宋代是《春秋》學極興盛之時代，其上承唐代的啖助、趙匡與陸淳等人，有著與三《傳》不同的解經風貌。宋代《春秋》學最普遍使用的方式即是以義例解經。自孫復以下至胡安國，雖然對《春秋》經說有所不同，但其均普遍使用義例的方式來解經。朱熹是宋代理學大家，其與不同於眾人之見，朱熹對以義例解經提出強烈的批評。但因朱熹本人沒有《春秋》的專著，所以亦無從深入了解不以義例解《春秋》其所展現出的樣貌為何。黃仲炎、黃震與呂大圭三人為南宋中晚期的《春秋》學家，均自許承續朱熹的主張。其在方法上均以反對義例解《春秋》並且都有寫成《春秋》注解。所以本計畫擬分三年，分別對黃仲炎、黃震與呂大圭三人之《春秋》學加以研究，並最後由三個面向加以對比與反省，希望能對《春秋》方法學及南宋《春秋》學有更多的了解。 ;The Song Dynasty was the era of the flourishing of the Chun-Qiu.There is a different style of learning from the predecessors.The most common use of the Chun-Qiu in the Song Dynasty is to use the regulations.From Sun Fu to Hu Anguo,They have a different understanding of the Chun-Qiu, But all of the same rules are used to explain.Zhu Xi is an agent of Song Dynasty.Zhu Xi disagrees with the rules of the rules to explain the classics.Huang Zhongyan, Huang Zhen and Lv Dagui, the three scholars of the late Southern Song Dynasty, the Chun-Qiu.They all believe that Zhu Xi's point of view is continued.The plan is scheduled to use three years.The study of the three people of Huang Zhongyan, Huang Zhen and Lv Dagui.We hope to have more understanding of the methods of interpreting the Analects of Confucius and of the Analects of Southern Song.
