English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 96218/96218 (100%)
造訪人次 : 92462888      線上人數 : 247
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/110650


    題名: 自動駕駛車輛事故之被害人保障-以英國法為借鏡;Liability Allocation and Victim Protection in Automated Vehicle Accidents: Insights from UK Law for Taiwan
    作者: 許之瀧;LUNG, SHIU CHIH
    貢獻者: 產業經濟研究所
    關鍵詞: 自動駕駛車輛;被害人保障;交通事故責任;強制汽車責任保險;商品責任;英國自動駕駛法制;自動駕駛車輛法;Automated vehicles;Victim protection;Traffic accident liability;Compulsory automobile liability insurance;Product liability;UK automated vehicle law;Automated Vehicles Act
    日期: 2026-07-14
    上傳時間: 2026-10-20 16:16:05 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 國立中央大學
    摘要: 隨著人工智慧、感測技術與車輛控制系統之發展,自動駕駛車輛逐漸進入道路測試與實際應用階段。相較於傳統車輛主要由自然人駕駛人操控,自動駕駛車輛於特定條件下得由系統執行動態駕駛任務,使事故原因不再必然能歸屬於駕駛人之故意或過失,而可能涉及系統判斷、軟體更新、商品瑕疵、道路環境及人機互動等多重因素。

    本文檢討我國現行民法侵權責任、動力車輛駕駛人責任、商品責任及強制汽車責任保險制度於自動駕駛事故中之適用可能與限制。本文認為,我國現行制度雖可作為事故損害填補之基礎,惟其規範架構仍主要建立於傳統車輛由駕駛人控制之想像,面對高度自動化所造成之責任分散、資訊偏在及舉證困難,尚有調整必要。

    為尋求我國未來法制建構之參考,本文以英國法為主要比較對象,分析其2018年《Automated and Electric Vehicles Act》所建立之保險人優先賠償制度,以及2024年《Automated Vehicles Act》所發展之自動駕駛車輛認定、授權、自動駕駛實體、使用者角色區分與持續安全監理機制。英國法制之特色在於將被害人迅速獲得補償與事故風險之制度性管理相結合,並由事故後責任追究逐步延伸至事前安全治理。本文認為我國未來應在既有法制基礎上,建立自動駕駛車輛之認定、資訊保存、責任主體配置及保險補償機制,以強化自動駕駛事故中被害人之實質保障。;With the development of artificial intelligence, sensing technologies, and vehicle control systems, automated vehicles are gradually entering the stage of road testing and practical application. Unlike conventional vehicles, which are mainly controlled by human drivers, automated vehicles may perform dynamic driving tasks through automated systems under certain conditions. As a result, the causes of accidents can no longer necessarily be attributed to the intent or negligence of drivers, but may involve system judgment, software updates, product defects, road conditions, and human-machine interaction.

    This thesis examines the applicability and limitations of Taiwan’s current legal framework, including tort liability, motor vehicle driver liability, product liability, and compulsory automobile liability insurance, in the context of automated vehicle accidents. It argues that although the existing system may provide a basis for compensation, it remains largely premised on the traditional assumption that vehicles are controlled by human drivers. In light of liability dispersion, information asymmetry, and evidentiary difficulties caused by high-level automation, legal adjustment is still necessary.

    To provide references for future legal reform in Taiwan, this thesis takes UK law as the main comparative object. It analyzes the insurer-first compensation mechanism under the 2018 Automated and Electric Vehicles Act and the regulatory framework developed under the 2024 Automated Vehicles Act, including vehicle authorization, responsible entities, user roles, and continuing safety oversight. The UK framework integrates prompt victim compensation with systematic risk management, extending from post-accident liability allocation to ex ante safety governance.

    This thesis suggests that Taiwan should establish mechanisms for the recognition of automated vehicles, preservation of relevant information, allocation of responsible parties, and insurance compensation, so as to strengthen substantive protection for victims of automated vehicle accidents.
    顯示於類別:[產業經濟研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML7檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明