原住民族狩獵活動不僅具有取得生活資源之功能，更承載族群認同、知識傳承及文化延續等重要文化內涵，應受憲法保障。然而，長期以來原住民族傳統狩獵文化與國家法制間存有衝突，其中以王光祿狩獵案最具代表性。本文從文化權法理基礎及原住民族權利保障之發展脈絡出發，探討國家介入原住民文化之過程及影響，並從國際法及國內法層面分析原住民族文化權之法理基礎及憲法地位。其次，以大法官釋字第803號解釋及王光祿狩獵案為核心，檢視司法實務對原住民族狩獵文化權之理解與適用，及其對相關法制發展之影響。 研究發現，我國對原住民族狩獵行為之規範，已由刑事管制為主，逐漸轉向兼顧原住民族文化權保障、生態保育及公共安全之多元價值。此一轉變不僅反映於司法實務對文化權保障之重視，亦體現於《原住民漁民自製獵槍魚槍許可及管理辦法》之訂定及《野生動物保育法》等相關法規之修正。然而，現行制度整體上仍以國家行政管理為主，原住民族在狩獵資源管理及制度決策上之參與程度仍有不足。 基於上述研究發現，本文認為未來原住民族狩獵制度應進一步朝向共管制度發展，使原住民族由被管理者轉變為共同治理者。為此，本文提出建立部落自主管理之法源依據及建構跨部會狩獵管理合作平台等建議，以提升原住民族參與狩獵管理事務之程度。在尊重原住民族文化之前提下，兼顧生態保育與公共安全，透過建立完善制度，落實原住民族文化權實質保障。;Indigenous hunting practices not only serve subsistence purposes but also embody essential cultural dimensions such as ethnic identity， knowledge transmission， and cultural continuity; hence， they warrant constitutional protection. However， long-standing conflicts have persisted between Indigenous traditional hunting cultures and the state’s legal system， with the Wang Guanglu case serving as the most representative example. This thesis begins with the theoretical foundations of cultural rights and the developmental context of Indigenous rights protection， exploring the process and impact of state intervention in Indigenous cultures. It further analyzes the legal basis and constitutional status of Indigenous cultural rights from both international and domestic legal perspectives. Focusing on Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 803 and the Wang Guanglu case， this study examines how judicial practice has understood and applied the cultural right to hunt， as well as its impact on relevant legal developments. The findings indicate that Taiwan’s regulation of Indigenous hunting has gradually shifted from a criminal prohibition-oriented regime toward a pluralistic framework that balances cultural rights protection， ecological conservation， and public safety. This transformation is reflected not only in judicial decisions but also in the enactment of the Regulations Governing Permission and Management of Homemade Hunting Guns and Spear Guns of Indigenous Peoples and Fishermen， as well as amendments to the Wildlife Conservation Act and other relevant regulations. However， the current system remains predominantly state-administered， leaving Indigenous peoples with limited participation in hunting resource management and policy decision-making. Based on these findings， this thesis argues that the Indigenous hunting system should further move toward a co-management regime， transforming Indigenous peoples from governed subjects into co-governors. Accordingly， this study proposes establishing a legal basis for indigenous self-management and a cross-ministerial cooperative platform for hunting management to enhance Indigenous participation in governance. Within the framework of respecting Indigenous culture while balancing ecological conservation and public safety， institutional reform should aim to ensure the substantive protection of Indigenous cultural rights.
