Segregation or Integration? A Theoretical Analysis of Education Reform

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：3.21.230.135

姓名

呂智業(Jhih-ye Lyu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

(Segregation or Integration? A Theoretical Analysis of Education Reform)

相關論文

★ 人格特質對薪資影響	★ 男性婚姻溢酬的世代效果-以台灣為例
★ A Simple Two-way Matching Model with Knowledge and Social Skills	★ 職業球員合約年的行為表現-以WAR解析美國職棒大聯盟為例
★ 國中生該怎麼補最有效?以分量迴歸看補習對成績的影響	★ 多元入學管道與在校成績之關係-以國立中央大學為例
★ 選課行為與學業表現-以國立中央大學為例	★ 性別薪資差異：以台灣博士為例
★ 薪資表現、行業別選擇與學院別之關聯性研究—以臺灣高等教育為例	★ 探討離婚之因素-以台灣為例
★ 內外控信念及自我效能對學測表現的影響-以中大壢中為例	★ 影響客家學童客語能力之因素探討
★ 以數值模擬探討貨幣政策獨立性	★ 影響國小生英語成就之因素 —以新竹縣某小學為例
★ 轉系對在學成績和畢業一年薪資的影響—以國立中央大學為例	★ 起始薪資與薪資發展的關係

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

許多國家的教育制度，有將學生依能力分班或分校的情形。然而，為了提升公平性，台灣近期的教育改革試圖要打破明星學校。本文建構了一個理論模型用以分析學生在有無能力分類的兩種教育政策下的最適行為。異於既有文獻，本文加入了學生面對學習學科和術科能力之間的交互影響。模型的推論有助於解釋為何不同國家有不同教育政策。
本文的主要結論如下：第一，學生面對學習不同能力時的態度在最適行為中扮演了重要的角色；第二，無論在哪種教育政策下，比較靜態結果不變；第三，政策分析中，以提升學生能力為考量的決策者適合能力分類的教育政策，而以降低學生負擔為考量的決策者適合無能力分類的教育政策。總結，從有能力分類的教育政策轉變為無能力分類的教育政策雖然能有效減輕學生的壓力，但也同時會削弱學生的能力。

摘要(英)

Ability-grouping occurs in the educational institution for a number of countries. However, recently proposed education reform in Taiwan attempted to eliminate elite schools in order to enhance equity. We construct a theoretical model to analyze students’ behavior for learning under two educational systems: segregation and integration. In contrast to existing literature, we put a special attention on the interaction effect of learning academic ability and skills ability. In this manner, our framework offers possible explanations for different educational policies among countries.
Our main findings are as follows: first, the propensity for learning different abilities play an important role in students’ behavior for studying. Next, comparative statics remain qualitatively unchanged under both segregation or integration. Finally, educational system with segregation may enhance students’ expected payoff and welfare for learning while integration may ease students’ burden for learning. To sum up, the transition from segregation to integration can ease students’ stress but diminish students’ abilities.

關鍵字(中)

★ 能力分班
★ 能力分校
★ 教育改革
★ 福利分析

關鍵字(英)

★ Segregation
★ Integration
★ Education reform
★ Welfare analysis

論文目次

Abstract ii
Acknowledgement iii
1 Introduction 1
2 Literature Review 2
3 Model 4
3.1 Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2 Individuals’ Behavior under Ability-tracking and General System . . . . . 6
3.3 Analysis on Individuals Behavior and Comparative Statics . . . . . . . . . 8
3.3.1 Academic Ability and Skills Ability are Complements (U_i < 0) . . . 9
3.3.2 Academic Ability and Skills Ability are Irrelevant Abilities (U_i = 0) 9
4 Welfare Analysis and Policy Implications 9
4.1 Welfare Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.1.1 Social Planner with PayoOFF-conscious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.1.2 Social Planner with Academic ability-conscious . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.1.3 Social Planner with Pressure-conscious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.1.4 Social Planner with Welfare-conscious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.2 The Comparative statics for Welfare Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.3 Policy Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5 Conclusion 18
References 20
Appendix 22

參考文獻

1. Becker, Gary S. (1964, 1993, 3rd ed.). Human Capital: A
Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special
Reference to Education, Chicago, University of Chicago
Press.
2. Borghans Lex, Huub Meijers and Bas Ter Weel (2008). "The
Role of Noncognitive Skills in Explaining Cognitive Test
Scores," Economic Inquiry, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 2--12.
3. Brunello, Giorgio, Margherita Fort and Guglielmo Weber
(2009). "Changes in compulsory schooling, education and
the distribution of wages in Europe," The Economic
Journal, pp. 516--539.
4. Cheng, P. C. Roger (2004). "Educational Expansion and
Wage Inequality: A Cohort Analysis of Full-Time Male
Employees in Taiwan," Taiwan Economic Review, 32:2 , pp.
233--265.
5. Cheng, P C Roger and Zoe Huang (2011). "Effects of Pass
Rate and Test Discriminability Upon Efforts and Welfare
of Hetrogeneous Exam Takers," Academia Economic Papers,
pp. 501-533.
6. Clotfelter, Charles T. (2013). "School Desegregation,
"Tipping," and Private School Enrollment," The Journal
of Human Resources, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 28-50.
7. Driskill, Robert A. and Andrew W. Horowitz (2002).
"Investment in Hierarchical Human Capital," Review of
Development Economics, 6(1), pp. 48--58.
8. De Fraja Gianni (2002). "The Design of Optimal Education
Policies," Review of Economic Studies, 69, pp. 437-466.
9. Guyon, Nina, Eric Maurin and Sandra McNally (2012). "The
Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different
Schools," The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 47, No.
3, pp. 685-721.
10. Hanushek, Eric A. and Ludger Wößann (2006). "Does
Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality?
Differences-in-Differences Evidence Across Countries,"
The Economic Journal, 116 , pp. 63-76.
11. Kronholz, June (2012). "Academic Value of Non-
Academics," Education Digest, Vol. 77, No. 8 pp. 4-10.
12. Kuhn, Peter and Weinberger, Catherine (2005).
"Leadership Skill and Wages," Journal of Labor
Economics, 23(3), pp. 395-436.
13. Lazear, Edward P. (2001). "Educational Production," The
Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp.
777-803.
14. Meghir, Costas and Mårten Palme (2005). "Educational
Reform, Ability and Family background," American
Economic Review, 95(1), pp. 414--24.
15. Ming-Ching Luoh (2004). "Educational Opportunities and
Family Background in Taiwan," Taiwan Economic Review,
32:4 , pp. 417--445.
16. Murtin, Fabrice and Martina Viarengo (2011). "The
Expansion and Convergence of Compulsory Schooling in
Western Europe, 1950--2000," Economica, 78, pp. 501-
-522.
17. Noah, Harold J., and Max A. Eckstein (1989). "Tradeoffs
in Examination Policies: An International Comparative
Perspective," Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 15, No.
1, pp. 17-27.
18. Reed, Robert R. and Jen-Ruey Tsaur (2010). "The
Importance of Non-cognitive Skills: Observations and
Implications," WEAI Conference Paper.
19. Rivkin, Steven G. (2013). "School Desegregation,
Academic Attainment, and Earnings," The Journal of Human
Resources, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 333-346.
20. Winch, Christopher (2008) "Learning How to Learn: A
Critique," Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 42,
pp. 649-665.

指導教授

曹真睿(Jen-ruey Tsaur)

審核日期

2013-6-18

推文