具有商業背景的政治人物常以私人部門經驗作為其治理能力與政策判斷的依據。 本研究檢驗臺北市議會第 14 屆議員的商業背景是否與其提案優先順序相關。研 究建立 61 位議員與 628 件第一提案議案的手工編碼資料，並依事前明確的職業 證據，分別採用嚴格與寬鬆兩種商業背景定義。議案分為基本服務型（A）、價值 增益型（B）、重分配型（C）、議會規範型（D）與市長質詢型（E）。實證分析包 括群體比例比較、以議員提案比例為依變數的 OLS模型，以及以提案件數為依變 數並以總提案數作為 offset 的 Poisson 模型。描述性比例檢定顯示，商業背景 議員提出較高比例的價值增益型議案，並提出較低比例的重分配型議案。加入性 別、年齡、任期、主要政黨與選區控制後，OLS 結果未達統計顯著；Poisson 結 果則顯示，在兩種商業背景定義下，商業背景均與價值增益型提案率呈正向且顯 著關聯。由於樣本限於單一城市、單一屆期，且背景與議案分類仍涉及判斷，本 研究將結果界定為探索性關聯，而非因果效果。;Businesspeople who enter public office often claim that private-sector experience improves their ability to manage organizations， solve problems， and create public value. This study examined whether the business backgrounds of Taipei City councilors were associated with their proposal priorities. It used an original， hand-coded dataset covering 61 councilors and 628 first-proposed bills from the 14th term of the Taipei City Council. Councilors were classified under strict and broad definitions of business background， and proposals were coded as basic-service (A)， value-added (B)， redistributive (C)， council-regulation (D)， or mayoral-interpellation (E) proposals. The empirical analysis combined group-level proportion tests， OLS models of councilor- level proposal shares， and Poisson models of proposal counts with total proposals included as an offset. The descriptive tests indicated that business-background councilors submitted a higher share of value-added proposals and a lower share of redistributive proposals. After observable councilor characteristics were controlled， the OLS estimates were not statistically significant; however， the Poisson models showed a positive and statistically significant association between business background and the rate of value-added proposals under both business-background definitions. Because the study covered one city and one council term and relied on judgment-based coding， the findings were interpreted as exploratory associations rather than causal effects.
