綠色供應鏈績效： 制度理論觀點

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：41

、訪客IP：3.137.175.113

姓名

何亮甫(Liang-Fu Ho) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

綠色供應鏈績效：制度理論觀點
(Green supply chain performance － Institutional Theory Perspective)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

由於疫情肆虐對全世界的企業造成很多不確定性和恐慌，嚴重擾亂了企業的供應鏈管理，紛紛出現供應鏈「斷鏈」問題，間接影響到消費市場的供需平衡，再加上Covid-19 期間生態意識的提高，使得企業的永續性開始受到越來越多的關注，對綠色供應鏈管理的研究也同樣大幅增加。綠色供應鏈管理(Green Supply Chain Management)透過提高能源使用效率降低生產浪費，並強調與利益關係人之間的合作，能提高整體組織績效，減少工業活動對環境的影響。有鑑於此，本研究以台灣企業為研究對象，並以制度理論觀點解釋供應商的參與和積極性對於綠色供應鏈管理的成功至關重要，釐清供應商是受到供應鏈引領企業哪一種綠色情境因素影響，進而使引領企業產生綠色願景並向供應鏈傳達共同目標，使供應商在面臨供應鏈中相似的挑戰與需求，而逐漸發展出相似的組織形式與價值觀，最終供應商將與引領企業建立長期且穩固的承諾關係達到綠色供應鏈績效。
本研究使用問卷調查，目標對象為各公司供應鏈的管理階層，總計回收107份有效問卷，以偏最小平方法的結構方程模型進行研究假設之分析。經由實證研究，本研究發現藉由環境生態問題突出性以及領域網絡性能有效影響引領企業建立綠色願景並向供應鏈共享；此外，供應商之間的制度相似性，在供應鏈演化同型的過程中有顯著的調節效果，能有效加強供應商與引領企業的關係承諾，並透過緊密的關係承諾正向顯著影響整體綠色供應鏈績效。本研究之研究結果能為學術與企業在未來對綠色供應鏈發展、供應鏈演化同型等領域提供參考與建議。

摘要(英)

Due to the rampant spread of the pandemic, it has caused a lot of uncertainty and panic for businesses worldwide. This situation has severely disrupted supply chain management for companies, leading to various instances of supply chain "disruptions." Indirectly, this has affected the supply-demand balance in consumer markets. Coupled with the heightened ecological awareness during the Covid-19 period, the sustainability of businesses has started to receive increasing attention. Consequently, research on green supply chain management has also seen a significant increase.Green Supply Chain Management emphasizes improving energy efficiency, reducing production waste, and promoting collaboration with stakeholders to enhance overall organizational performance and minimize industrial impacts on the environment. In view of this, this study focuses on Taiwanese companies, using institutional theory to explain the crucial role of supplier participation and enthusiasm in the success of green supply chain management. It aims to clarify which green contextual factors influenced by the supply chain lead to the development of a green vision in companies and the transmission of shared goals throughout the supply chain. This helps suppliers, facing similar challenges and needs within the supply chain, gradually develop similar organizational forms and values. Ultimately, this leads to the establishment of long-term and stable commitment relationships between suppliers and leading companies, achieving green supply chain performance.
The study employs questionnaire surveys targeting management tiers of various company supply chains. A total of 107 valid responses were collected. The analysis of research hypotheses was conducted using the structural equation model with partial least squares (PLS-SEM). Through empirical research, the study found that the prominence of environmental ecological issues and the performance of domain networks significantly influence leading companies to establish green visions and share them with the supply chain. Additionally, the institutional similarity among suppliers exhibits a significant moderating effect during the process of supply chain evolution, effectively enhancing the commitment relationship between suppliers and leading companies. Through this close commitment relationship, green supply chain performance is positively impacted.The findings of this research can provide academic and business insights and recommendations for the future development of green supply chains and the evolution of supply chain homogeneity.

關鍵字(中)

★ 綠色供應鏈管理
★ 生態問題突出性
★ 領域網絡性
★ 員工價值觀注
★ 分享綠色願景
★ 關係承諾
★ 制度相似性
★ 綠供應鏈績效
★ 演化同形
★ 強制同形
★ 模仿同形
★ 規範同形

關鍵字(英)

★ Green Supply Chain Management
★ Ecological Issue Salience
★ Field Cohession
★ Individual Concern
★ Green Shared Vision
★ Relationship Commitment
★ Institutional Similarity
★ Green Supply Chain Performance
★ Convergent Evolution
★ Coercive Isomorphism
★ Mimetic Isomorphism
★ Normative isomorphism

論文目次

摘要........................i
Abstract...................ii
致謝.......................iii
目錄........................iv
圖目錄......................vi
表目錄......................vi
第一章緒論..................1
1-1研究背景與動機............1
1-2研究目的..................4
1-3研究流程..................5
第二章文獻探討...............6
2-1綠色供應鏈管理.............6
2-2供應鏈演化同形............14
2-3-2領域網絡性..............15
2-3-3員工價值關注............16
2-4綠色供應鏈績效............17
第三章研究方法...............18
3-1研究架構..................18
3-2研究假設..................19
3-2-1.綠色情境因素與分享綠色願景關係...........19
3-2-2供應鏈演化同形關係.......................21
3-2-3供應鏈演化同形對綠色供應鏈績效關係.........23
3-3衡量構面與變數的操作型定義..................26
3-4研究樣本與問與問卷.........................27
3-4-1研究樣本................................27
3-4-2研究問卷................................27
3-4-3交叉滯後模型............................30
3-5統計方法分析..............................33
3-5-1信度檢定................................33
3-5-2效度檢定................................33
3-5-3假設驗證................................34
第四章資料分析與研究驗證......................37
4-1 樣本基本資料分析..........................37
4-2 研究構面敘述性統計分析.....................39
4-3測量模型之信效度分析........................41
4-3-1信度分析.................................41
4-3-2效度分析.................................42
4-4 結構模型路徑分析...........................46
4-4-1研究模型與模型配適度檢定...................46
4-4-2路徑分析結果..............................48
4-4-3實證討論..................................50
第五章結論與建議...............................54
5-1 結論.......................................54
5-2 研究意涵...................................55
5-2-1學術意涵..................................55
5-2-2實務建議..................................56
5-3 研究限制與後續研究建議......................58
參考文獻.......................................60
附錄一問卷....................................69

參考文獻

A.C. Inkpen, E.W.K Tsang (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146– 165.
Anwar, N., Mahmood, N. H. N., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J. N., and Khalid, W (2020). Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120401.
Arshad Ali, A., Mahmood, A., Ikram, A., and Ahmad, A. (2020). Configuring the drivers and carriers of process innovation in manufacturing organizations. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6:154.
Baah, C., Jin, Z. and Tang, L. (2020a). Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: investigating corporate reputation as a missing link. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 247, 119125.
Baah, C., Opoku-Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Faibil, D., & Abdoulaye, F. A. M. (2021). Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 100– 114.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.
Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 19-31.
Beamon, B.M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 332-342.
Birasnav, M. & Bienstock, J. (2019). Supply chain integration, advanced manufacturing technology, and strategic leadership: an empirical study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 130, pp. 142-157.
Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. The Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 154.
Brown, W. F. ; Adjei, M. B., (1995). Urea ammoniation effects on the feeding value of guineagrass (Panicum maximum) hay. J. Anim. Sci., 73 (10): 3085-3093
Carter, C.R., Kale, R. and Grimm, C.M. (2000). Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 219-228.
Chan, R.Y.K., He, H., Chan, H.K. and Wang, W.Y.C. (2012). Environmental orientation and corporate performance: the mediation mechanism of green supply chain management and moderating effect of competitive intensity. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 621-630.
Chen, Y. S., Chang, C. H., Yeh, S. L., and Cheng, H. I. (2015). GSV and green creativity: the mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Qual. Quant. 49, 1169–1184.
Chen, X., Yi, N., Zhang, L. and Li, D. (2018). Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China′s top 100 companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 188, pp. 304-311.
Chiu, W.C.; Harry Hui, C.; Lai, G.W.(2007). Psychological ownership and organizational optimism amid China’s corporate transformation: Effects of an employee ownership scheme and a management-dominated board. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 18(2),pp. 303-320
Christmann, P., Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the Environment: Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China. J Int Bus Stud 32, 439–458.
Clemens, B. & Douglas, T. (2006). Does coercion drive firms to adiot “voluntary” green initiatives?Relationships among coercion, superior firm resources, and coluntary green initiatives. Journal of Business Research, 59,pp. 483-491.
Culadasa, U. Tucson. (2013). The Magic of Mindfulness: Seeing Things as They Really Are. Dharma Treasure Press.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
Daily, B.; Bishop, J.; Govindarajulu, N.(2009). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Bus. Soc , 48, pp. 243–256.
Darnall, N., and Sides, S. (2008). Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental programs: doescertification matter? Policy Studies Journal 36(1), pp. 95–117
Deephouse, D.L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate?, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 1024-1039.
Deephouse, D.L., Newburry, W. and Soleimani, A. (2016). The effects of institutional development and national culture on cross-national differences in corporate reputation. Journal of World Business, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 463-473.
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 1,pp. 147-160.
D’Souza, C.; Ahmed, T.; Khashru, M.A.; Ahmed, R.; Ratten, V.; Jayaratne, M. (2022). The Complexity of Stakeholder Pressures and Their Influence on Social and Environmental Responsibilities. J. Clean. Prod. pp. 358, 132038.
Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Samar Ali, S.(2015). Exploring the Relationship between Leadership, Operational Practices, Institutional Pressures and Environmental Performance: A Framework for Green Supply Chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ, Vol. 160. pp.120–132.
Ellram, L.M. (1995). Total Cost of Ownership: An Analysis Approach for Purchasing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,Vol 25.pp. 4-23.
Famiyeh, S., Adaku, E., Kwasi, A.-G., Disraeli, A.-D. and Charles, T.A. (2018). Environmental management practices, operational competitiveness and environmental performance: empirical evidence from a developing country. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 588-607.
Fawcett, S.E., Osterhaus, P., Magnan, G.M., Brau, J.G. and McCarter, M.W. (2007). Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 358‐68.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), pp. 39-50.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp. 382-388.
Frank, P.; Brock, C. (2019). Green cannibalism or an organic inside job? Empirical insights into the rivalry of ethical grocery types. Psychol and Marketing., 36, pp. 597–617.
Frazier,G L and Summers,J,O (1986). Perceptions of Interfirm Power and its use within a Franchise Channel of Distribution. Journal of Marketing Research.
Gao, Y., Li, J. and Song, Y. (2009). Performance evaluation of green supply chain management based on membership conversion algorithm. ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, IEEE, Sanya, pp. 237-240.
Green, K. W., Inman, R. A., Sower, V. E., & Zelbst, P. J. (2019). Impact of JIT, TQM and green supply chain practices on environmental sustainability. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1),pp. 26– 47.
Gupta, S., and O. D. Palsule-Desai. (2011). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Review and Research Opportunities. IIMB Management Review 23, pp. 234–245.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). Population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5),pp. 929-964.
Hasse,Raimund&Krücken,Georg(2009).Neo-institutionalistische Wirtschaftssoziologie,in:Jens Beckert & Christoph Deutschmann (Hrsg.), Wirtschaftssoziologie,Sonderheft 49 derKölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwis-senschaften. S. 194–207.
Henisz, W.J., (2001). The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth. Economics and Politics, 12,pp. 1– 31.
Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), pp. 1–14.
Huo, B., Han, Z., Zhao, X., Zhou, H., Wood, C.H. and Zhai, X. (2013). The impact of institutional pressures on supplier integration and financial performance: evidence from China. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 146 No. 1, pp. 82-94.
Hu, P.J., Hsu, F., Hu, H., & Chen, H. (2010). Agency satisfaction with electronic record management systems: A large-scale survey study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), pp. 2559– 2574.
Jansen, J.J.P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: the moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45, pp. 982-1007.
Joshi, A.W. and Campbell, A.J. (2003). Effect of environmental dynamism on relational governance in manufacturer supplier relationships: a contingency framework and an empirical test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 176-188.
Kenny, D. A. (2005). Cross‐lagged panel design. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science.
Khan, S. A. R., and Qianli, D. (2017). Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms′ performance: an empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, pp. 16829–16844.
Khan SAR, Yu Z, Umar M, Tanveer M. (2022). Green capabilities and green purchasing practices: a strategy striving towards sustainable operations. Bus Strateg Environ.
Kim, M.G.; Woo, C.; Rho, J.J.; Chung, Y.(2016). Environmental Capabilities of Suppliers for Green Supply Chain Management in Construction Projects: A Case Study in Korea. Sustainability, 8,p. 82.
Kim and Chai, M. Kim, S. Chai. (2017). Implementing environmental practices for accomplishing sustainable green supply chain management. Sustainability, 9 (7) , p. 1192.
Kung, F.H., Huang, C.L. and Cheng, C.L. (2012). Assessing the green value chain to improve environmental performance evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry. International Journal of Development Issues, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 111-128.
K Tanskanen, A Aminoff. (2015). Buyer and supplier attractiveness in a strategic relationship : a dyadic multiple-case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, pp. 128-141,
Lampe MA, Patarca R, Iregui MV, Cantor H. (1991). Polyclonal B cell activation by the Eta-1 cytokine and the development of systemic autoimmune disease. J Immunol 147,pp. 2902-2906.
Lawrence AT, Morell D. (1995). Leading-edge environ-mental management: motivation, opportunity,resources and processes. In Special Research Volume of Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Sus-taining the Natural Environment: Empirical Studies on theInterface Between Nature and Organizations, Collins D,Starik M (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, pp. 99–126.
Lane, C. (2000). Introduction: theories and issues in the study of trust, in Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (Eds), Trust Within and Between Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 1‐30.
Li, F. and Ding, D.Z. (2013). The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 506-525.
Li, J.; Yuan, L.; Ning, L.; Li-Ying, J.(2015). Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: The mediating role of psychological owner-ship. J. Knowl. Manag., 19, pp. 1146–1166.
Li, Y.-H., & Huang, J.-W. (2017). The moderating role of relational bonding in green supply chain practices and performance. Special Issue of the 25th Annual IPSERA Conference, Dortmund, Germany, 2016 Purchasing & Supply Management: From Efficiency to Effectiveness in an Integrated Supply Chain, 23(4), 290– 299.
Li, G., Xue, Q., & Qin, J. (2022). Environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp. 176.
Lo, S., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., and Zhao, X. (2018). The impact of relationship quality and supplier development on green supply chain integration: A mediation and moderation analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 202,pp. 524–535.
Mackie, D. M., & Goethals, G. R. (1987). Individual and group goals. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes. Pp, 144–166.
Meindl, B., Ayala, N.F., Mendonça, J. and Frank, A.G. (2021). The four smarts of Industry 4.0: evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 168.
Meyer JW, Rowan B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, pp, 41–62.
Morali, O. and Searcy, C. (2013). A review of sustainable supply chain practices in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 117 No. 3, pp. 636-658.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), pp. 20–38.
Narasimhan, R., & Das, A. (2001). The Impact of Purchasing Integration and Practices on Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19. pp. 593-609.
Oil and Gas Journal. Twachtman, R.J. (1997). Offshore Platforms Decommissioning Perceptions Change 95 (49).
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16.pp. 145- 179.
Omer, A.M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 12 No. 9, pp. 2265-2300.
O′Reilly, C.A., III and Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator′s dilemma. Research in Organisational Behavior, Vol. 28, pp. 185-206.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solider syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Padín, Xose Antonio. (2017). Underway physical oceanography and carbon dioxide measurements during Sarmiento de Gamboa cruise 29AH20160618. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas de Vigo, PANGAEA,
Pagell, M., & Krause, D. R. (2002). Strategic consensus in the internal supply chain: Exploring the manufacturing-purchasing link. International Journal of Production Research, 40,pp. 3075– 3092.
Park-Poaps, H. and Rees, K. (2010). Stakeholder forces of socially responsible supply chain management orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 92 No. 2, pp. 305-322.
Parmigiani, R.D. Klassen, M. V. (2011). Russo.Efficiency meets accountability: performance implications of supply chain configuration, control, and capabilitiesJ. Oper. Manag., 29 (3) , pp. 212-223.
Parsons, M. L., & Singer, S. F. (1995). Global warming: The truth behind the myth. New York: Plenum.
Qazi, A.A. and Appolloni, A. (2022). A systematic review on barriers and enablers toward circular procurement management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 33, pp. 343-359.
Rao, P. (2002). Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 632-655.
Rao, P. and Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 25 No. 9, pp. 898-916.
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green Human Resource Management:A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15,pp. 1-14.
Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2017). Toward a new measure of organizational environmental citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, 75,pp. 57–66.
Sako, M. (1992). Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter‐firm Relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 397-409.
Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K-H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1), pp. 1–15.
Seethamraju, R. C., and Frost, G. (2019). Deployment of Information Systems for Sustainability Reporting and Performance. 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems.pp, 15-17.
Senbel. (2015). Leadership in sustainability planning: propagating visions through empathic communication. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. Pages.pp. 464-481.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. S1, pp. 183-200.
Shubham, Charan, P. and Murty, L.S. (2018). Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 23-34.
Shukla, D. (2016). Student’s Perceived Level and Teachers’ Teaching Strategies of Higher-Order Thinking Skills, a Study on Higher Educational Institutions in Thailand. Ongkharak: Department of Business Administration, St. Theresa International College, Thailand.
Singh, P.B. and Pandey, K.K. (2012). Green marketing: policies and practices for sustainable development. Integral Review: A Journal of Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 22-30.
Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1),pp. 500– 514.
Slater & Narver .(1995). Market Orientation and Learning Organization. Journal of Marketing 59(3), pp. 63-74.
Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), pp. 53– 80.
Starik M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, pp. 207-218.
Tang, A.K.Y., Lai, K.H. and Cheng, T.C.E. (2012). Environmental governance of enterprises and their economic upshot through corporate reputation and customer satisfaction. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 401-411.
C. Tsinopoulos, C.M.P. Sousa, J. Yan. (2018). Process innovation: open innovation and the moderating role of the motivation to achieve legitimacy J. Prod. Innovat. Manag., 35 (1) , pp. 27-48
Tuan, L.T.(2018). Activating tourists’ citizenship behavior for the environment: The roles of CSR and frontline employees’ citizenship behavior for the environment. J. Sustain. Tour. 26,pp. 1178–1203.
Tukker, A., Eder, P., Charter, M., Haag, E., Vercalsteren, A. and Wiedmann, T. (2001). Eco-design: the state of implementation in Europe : conclusions of a state of the art study for IPTS. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 171-181.
Vicente Roca-Puig. (2019). The circular path of social sustainability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production.Vol 212, pp. 916-924.
Vredenburg, H., Westley, F. (1993). Strategic bridging: A role for the multinational corporation in Third World Development ,pp. 103-108.
Vogus, T.J., Sutcliffe, K.M. (2012). Organizational mindfulness and mindful organizing: a reconciliation and path forward. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 11(4), pp. 722–735.
Wang, H., Khan, M. A. S., Anwar, F., Shahzad, F., Adu, D., & Murad, M. (2021a). Green innovation practices and its impacts on environmental and organizational performance. Frontiers Psychology, 11 ,pp. 324‐334.
Wang, M., Li, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2021b). Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model. Journal of Environmental Management, pp. 297.
Yang, J., Wang, J., Wong, C.W.Y. and Lai, K.-H. (2008). Relational stability and alliance performance in supply chain. Omega, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 600-608.
Yeh, T.-M., Pai, F.-Y. and Wu, L.-C. (2020). Relationship stability and supply chain performance for SMEs: from internal, supplier, and customer integration perspectives. Mathematics, Vol. 8 No. 11, pp. 1902.
Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Briggs, W. H., Vroh, B. I., Yamasaki, M., Doebley, J. F., et al. (2006). A unifed mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38,pp. 203–208.
Zhu, Q. and Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 265-289.
Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Geng, Y (2005). Green Supply Chain Management in China: Pressures, Practices and Performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag, 25,pp. 449–468.
Zhu, Q. , Sarkis, J. and Lai, K. (2007). Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Zhu Q,Sarkis J, Lai K-H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1),pp. 1–15.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. and Lai, K.-h. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 106-117.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung)

審核日期

2023-10-19

推文