中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/88477
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 80990/80990 (100%)
Visitors : 42695111      Online Users : 1494
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/88477


    Title: 分期分級董事會制度與財務報表可比性之關聯性研究;The Relationship between the Staggered Board and Financial Statement Comparability
    Authors: 鍾鳴;Chung, Ming
    Contributors: 財務金融學系
    Keywords: 分期分級董事會制度;財務報表可比性;盈餘操縱;公司治理;Staggered Board;Financial Statement Comparability;Earning Manipulation;Corporate Governance
    Date: 2022-06-22
    Issue Date: 2022-07-14 13:43:46 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 近年來,分期分級董事會制度(Staggered Board)作為公司治理的議題之一,逐漸廣為人知、並開始被全球的企業所採用。本文旨在探討分期分級董事會制度對財務報表可比性(Financial Statement Comparability)的影響、以及兩者間的關聯性。我們使用西元1998年至2018年之美國上市公司作為研究樣本進行實證分析,且本文之分期分級董事會制度之定義方式沿襲Faleye (2007)與Zhao and Chen (2008);財務報表可比性的計算方法則參照De Franco et al. (2011)。

    實證結果顯示,分期分級董事會制度與財務報表可比性呈現顯著之正相關,顯示分期分級董事會制度的存在將使公司高層的職位穩定性增加,進而減少、甚至停止為了不被解雇而執行的盈餘操縱行為,從而提升財務報表的可比程度。從實證結果中亦可發現,在使用分期分級董事會制度的情況下,年齡較輕、受機構投資人監督程度高的公司,將對財務報表可比性產生相對更強的效果;此外,本文發現上述分期分級董事會制度對於財務報表可比性之顯著效力顯著集中於營運績效並非在排名前段的公司之中。;In last decades, the policy of staggered board has gradually become widely known and has been adopted by the firms around the world. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the staggered board and financial statement comparability. We use the data of listed firms in the United States with the period from 1998 to 2018 as our sample. Besides, we follow Faleye (2007), Zhao and Chen (2008) to define the variable for firms’ adoption of staggered board. As for the definition of financial statement comparability, we use the methodology proposed by De Franco et al. (2011) to calculate it.

    The empirical results show that the adoption of staggered board increase the quality of firms’ financial statement comparability significantly. It reveals that the adoption of staggered board prevents the directors and managers from being laid off, which will consequently stop their earning manipulation behavior for the purpose of keeping their jobs and then improve the financial statement comparability. The empirical results also show that the effects of the adoption of staggered board are greater in firms with younger age or higher institutional ownership. Furthermore, we find that these effects are more pronounced in non-outperform firms.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Finance] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML84View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明