本研究以大型國家級開發案之航空城都市計畫，選擇最具指標意義與 戰略優勢之「桃園航空城附近地區特定區計畫-安置住宅（A18 基地）」作為 實證分析個案。研究範疇精確鎖定於A18-1 至A18-3 小區之安置住宅，旨 在從政策規劃、實務執行及技術品質等面向進行深度剖析。本案在整體計畫 中扮演「先導示範」之關鍵角色，不僅在高度壓縮的3 年期程內克服了與周 邊公共工程、台電計畫性停電及極端氣候颱風之跨界面施工衝突，更透過履 約爭議調解成功追加30.87%之契約金額，化解全球原物料通膨之財務困難， 實現「零違約罰款」的高效履約管理。 在整體施工規劃上，本案系統性導入「循環經濟 RESOLVE 模型」，全 面對接「黃金級綠建築」與「合格級智慧建築」雙重標章標準，於綠化量、 基地保水、日常節能、二氧化碳減量、廢棄物減量、室內環境及水資源等七 大指標皆有實質技術作為，並導入特別監督制度以取得「耐震標章」，實質 落實對拆遷戶居住品質與結構安全之承諾 。 此外，針對專案實務執行末端之交屋與修繕管理，本研究經由數據盤點， 指出本案交屋執行率雖高達99.3%，但仍有部分個案受限於住戶貸款限制、 行政移轉滯礙、工程品質認知落差及不可抗力因素。研究進一步透過「無障 礙車位標線出入爭議」與「交屋入住後馬桶水箱損壞保固糾紛」等非典型瑕 疵之指標性痛點個案進行深度剖析。最終，本研究透過合約與技術之雙軌調 處機制完成行政閉環，並期望將此「桃園航空城經驗」轉化為兼具社會關懷 與開發效率之政策評估模型，作為台灣未來大規模徵收或都市更新計畫之 重要決策參考。;This study focuses on the Taoyuan Aerotropolis urban plan， a large-scale national development project， selecting the highly indicative and strategically advantageous "Taoyuan Aerotropolis Nearby Area Specific Zone Plan - Resettlement Housing (A18 Base)" as the case for empirical analysis. The research scope is precisely targeted at the resettlement housing in sub-zones A18- 1 to A18-3， aiming to conduct an in-depth analysis from the perspectives of policy planning， practical execution， and technical quality. Playing a crucial "pioneering and demonstrative" role in the overall plan， this project not only overcame crossinterface construction conflicts with surrounding public works， scheduled Taipower power outages， and extreme weather (typhoons) within a highly compressed three-year timeframe， but also successfully secured an additional 30.87% to the contract amount through contract dispute mediation. This resolved financial bottlenecks caused by global raw material inflation and achieved highly efficient performance management with "zero default penalties." In terms of overall construction planning， the project systematically introduced the "Circular Economy RESOLVE Model，" fully aligning with the dual certification standards of the "Gold-Level Green Building" and "Certified-Level Smart Building." It demonstrated tangible technical achievements across seven major indicators: greenery， site water retention， daily energy savings， carbon dioxide reduction， waste reduction， indoor environment， and water resources. Additionally， a special supervision system was implemented to obtain the "Seismic Resistant Building Mark，" tangibly fulfilling the commitment to structural safety and living quality for relocated households. Furthermore， regarding handover and repair management during the later stages of practical execution， a data inventory indicates that despite a handover execution rate as high as 99.3%， a few cases were still hindered by residents′ mortgage III limitations， administrative transfer obstacles， cognitive discrepancies in engineering quality， and force majeure factors. The study conducts a further indepth analysis of indicative pain-point cases involving atypical defects， such as "access disputes over accessible parking space markings" and "warranty disputes concerning toilet tank damage post-handover." Ultimately， this study completes an administrative closed-loop through a dual-track mediation mechanism encompassing contractual and technical approaches. It is anticipated that this "Taoyuan Aerotropolis Experience" will be transformed into a policy evaluation model that balances social care with development efficiency， serving as a vital decision-making reference for Taiwan′s future large-scale expropriation and urban renewal plans.
