本研究探討臺灣「室內裝修許可制度」與「耐燃材料管理」之實務漏洞與精進對策。現行制度過度仰賴實驗室靜態數據與書面審查，面對新興複合建材與複雜的施工生態，存在顯著的監管斷鏈，導致標準數據與現場實質防火性能產生落差。研究採取文獻分析、法規比較（美、歐、日）、深度訪談與個案研究，歸納現行體系之五大核心困境： 1.書審衍生隱蔽死角：竣工查驗偏重書面，天花板與牆體內部等隱蔽工程封板後缺乏實質查驗手段。 2.複合建材燃燒盲點：現行檢驗以單一材料為標的，無法有效評估「裝飾材＋基材」疊加後之非線性複合燃燒行為。 3.替代機制遭到濫用：「同等品」機制在成本壓力下流於降級套利；且因缺乏後市場隨機抽檢，市場充斥報告偽造與混料摻假。 4.現場科學鑑別量能不足：第一線查驗人員缺乏材料科學背景，且現場缺乏具法律效力之非破壞性檢測（NDT）儀器。 5.長期效能缺乏監控：忽視耐燃材料在臺灣高溫高濕氣候下，防火性能隨時間、環境與二次改裝而劣化衰退之隱性風險。 基於上述發現，本研究從四大面向提出「全生命週期動態管控」之精進策略： 1.行政優化：建置整合型數位審查平台，並依空間用途與風險建立「三級分級審查制度」。 2.技術革新：強制推動材料生產履歷（數位ID雷射雕刻與防偽QR Code），導入區塊鏈存證，並落實數位化監造即時申報。 3.三方驗證：引入具備TAF認證之第三方機構執行竣工現場抽驗與「二次抽檢」，推動施工監造簽證制度與專業責任保險。 4.效能深化：推動複合構造之整體使用型態測試，建置本土材料老化模型與火災情境資料庫（CFD/FDS），發行「建築物防火安全護照」進行長期監測。 綜上所述，本研究建議將室內裝修防火管理由傳統特定時間點的「行政點檢」，轉型為跨越源頭、施工至長期運作之動態管控制度，方能從根本消弭實驗室數據與現場性能之裂痕，切實保障臺灣民眾之生命財產安全。;This study investigates the practical loopholes and optimization strategies regarding Taiwan’s "Interior Decoration Permit System" and the "Management of Flame-Retardant Materials." The current system relies excessively on static laboratory data and documentary reviews. Confronted with emerging composite building materials and complex construction ecosystems， a significant regulatory disconnect has emerged， resulting in a discrepancy between standardized data and actual on-site fire performance. Utilizing literature analysis， comparative regulatory studies (US， EU， and Japan)， in-depth interviews， and case studies， this research identifies five core dilemmas within the current framework: 1. Hidden Blind Spots Arising from Documentary Reviews: Completion inspections focus heavily on paperwork; consequently， there is a lack of substantial inspection methods for concealed works (such as the interiors of ceilings and walls) once they are sealed. 2. Combustion Blind Spots of Composite Materials: Existing testing targets individual materials， failing to effectively evaluate the non-linear composite combustion behavior exhibited after stacking "decorative materials and substrates." 3. Abuse of Substitution Mechanisms: Under cost pressures， the "equivalence product" mechanism degenerates into downgrading for arbitrage; moreover， due to the absence of post-market random sampling， the market is rife with falsified reports and adulterated mixtures. 4. Insufficient Capacity for On-Site Scientific Identification: Frontline inspectors lack backgrounds in materials science， and there is a deficiency in legally valid Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) instruments on-site. 5. Lack of Long-Term Performance Monitoring: The current framework overlooks the hidden risks of flame-retardant materials deteriorating over time due to environment and subsequent remodeling under Taiwan’s hot and humid climate. Based on these findings， this study proposes an optimization strategy centered on "Full Lifecycle Dynamic Management" across four dimensions: 1. Administrative Optimization: Establish an integrated digital review platform and implement a "Three-Tier Risk-Based Review System" according to space occupancy and risk levels. 2. Technological Innovation: Mandate material production traceability (utilizing digital ID laser engraving and anti-counterfeiting QR codes)， introduce blockchain for data notarization， and enforce real-time reporting via digitized construction supervision. 3. Third-Party Verification: Introduce TAF-accredited (Taiwan Accreditation Foundation) third-party institutions to conduct on-site completion sampling and "secondary spot checks，" while promoting a construction supervision certification system and professional liability insurance. 4. Performance Deepening: Advance full-scale end-use configuration testing for composite structures， establish localized material aging models alongside fire scenario databases (CFD/FDS)， and issue "Building Fire Safety Passports" for long-term monitoring. In conclusion， this study recommends shifting interior decoration fire safety management from conventional time-specific "administrative checklists" to a dynamic management system that spans from the source and construction through to long-term operation. This transformation is essential to fundamentally bridge the gap between laboratory data and on-site performance， thereby safeguarding the lives and properties of the public in Taiwan.
