本論文以德希達文本中與李維史陀相關的篇幅為主，即〈人文科學論述中的結構、符號與遊戲〉與《論書寫學》中的〈文字的暴力：從李維史陀到盧梭〉，並以〈延異〉作為補充。首先試圖說明，德希達站在結構主義的內部，是如何看待李維史陀的貢獻與侷限。再者，德希達從要建立一門「書寫學」出發，在李維史陀與書寫的關係上，對李維史陀做出的批評為何。進一步則要指出，李維史陀這些受批評處，不論是其身處「結構性」思考可能產生的侷限，抑或是在貶抑文字／書寫而透露出與在場形上學的聯繫，其多少都在「在場」的影響下，與德希達對於「時間」的思考有所扞格。從而，德希達的論點、回應與論述，也在不同的面向上反映了德希達如何審視時間。於是，本論文的成果，則是希望藉此梳理，在對於李維史陀的批評中，德希達之論述所蘊含的時間性概念為何。;This thesis focuses primarily on the sections of Derrida′s texts that engage with Lévi-Strauss—namely， “Structure， Sign， and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences” and “The Violence of the Letter: From Lévi-Strauss to Rousseau” in Of Grammatology—with “Différance” serving as a supplementary reference. The thesis first seeks to demonstrate how Derrida， positioned from within structuralism， assesses both the contributions and the limitations of Lévi-Strauss. It then examines the critiques Derrida levels at Lévi-Strauss in relation to writing， driven by Derrida′s broader project of establishing a grammatology. The thesis further argues that the aspects of Lévi-Strauss subjected to Derrida’s critique—whether the constraints inherent in structural thinking or the metaphysics of presence implied by Lévi-Strauss′s denigration of writing—are， to varying degrees， shaped by the logic of presence， and thus stand in tension with Derrida′s thinking on time. Accordingly， Derrida’s arguments， responses， and discourse reflect， across different dimensions， how Derrida himself conceives of temporality. The contribution of this thesis， then， lies in tracing， through this critical engagement with Lévi-Strauss， the concept of temporality embedded in Derrida’s discourse.
