隨著綠建築制度逐漸成為連結永續績效與資本市場的重要工具，室內裝修建材技術能否回應國際制度需求，成為值得檢視的議題。既有研究多聚焦於建材性能本身或綠建材標章制度，較少從專利文字出發，系統性檢視技術供給與國際綠建築制度需求之間的缺口。本研究以台灣室內裝修建材專利技術為分析對象，以美國能源與環境設計領先認證（Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design [LEED]）室內設計與施工第五版作為國際制度標竿，透過專利分析、文字探勘與缺口分析，檢視台灣技術供給與國際制度需求之間的關係及潛在缺口。 本研究以台灣智慧財產局2010年至2025年間的本國公告專利為資料來源，依法規範疇、IPC分類及LEED條款關鍵字建立LEED技術群的專利資料集，共取得11，062筆專利資料，跨群去除重複後為8，098筆不重複專利。研究運用非負矩陣分解主題模型辨識技術主題，並建立技術主題與LEED條款的缺口分析矩陣。 研究結果顯示，台灣室內裝修建材專利技術已具有穩定的研發基礎，但低碳技術布局相對有限，碳排技術群僅占LEED技術群合計的0.9%。本研究共識別出30個核心技術主題，其中27個主題可與LEED制度需求形成方向上的關聯；然而，缺口分析矩陣中並無任何主題達到充分對應，逾半數可判讀單元屬於揭露落差型對應，顯示台灣建材技術雖已具備功能方向上的基礎，但專利文件揭露內容尚未充分呈現LEED所要求的量化指標、驗證方法與產品資訊揭露框架，反映研發端技術揭露與國際制度要求之間仍存在銜接落差。近年專利亦已出現「甲醛捕捉」、「負碳」等較接近制度需求的語彙，但此類訊號仍屬初步階段。 本研究建議，室內裝修業者應將材料選用由功能導向轉向證據導向，建材供應鏈則應將量化指標與驗證文件更明確納入產品技術資料，以提升台灣建材技術與國際綠建築制度的接軌能力。;As green building rating systems increasingly serve as tools linking sustainability performance with capital markets， whether Taiwan’s building materials for interior design and construction can respond to international institutional requirements has become a question worthy of examination. Existing research has mostly focused on material performance or green building material certification， with limited attention to systematically examining gaps between technological supply and international green building requirements from the perspective of patent text. This study analyzes Taiwan’s patents related to building materials for interior design and construction， using LEED v5 for Interior Design and Construction (LEED ID+C v5) as an international institutional benchmark. Through patent analysis， text mining， and gap analysis， this study examines the relationship and potential gaps between Taiwan’s technological supply and international institutional requirements. Patent data were sourced from domestic granted patents announced by the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office from 2010 to 2025. Based on regulatory scope， International Patent Classification (IPC) subclasses， and LEED clause keywords， patent datasets were established for each LEED technology group， yielding 11，062 patent records and 8，098 non-duplicate patents after cross-group duplicate removal. Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) topic modeling was applied to identify technology topics， and a gap analysis matrix was constructed between the technology topics and LEED clauses. The results show that Taiwan’s patents related to building materials for interior design and construction have a stable R&D base， although carbon-related technology remains limited， accounting for only 0.9% of the six LEED technology groups. Among the 30 identified core technology topics， 27 show directional alignment with LEED requirements. However， none of the topics achieved full correspondence in the gap analysis matrix， and more than half of the interpretable units were classified as disclosure-gap correspondence. This indicates that the main gap between Taiwan’s building-material technologies and LEED requirements is not the absence of relevant technologies， but whether the patent disclosure presents the quantifiable indicators， verification methods， and product information disclosure frameworks required by LEED. Recent patents have also shown emerging vocabulary such as “formaldehyde capture” and “carbon-negative，” although these signals remain preliminary. This study recommends that interior design and construction practitioners shift material selection from a function-oriented to an evidence-oriented approach， and that building-material suppliers incorporate quantifiable indicators， verification documentation， and product information disclosure more explicitly into product technical data， thereby strengthening the alignment between Taiwan’s building-material technologies and international green building requirements.
