本研究探討不同品質成本構面對品牌價值之影響，並分析品質風險感知之中介效果，以作為建設公司進行品質成本配置決策之參考。 本研究以品質成本理論PAF模型（Prevention-Appraisal-Failure Model）為基礎，將品質成本區分為預防成本、鑑定成本與失敗成本三大構面，並結合品質風險感知與品牌價值建立研究架構。研究採問卷調查蒐集資料，並透過SPSS進行資料整理與前置統計分析，再運用結構方程模型（Structural Equation Modeling， SEM）進行研究模型驗證與假說檢驗。 研究結果顯示，預防成本、鑑定成本及失敗成本皆對品質風險感知具有顯著正向影響，其中以失敗成本之影響程度最高。品質風險感知亦對品牌價值具有顯著正向影響，顯示受訪者愈重視建案品質風險議題，愈傾向透過建設公司品牌作為評估與降低風險的重要依據。此外，品質風險感知在品質成本配置與品牌價值之間具有部分中介效果，其中預防成本與鑑定成本具有顯著中介效果，而失敗成本之中介效果未達統計顯著水準。 綜合而言，品質成本管理不應僅著重於降低短期成本，而應重視前期品質投入與品質成本配置之合理性。研究結果可作為建設公司品質管理、成本控制及品牌經營策略之參考依據。;In the real estate development industry， project quality， construction stability， and developers′ con-tractual fulfillment have become critical factors influencing consumers′ trust in developers′ brands. Due to the high value of housing products and information asymmetry in the real estate market， developers′ quality management capability and market reputation directly influence consumers′ perceptions of brand value. In practice， developers must balance cost control with quality improvement， as insufficient ear-ly-stage quality investment may lead to rework， repair costs， and handover defects， thereby reducing consumers′ trust in developers′ brands. Therefore， this study investigates the effects of different quality cost components on brand value and examines the mediating role of perceived quality risk to provide a reference for quality cost allocation. Based on the Prevention–Appraisal–Failure (PAF) model， quality costs are classified into preven-tion， appraisal， and failure costs to establish a research framework linking perceived quality risk and brand value. Questionnaire data were analyzed using SPSS for data processing and preliminary statis-tical analyses， followed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to validate the research model and test the hypotheses. The results indicate that prevention， appraisal， and failure costs each have significant positive ef-fects on perceived quality risk， with failure costs having the strongest effect. Perceived quality risk also has a significant positive effect on brand value， indicating that consumers rely more on developers′ brands when placing greater importance on quality-related risks. Furthermore， perceived quality risk par-tially mediates the relationship between quality costs and brand value. Significant mediation effects were found for prevention and appraisal costs， whereas the mediating effect of failure costs was not statistically significant. Overall， quality cost management should emphasize early-stage quality investment and appropri-ate quality cost allocation rather than focusing solely on short-term cost reduction. The findings provide practical guidance for quality management， cost control， and brand management strategies. <br> Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:16:29 GMT