English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 96218/96218 (100%)
造訪人次 : 93572030      線上人數 : 207
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/111179


    題名: 古典漢語歷史文獻的跨視角事件對齊:壬辰之役多訊號檢索研究;Cross-Perspective Event Alignment in Classical Chinese Historical Records: A Multi-Signal Retrieval Study on the Imjin War
    作者: 施采廷;TING, SHIH TSAI
    貢獻者: 資訊工程學系
    關鍵詞: 跨視角事件對齊;資訊檢索;古典漢語;壬辰之役;知識圖譜;多訊號檢索;Cross-Perspective Event Alignment;Information Retrieval;Classical Chinese;Imjin War;Knowledge Graph;Multi-Signal Retrieval
    日期: 2026-08-31
    上傳時間: 2026-10-20 17:01:20 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 國立中央大學
    摘要: 《明實錄》與《朝鮮王朝實錄》從不同歷史視角記載壬辰之役(1592–1598)期間許多相同事件,但兩者在詞彙、人物稱謂、記錄日期與敘事重點上存在差異,使自動對齊具有高度挑戰。本論文將此問題定義為跨視角事件對齊(Cross-Perspective Event Alignment, CPEA),並形式化為多標籤檢索任務:給定一筆明側記載,從朝鮮側語料中找出描述同一歷史事件的相關記錄。

    為處理此任務,本研究建置經人工驗證的雙年份資料集,並採用跨年份的 development–test 設計,以評估方法的跨期泛化能力。方法上結合三種互補的檢索範式,包括稀疏字面檢索、密集語意檢索與知識圖譜結構匹配,再透過 Bayesian optimization 進行加權分數融合,以建立高召回率的候選池供後續語意判斷使用。

    實驗結果顯示,不同檢索範式能捕捉不同類型的事件對應關係。字面方法較適合處理具有明確文字重疊的案例,而語意與結構表示則能為較隱性的事件對應提供互補訊號。融合系統在不同歷史時期之間亦能維持有效的檢索能力,但敘事改寫仍是最具挑戰性的類型。整體而言,結合字面、語意、時間與關係結構等多種證據,比單一檢索範式更適合處理跨視角歷史事件對齊。;The Ming Shilu and Joseon Sillok record many of the same events of the Imjin War (1592–1598) from different historical perspectives. However, differences in vocabulary, personal designations, recording dates, and narrative emphasis make automatic alignment between the two classical Chinese corpora challenging. This thesis formulates the problem as Cross-Perspective Event Alignment (CPEA), a multi-label retrieval task that retrieves Joseon-side records describing the same underlying event as a given Ming-side record.

    To address this task, a manually verified dual-year dataset is constructed and a temporally separated development–test setting is adopted to evaluate cross-period generalization. The proposed framework combines three complementary retrieval paradigms: sparse lexical retrieval, dense semantic retrieval, and knowledge-graph structural matching. Representative signals from these paradigms are integrated through Bayesian-optimized weighted score fusion to construct a high-recall candidate pool for downstream semantic judgment.

    Experimental results show that the three retrieval paradigms capture different types of event correspondence. Lexical methods are most effective for explicit textual overlap, while semantic and structural representations provide complementary evidence for more implicit correspondences. The fused system also maintains effective retrieval performance across historical periods, although narrative paraphrases remain the most challenging category. Overall, the results demonstrate that combining lexical, semantic, temporal, and relational evidence provides a more robust approach to cross-perspective historical event alignment than relying on a single retrieval paradigm.
    顯示於類別:[資訊工程研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML12檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明