目前多元評量的評量方式在於評量學生的閱讀素養、數學素養以及科學素養的部分，在試題的創作方面，目前很少有一個專門提供多元評量的共同創題平台來幫助老師們共同合作討論及創題，在共同合作的環境下，老師們不知道如何去分工、不清楚如何用有效率的創題方法，因此，本研究的目標在於解決老師們在合作創作閱讀素養題時所遇到的上述困難，將一套現有的合作寫作流程改進成本研究的合作創題流程來讓老師可以有架構性的出題、達到有效的分工以及能夠清楚的掌握出題的進度，並且說明經由我們的系統是否有讓老師們花比較少的時間出題，以及是否經由我們的系統出題品質有比較好。 本研究採用HCI人機互動(Human Computer Interaction)理論來分析老師們目前在現有的社群平台進行合作創作閱讀素養題時所遭遇到的問題，將遭遇到的問題提供一個有效的解決方案。在本研究的系統上可以幫助老師們快速的找到資料以及整理資料，透過樹狀圖的方式掌握合作創題的進度以及讓老師可以進行協同合作模式來提升出題的效率。而為了評估這樣的合作創題模式是否能夠真的達到我們的目標，我們與十位國中老師進行為期三個月的閱讀素養創題活動，並且在最後我們用一份問卷來調查老師們在這期間合作創題的感受、滿意度以及意見，也透過訪談的方式來讓我們了解整體系統的功能並進行評估。此外，我們也比較系統與目前老師們有在使用的合作創題的平台以及一些熱門的網站，分析並比較在我們系統上的優勢及弱勢。在最後，我們將歸納出我們的結論。 Currently, the multiple evaluation have supported reading literacy, mathematics literacy and science literacy, but few website focus on the create subject and help teacher to collaborative writing. In the collaborative environment, teachers don’t know how to divide the work and not clear how to use efficiency of method to create subject. Therefore, our goal is given teacher a solution which can solve above-mentioned problems and we modify existing collaborative writing process to suitable innovate subject condition. The process can let teacher to co-work, be structure innovate, achieve divide the work and grasp the innovate subject progress. We apply the HCI (Human Computer Interaction) theorem to analysis teachers they receive the problems in the social website when they are collaborative innovating and we give them the efficiency solution. In our system, it can help teachers to find data quick, sort out data and through the tree structure to grasp collaborative progress. To evaluate this collaborative mode is good or not, we work with ten junior high school teachers and participate reading literacy innovate activities for three months. Finally, we use questionnaire to investigate teacher’s feeling, satisfaction, suggestion and we also interview teachers to understand our system design is good for them or not. In addition, we also compared with the current website the teachers have already used and we analysis these website the advantage and disadvantage. In the last one, we will summarize our conclusions.
