隨著住宅品質意識提升及購屋風險觀念增加，新成屋交屋前之檢測需求日益受到重視。近年第三方驗屋服務逐漸普及，惟現行作業多依賴檢測人員之實務經驗，缺乏系統化與量化之重要性評估機制，致使檢測流程、時間與資源配置不易形成一致標準。基於此，本研究以新成屋檢測項目為研究對象，運用層級分析法（Analytic Hierarchy Process， AHP）建立檢測項目之重要性評估架構，探討各檢測構面與準則之相對權重及優先順序。 本研究透過文獻回顧及實務檢測內容整理，建構「建築土建系統」、「設備與構件系統」、「給排水與防水系統」、「電氣與通訊系統」及「環境檢測系統」五大構面，共20項檢測準則。研究對象為具新成屋檢測、住宅工程、施工管理、設計監造及室內裝修等相關經驗之專業人士，共取得29份有效問卷，並以Expert Choice軟體進行權重計算及一致性檢定。 研究結果顯示，五大構面以給排水與防水系統權重最高（0.3298），其次依序為建築土建系統（0.2743）、電氣與通訊系統（0.1816）、設備與構件系統（0.1512）及環境檢測系統（0.0632）。跨構面整體權重排序前十項主要集中於排水功能、滲漏水、施工品質及用電安全，顯示新成屋品質風險主要聚焦於水密性、土建施工品質與電氣安全。 本研究將驗屋項目由經驗性判斷轉化為可量化之權重結果，建立新成屋檢測項目之系統化評估架構，並以實務案例說明其可應用於檢測流程調整、資源配置、教育訓練及風險溝通。研究結果可作為驗屋業者、建設與營造單位及後續住宅品質管理研究之參考。;With increasing public awareness of housing quality and home-buying risks， pre-handover inspections for newly constructed residential buildings have become increasingly important. In recent years， third-party house inspection services have gradually gained popularity in Taiwan. However， most inspection practices still rely heavily on personal experience and lack a systematic and quantitative prioritization mechanism， resulting in insufficient standardization of inspection procedures and resource allocation. Therefore， this study applies the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish an importance evaluation model for inspection items in newly constructed housing， aiming to identify the relative importance and priority rankings of various inspection dimensions and criteria. Based on literature review and practical house inspection experience， this study constructs a hierarchical framework consisting of five major dimensions: structural and civil works system， equipment and components system， plumbing and waterproofing system， electrical and communication system， and environmental inspection system， including a total of 20 inspection criteria. A total of 29 valid expert questionnaires were collected from professionals with experience in house inspection， residential construction， construction management， and architectural supervision. The collected data were analyzed using the Expert Choice software for AHP weight calculation and consistency verification. The results indicate that the plumbing and waterproofing system has the highest importance weight (0.3298)， followed by the structural and civil works system (0.2743)， electrical and communication system (0.1816)， equipment and components system (0.1512)， and environmental inspection system (0.0632). This finding suggests that water leakage， waterproofing quality， and drainage system performance are considered the most critical issues in newly constructed housing inspections. Further analysis of the overall weights reveals that the top-ranked inspection items mainly involve water leakage inspection， drainage system performance， structural construction quality， and electrical safety inspection. These results indicate that major housing quality risks are primarily associated with water tightness， construction quality， and electrical safety. By applying the AHP method， this study transforms complex house inspection considerations into quantifiable evaluation results. The findings not only establish a systematic evaluation framework for newly constructed housing inspections but also provide practical references for inspection process optimization， resource allocation， personnel training， and residential quality management.
