本研究名以「比較老師、學生、專家對數學科創意教學的觀點」為探討的主題。利用『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』之評分數據為主,試圖釐清三者觀點之異同。並提出有關數學科創意教學的研究結論及具體建議,以供教師教學或其他相關競賽參考。 本研究主要採用的研究方法為「內容分析法」,利用競賽之評分數據及資料來做內容的分析。此外，利用列聯表 考驗來考驗學生與參賽教師評分觀點之獨立性。對參加數學科創意教學競賽的教師之建議：在設計作品應強調作品的正確性、並融入學生的日常生活經驗。對數學科教師的建議:可採用PPPP教學法 (people and props，proxy，picture，practice，PPPP) 將遊戲融入教學、讓學生有機會親自操作教學媒體、以引導的方式帶領學習、舉創意的例子或創意解題技巧、與其它科目協同教學等。 This paper is named “Comparing creative teaching viewpoints of teacher, students and experts.” for our research topic. By using the scoring data of “The Annual 2005 Math Creative Pedagogic Contest” to analyze the similarities and dissimilarities between these three compared groups. We address results about mathematical creative teaching and some specific teaching suggestions. Our approach is called “Content Analysis” that is using the scoring data of the teaching contest for analyzing. In addition, we employ Contingency table test to test whether the scoring viewpoints of students and teachers who entered the competition is independent or not. The suggestions for the teachers entered the competition: When you are designing your productions, you should emphasize the correctness of productions. The suggestions for the mathematical teachers: using “PPPP” teaching strategy (people and props, proxy, picture, practice, PPPP). The way contains blend game into teaching; students have the opportunity of operating teaching media; leading learning; making creative ideas or solving problems skillfully; team teaching with other subjects.
