English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 96218/96218 (100%)
造訪人次 : 92462888      線上人數 : 247
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/110604


    題名: 電子商務平台行銷策略之研究─以M公司與C公司為例;電子商務平台行銷策略之研究─以M公司與C公司為例
    作者: 黃曉玲;LING, HUANG HSIAO
    貢獻者: 高階主管企管碩士班
    關鍵詞: 電子商務;行銷策略;物流服務品質;顧客滿意度;顧客忠誠度;自有物流;飛輪效應;e-commerce;marketing strategy;logistics service quality;customer satisfaction;customer loyalty;self-owned logistics;flywheel effect
    日期: 2026-07-13
    上傳時間: 2026-10-20 16:10:59 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 國立中央大學
    摘要: 隨著電子商務市場快速發展,消費者對電商平台之需求已不再侷限於商品價格與商品種類,而是逐漸轉向物流時效、服務品質、平台資訊透明度及整體購物體驗等多元構面。2022年C公司進入台灣市場後,以快速配送與低價策略作為主要競爭手段,對台灣既有電商平台形成挑戰。其中,M公司網長期深耕台灣市場,憑藉商品多樣性、會員制度與平台穩定性建立消費者黏著度;而C公司則透過火箭配送、自有物流體系及價格競爭力,強化其市場切入優勢。因此,本研究以m公司與C公司為研究對象,探討兩者在行銷策略與物流服務品質上之差異,以及其對顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度之影響。
    本研究採質性研究方法,透過深度訪談蒐集資料,並將受訪者分為A、B、C三組,每組5名,共計15名受訪者。A組為高頻次電商平台消費者,B組為低頻次電商平台消費者,C組為具五年以上物流相關工作經驗且具有網購經驗之消費者。研究構面包含行銷策略4 P’s,即產品策略、價格策略、通路策略與促銷策略,以及物流時效、物流服務品質、自有車隊服務品質、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度等面向,藉以分析不同族群對m公司與C公司之使用經驗與評價。
    研究結果顯示,物流時效已成為影響消費者選擇電商平台之重要因素。C公司透過火箭配送、火箭速配及自有物流體系,建立快速到貨之競爭優勢,特別在急需商品情境下,能有效提升消費者之優先選擇意願。相較之下,M公司雖具備一定配送穩定性與服務品質,但配送速度相對較慢,成為其現階段商業模式中較明顯之弱點。其次,價格競爭力雖會影響消費者平台轉換行為,但難以單獨建立長期忠誠;商品品質穩定性、平台資訊透明度及物流服務品質,亦會影響顧客滿意度與再購意願。

    此外,本研究發現,M公司與C公司在競爭定位上呈現明顯差異。m公司以商品多樣性、平台穩定性、會員制度及集團生態系資源建立顧客黏著度,C公司則以物流速度、價格競爭力與自有物流體系作為核心優勢。
    綜合而言,台灣電商平台競爭已由單一價格導向,轉變為結合物流速度、價格策略、商品品質、通路資訊與顧客體驗之多構面整合競爭。未來電商平台若欲提升長期競爭力,應強化物流效率、提升商品品質控管、優化平台資訊透明度,並透過會員制度與差異化服務提高顧客黏著度。本研究結果可作為電商平台業者制定行銷策略、物流策略與顧客經營策略之參考。;With the rapid development of the e-commerce market, consumers’ expectations of e-commerce platforms are no longer limited to product prices and product variety. Instead, they have gradually shifted toward multiple dimensions, including logistics timeliness, service quality, platform information transparency, and overall shopping experience. After Coupang entered the Taiwan market in 2022, it adopted fast delivery and low-price strategies as its main competitive approaches, posing a challenge to existing e-commerce platforms in Taiwan. Among these platforms, momo.com Inc. has long cultivated the Taiwan market and has built consumer stickiness through product diversity, membership systems, and platform stability. In contrast, Coupang has strengthened its market entry advantage through Rocket Delivery, its self-owned logistics system, and price competitiveness. Therefore, this study takes momo.com Inc. and Coupang as research subjects to explore the differences between the two platforms in marketing strategies and logistics service quality, as well as their influence on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty.

    This study adopts a qualitative research method and collects data through in-depth interviews. The interviewees are divided into three groups: Group A, Group B, and Group C, with five participants in each group, totaling 15 interviewees. Group A consists of high-frequency e-commerce platform consumers; Group B consists of low-frequency e-commerce platform consumers; and Group C consists of consumers with online shopping experience and more than five years of work experience in logistics-related fields. The research dimensions include the 4P’s of marketing strategy, namely product strategy, price strategy, place strategy, and promotion strategy, as well as logistics timeliness, logistics service quality, self-owned fleet service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. These dimensions are used to analyze the usage experiences and evaluations of different consumer groups toward momo.com Inc. and Coupang.

    The research findings show that logistics timeliness has become an important factor influencing consumers’ choice of e-commerce platforms. Through Rocket Delivery, fast delivery services, and its self-owned logistics system, Coupang has established a competitive advantage in fast delivery. This advantage is especially significant in urgent purchase situations, where it can effectively increase consumers’ willingness to prioritize the platform. In comparison, although momo.com Inc. demonstrates a certain degree of delivery stability and service quality, its delivery speed is relatively slower, making logistics timeliness a more obvious weakness in its current business model. In addition, although price competitiveness affects consumers’ platform-switching behavior, it is difficult to build long-term loyalty based solely on price. Product quality stability, platform information transparency, and logistics service quality also affect customer satisfaction and repurchase intention.

    Furthermore, this study finds that momo.com Inc. and Coupang differ significantly in their competitive positioning. momo.com Inc. builds customer stickiness through product diversity, platform stability, membership systems, and group ecosystem resources, whereas Coupang relies on logistics speed, price competitiveness, and its self-owned logistics system as its core advantages.

    Overall, competition among e-commerce platforms in Taiwan has shifted from a single price-oriented approach to multidimensional integrated competition that combines logistics speed, pricing strategy, product quality, channel information, and customer experience. In the future, if e-commerce platforms aim to enhance long-term competitiveness, they should strengthen logistics efficiency, improve product quality control, optimize platform information transparency, and increase customer stickiness through membership systems and differentiated services. The findings of this study can serve as a reference for e-commerce platform operators in formulating marketing strategies, logistics strategies, and customer management strategies.
    顯示於類別:[高階主管企管(EMBA)碩士班] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML5檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明