朱子「明德注」的思想與韓國朝鮮朝儒學有關「明德」的討論;On Zhu Xi’S Remark of Mingde and the Debate of Mingdeamong Korean Confucians in Joseon Dynasty

NCU Institutional Repository > 文學院 > 哲學研究所 > 研究計畫 > Item 987654321/78552

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/78552

题名:	朱子「明德注」的思想與韓國朝鮮朝儒學有關「明德」的討論;On Zhu Xi’S Remark of Mingde and the Debate of Mingdeamong Korean Confucians in Joseon Dynasty
作者:	楊祖漢
贡献者:	國立中央大學哲學研究所
关键词:	朱子;明德;朝鮮儒學;當代儒學;Zhu-Xi;Mingde;Korean Confucianism;Contemporary Confucianism
日期:	2018-12-19
上传时间:	2018-12-20 12:03:54 (UTC+8)
出版者:	科技部
摘要:	朱子對《大學》「明德」的注解引發了當時及後代儒者許多的討論，究竟明德是指心或是指性而言？在朱子的有關文獻中都可以找出根據。當代牟宗三先生認為依朱子，明德是指性而言，對此他做了非常嚴謹明白的分疏，又對朱子的注文給出修訂。韓國朝鮮朝的儒者有所謂明德論爭，即對於明德究竟是心或是理（性）有針鋒相對的辯論，這一問題牽涉到華西學派與艮齋學派。筆者細探「明德注」與《大學或問》、《朱子語類》、《文集》的有關的文獻，認為明德是以心為主，而性理在心中呈現之意。明德不只是心或理（性），而是兩者關聯在一起，此說應該是朱子詮釋明德的原意。本計劃準備證成此一對明德的理解，並由此說明朱子在「明德注」中所說的「因其所發而遂明之」是表示理在心中隨時有其流露，故人對於道德之理是本有所知的。本著此對性理的本知或已知，就可以進一步而求真知，故朱子可以說「因其已知之理而益窮之」，而所謂「一旦豁然貫通」，便有理論上的根據，而非「異質的跳躍」。如此解釋，應可以對朱子的成德理論給出一個較為順當的說明。 ;Zhu Xi’s remark on Mingde (明德) in Great Learning has been concerned and discussed by the Confucians. The issue is that what doesMingde refer to, Xin(心) or Xing(性)? The interpretative reasonableness of ach definition of Mingde can be found in Zhu Xi’s Texts. According to the contemporary Confucian, Mr. Mou Zhongsan’s interpretation based on both of his philosophical argument and plenty of Zhu Xi’s texts, Mingde refers to Xing. Furthermore, Mr. Mou revised Zhu Xi’s remark on Mingde. The Koreans Confucians between Hua-Xi School (華西學派) and Gen-Zhai School (艮齋學派), in the Joseon Dynasty, also debated the question. After I investigated the related texts to Mingde among Daxue huo-wen (大學或問), Zhu zi yu lei(朱子語類), and Zhuzi wenji(朱子文集), my interpretation should be as: when Zhu Xi uses the term, Mingde, the prospect that he emphasizes refers to Xin, and sees Li as the standard of moral judgment remaining within the Xin. Therefore, the meaning of Mingdeimplies Xin and Xing, and the relation, in the functioning meaning, between Xin and Xing is inseparable. My interpretation of Mingde is supposed to be coherent to Zhu Xi’s understanding of the relation between Xin and Xing, when he discusses Mingde. This project attempts to justify this interpretation of Mingde of Zhu Xi’s moral philosophy. Based on this interpretation, Zhu’s terminology, to be devoted to practice the moral judgment when it appears [yin qi suo fa er sui mingzhi; 因其所發而遂明之], means that Li which remains within Xing spontaneously functions. In this sense, one’s ordinary rational understanding of morality is not acquired from the experience. And one of the purposes of Zhu’s practical theory is to elevate one’s“ordinary rational understanding of morality”toward “philosophical rational understanding of morality”(chen-chih; 真知). Zhu’s terminology, huoran guantong (豁然貫通), whose meaning is not “radical transformation [yizhi tiaoyue;異質跳躍]” has theoretical basis. I believe that this should be a reasonable and appropriate explanation of Zhu Xi’s moral theory.
關聯:	財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心
显示于类别:	[哲學研究所] 研究計畫

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	340	检视/开启

在NCUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

数据加载中.....