摘要(英) |
Flexible production strategy is very important for a business. Product homemade can directly control the production process and quality, and product outsourcing can reduce the cost of production and inventory control, and the fickle nature of the external market environment, how to do a quick and effective homemade or outsourcing decisions? These decisions not only affect the company’s competitiveness in the key, but also related to the production costs of the case company profits effective.
In this study, the case study method and the depth interview to explore outsourcing decision-making mode. Explains how to use the Balanced Scorecard four dimensions expand the architecture to be systematically outsourcing decision-making processes, policies, indicators and measurable goals and internal forms application integration, the Balanced Scorecard strategy management structure of the four dimensions turn the outsourcing decision metrics, and case interviews and case company internal ISO form validation to derive this decision-making mode.
Company limited capacity and rapid changes in the market conditions, customer needs are required in a very short period of time to respond, but any decision-making errors and decision-making delays occur often been caused by the loss of business opportunities. Therefore, within the company needed to plan and clearly formulated products need homemade production or for outside foundry strategy mechanism, cases of the use of the Balanced Scorecard process will help the outsourcing strategy of "integration" and "Focus".
The results of this study show that the case company outsourcing decision model imported in June 2012, the shipping time delivery rate increased to 96% in November 2012 from 74% in January 2012 originally; procurement unit cost of outsourcing plantdown the proportion increased to 10% in November 2012 from 2% in January 2012 originally. By "delivery" and "cost" two measurement basis for analysis, achieve a significant improvement in the effectiveness of the case company. |
參考文獻 |
一、 中文文獻
司徒達賢,策略管理,初版,遠流出版事業股份有限公司,台北市,1995年2月。
吳思華,策略九說,麥田出版社,1996年。
何澤宇,「產品生命週期與供應鏈相關性探討」,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所,碩士論文,2001年。
吳安妮,「平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合(上)」,會計研究月刊,211 期,45-54 頁,2003年。
于泳泓,「未來企業的中心思維」,策略校準-應用平衡計分卡創造組織最佳綜效,臉譜文化,台北市,2006年。
鄭春生和陳貫一,「建構電子製造業外包評選指標之研究」,品質學報,2008年。
二、 英文文獻
Drucker, Peter F., “Managing in a time of great change”, Boston:Harvard Business School Publishing, 1995.
Gilly, K. M. & Rasheed, A., Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Management, Vol.26(4), pp.763-790, 2000.
Gonsalves, A.J.Frank,G.Robert,and Eiler, “Managing complexity through performance measurement”, Management Accounting, Vol.78, No.2, pp.34-39, 1996.
Grady, “Performance measurement: Implementing strategy” Management Accounting, Vol 7, p.51, 1991.
Labbs, J.J., “Successful outsourcing depends on critical factors”, Personnel Journal, pp.51-60, 1993.
Kaplan and D.P.Norton, “The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance.” Harvard Business Review (January/February), pp.71-79, 1992.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. Norton, “The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, pp.71-79, 1992.
Kaplan and D.P.Norton, “Link the balanced scorecard to strategy”, California Management(Fall), p.p53-79, 1996.
Kaplan and D.P.Norton, ”Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system.” Haevard Business Review (January/February), pp.75-85, 1996.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. Norton, “Putting the balanced scorecard to work”, Harvard Business Review, 71(5), pp 134-47, 1993.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. Norton, “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system”, Harvard Business Review, 74(1), pp.75-85, 1996.
Kaplan, Robert S. & Norton, David P., “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action”, Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
Sharpe, M., Outsourcing, “Organizational competitiveness and work”, Journal of Labor Research, Vol.18, pp.535-549, 1997.
Quinn, J.G., “Towards a clarification of spatial processing”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 465-480, 1994. |