參考文獻 |
References
Bakeman, R. and Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., and Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for ex- amining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of educational computing research, 17(4):397–431.
Gunter, P., Jack, S., Shores, R., Carrell, D., and FLOWERS, J. (1993). Lag se- quential analysis as a tool for functional analysis of student disruptive behav- ior in classrooms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1(3):138.
Harasim, L. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc. Westport, CT, USA.
Harasim, L. (1993). Collaborating in cyberspace: Using computer confer- ences as a group learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(2):119–130.
Hew, K. and Cheung, W. (2003). Models to evaluate online learning commu- nities of asynchronous discussion forums. Australian journal of educational technology, 19(2):241–259.
Hiltz, S. (1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. Online education: Perspec- tives on a new environment, pages 133–183.
Hou, H., Chang, K., and Sung, Y. (2007). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive learning environments, 15(3):237–251.
Hou, H., Chang, K., and Sung, Y. (2008). Analysis of problem-solving based online asynchronous discussion pattern. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1):17–28.
Hou, H., Chang, K., and Sung, Y. (2009). Using blogs as a professional develop- ment tool for teachers: analysis of interaction behavioral patterns. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4):325–340.
Hou, H., Chang, K., and Sung, Y. (2010). Applying lag sequential analysis to detect visual behavioural patterns of online learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2):E25–E27.
Jeong, A. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1):25–43.
Muilenburg, L. and Berge, Z. A framework for designing questions for online learning. Berge Collins Associates Available online: http://www. emodera- tors. com/moderators/muilenburg. html [19 July 2003].
Pena-Shaff, J., Martin, W., and Gay, G. (2001). An Epistemological Framework for Analyzing Student Interactions in Computer-Medicated Communication Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(1).
Pena-Shaff, J. and Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3):243–265.
Puustinen, M., Bernicot, J., and Bert-Erboul, A. (2010). Written computer- mediated requests for help by French-speaking students: An analysis of their forms and functions. Learning and Instruction.
Wilkes, C. and Burnham, B. (1991). Adult Learner Motivations and Electronic Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1):43–50.
Willson, V. (1988). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential anal- ysis.
Zhu, E. (1996). Meaning Negotiation, Knowledge Construction, and Mentoring in a Distance Learning Course.
孫治本 (2002). 網路學習中的互動式學習-以BBS社群氛圍提昇學習參與度之研究. In ELTA2002「網路學習理論與實務」學術研討會(國立交通大學 主辦;2002.10.31.).
謝佩宜 and 周倩 (2006). 網路數學討論區使用者之批判思考表現, 參與歷程觀感, 動機與程度之相關研究. 科學教育學刊, 14(1):83–100.
馬秀蘭 (2004). 數學乘除問題情境發展之研究–以 BBS 為管道. 科學教育學刊, 12(1):53–81.
魏立欣 and Roblyer, M. (2004). 教育科技融入教學. 台北: 高等教育.
|